Skip to main content

Onus of disclosures likely on promoters

By
After SAT rap, Sebi to provide clarity on requirement under takeover code regulations
The Securities and Exchange Board of India ( Sebi) would soon need to provide clarity on the disclosure requirement under
the takeover code regulations.
Specifically, if the yearly disclosure requirement is of the individual promoter or the promoter group. This is a fallout of a Securities and Appellate Tribunal ( SAT) ruling which opted for the latter view. It was critical of the Sebi stance in a number of cases.
SAT said Sebi's was an inconsistent approach : In some cases, it had ruled one way on this issue and then the other.
SAT had clubbed around 15 appeals against Sebi rulings in these matters. "Since there is no uniformity among the ( Officers) of Sebi in determining the obligation to make yearly disclosure under the regulations in question, we call upon counsel for Sebi to inform us accordingly," it stated last month.
Adding: "It is the duty of Sebi to ensure consistency in implementing the regulations framed by it and that there is no uncertainty. It is unfortunate that Sebi wants that the orders passed by its AOs be upheld even though the said orders are
mutually contradictory." "The dispute in all the appeals was pertaining to the obligation casted on the promoter/ promoter group to make yearly shareholding disclosure under Sebi takeover regulations.
The appeals were due to inconsistency in Sebis approach in determining (if) the said disclosure obligation is on each and
every promoter or on the promoter group, and in case of failure to make such disclosure, whether each and every promoter is to be separately penalised or a penalty is to be jointly imposed on the promoter group," said Tejesh Chitlangi, founder, IC Legal.
SAT said on a plain reading of the Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeover Regulations, the obligation of making
disclosures should be with the promoter group. Market participants this clarity from SAT would reduce the confusion to a
large extent.
ACTION AND REACTION
  • SAT critical of Sebi stance on disclosure obligation
  • Sebi in some cases ruled responsibility is with promoters and in some others with promoter group for disclosure under the
  • SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011 SAT clubbed together 17 appeals
  • SAT ruled responsibility of disclosures is with promoter group
Business Standard, New Delhi, 17th Dec. 2015

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Data storage norm splits digital payments industry

By
Data storage norm splits digital payments industry  India’s nascent digital payment industry could be thrown into disarray due to the demand by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) that all user data be stored within the country, fears an industry grouping, which has termed the decision as “heavy-handed”, even as others, including the country’s largest digital payment provider Paytm, have hailed the move.  In a bid to narrow the growing schism, the industry is planning to send a formal representation to the regulator highlighting its concerns, a top official told ET.  “We are trying to build a consensus on the issue," said the person adding that the representation to the central bank will be ready this week.  RBI on April 6, mandated all payment companies—global and local—to set up data storage facilities within India by October. The stringent six-month deadline has attracted the ire of several sections of the industry that fear it will lead to a disruption of wel...
18 comments
Read more

Sebi to finalise options in commodities today

By
The Commodity Derivatives Advisory Committee of the Securities and Exchange Board of India ( Sebi) will meet on Friday with senior officials of the latter, to give a final shape to the rules on options trading in commodity futures, beside revising the warehousing norms to ensure good delivery on settlement. The decision taken, after discussing with the advisory committee, will be placed before the regulator’s board, to finalise the regulations. According to knowledgeable sources, three commodities in each segment, agricultural and non- agricultural, have been proposed for introducing options. It appears commodities from the soya and guar segments are preferred in the former. From the non- agri segment, it is likely that gold, silver and crude oil will be finalised. All these These have better liquidity and both the National Commodity and Derivatives Exchange and the Multi Commodity Exchange, respectively, will be able to introduce the options. In the equity segments, options ar...
17 comments
Read more

E tailers global warehouses may come under tax net

By
E tailers  global warehouses may come under tax net Warehouses of e-commerce companies based in countries such as Australia, Japan, Italy,  Spain, the Netherlands, and Russia may not be exempted from paying the income tax in India  once the multilateral instrument (MLI) to prevent base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS)  comes into force. BEPS refers to the reporting framework mooted by the Organisation for Economic  Co-operation and Development (OECD) and signed by over 100 countries, including India, to  prevent exploiting gaps and mismatches in tax rules to shift profits by multinational  companies (MNCs) artificially to low-tax regimes. The representatives of 68 countries on June 7 this year signed an agreement (MLI) in Paris  to amend their tax treaties to bring them in alignment with measures to prevent BEPS.  However, there is still time for synchronising tax treaties with the multilateral  instrument. India has submitte...
17 comments
Read more