Skip to main content

Cos to Take GST Audit Exam; Experts Want No Penal Action

GST returns and accounts of firms to be audited for the first time; June 30 last date to file returns
India Inc. is gearing up to face the first test of their goods and services tax filings, with the authorities looking to initiate audits by picking up returns for risk-based assessment from July. “There is a direction that the audits should begin in July,” a government official said. The audit is significant because this is the first time that GST returns and the accounts of companies will be scrutinised for compliance levels and the positions they had taken — whether they had interpreted tax provisions correctly and paid tax — after GST was introduced in July 2017. However, tax experts have called for the authorities to adopt a moderate approach during the reviews.
Companies are required to file two returns by December 31, following the financial year ended March, although for FY18, the deadline was extended to June 30, 2019. The returns are the GSTR9, or the annual return, and GSTR9C, or the annual reconciliation statement of GST returns with financial statements, certified by a chartered accountant. The GSTR9C is the GST audit report and is akin to the tax audit report. This will become the basis for all GST audits conducted in future. “This will also be a test of how the GST audit certificates issued in the GSTR9C format are utilised by the authorities and their significance in the whole audit process,” said Bipin Sapra, a partner at EY. Experts batted for a lenient view this time.
“Businesses need to be prepared as this will be the first departmental audit,” said Anita Rastogi, indirect tax partner at PwC. “Also, considering that it will pertain to the first year of GST, it is recommended that the authorities should be mindful of the fact that there were many interpretational and portal issues and therefore a lenient view should be considered.” Sapra of EY supported this view. “Initial process ought to be more liberal and the auditors should look to educate taxpayers if there is a compliance gap and avoid stringent penal actions,” he said.
The first year’s deadline for returns had been extended because the formats of both returns were very elaborate and were released late too close to the last date. The government issued a clarification on Tuesday making it clear that the returns need to be filed before June 30. According to an official statement, taxpayers who reported a mismatch between auto-populated data and the entries in their books of accounts or returns should report the data as per their books of accounts or returns filed.
The Economic Times, 05th June 2019


Popular posts from this blog

April GST collections at new high despite rate rationalisation in December

Goods and services tax (GST) collection touched a record high in April, exceeding Rs 1 trillion for the third time in four months. The mop-up was 10 per cent higher over the previous year. Gross collection for the month was Rs 1.13 trillion, said the finance ministry. Despite the recent rate rationalisation in December, a rise in collection was reported. Of the total collected, the CGST (central GST) contributed Rs 21,163 crore, the SGST (state GST) Rs 28,801 crore, the IGST (integrated GST) Rs 54,733 crore (including Rs 23,289 crore on import) and cess Rs 9,168 crore (including Rs 1,053 crore on import). After settlement of the IGST and the balance IGST in a 50:50 ratio between the Centre and states on a provisional basis, the CGST stood at Rs 47,533 crore and SGST at Rs 50,776 crore. The CGST target in the Union Budget for 2019-20 is Rs 6.1 trillion. “The April collection indicates the tax base is increasing gradually, with GST getting stabilised with measures such as e-way bills and…

Defaults are Costly: Bankruptcy Law Gives Lenders More Teeth

Lenders can bargain strongly on asset recovery, defaulting borrowers can lose control of co With the Bankruptcy Act in place, banks can breathe easy, at least in the medium term, as corporate borrowers will now intensify their efforts to avoid loan defaults and the likely loss of management control of business, said Moody's Investors Service. This will empower lenders to bargain strongly in matters of asset recovery, while borrowers can gain with lower borrowing costs after three-four quarters. “The (defaulting) borrowers will lose control of the company as soon as the process is initiated,“ Srikanth Vadlamani, vicepresident, Financial Institutions Group, Moody's Investors Service, told ET from Singapore.“This, in itself, should act as a key incentive for them not to default in the first place.“ A few weeks ago, the government passed the Bankruptcy Bill, introducing a time-bound settlement process against loan default. With the Bankruptcy Act, the resolution process-from the date …

SC order on RBI circular: More options for banks to tackle defaulting firms

Lenders also have the option of restructuring the loans Lenders to companies which are under stress could now have three options to deal with them if they default on loans: take a haircut as part of a one-time settlement, restructure the loans for a longer tenure as they did when corporate debt restructuring schemes were allowed, or go to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) for redress. These changes in the options available to lenders come, according to PE funds and bank lawyers who are involved in the IBC process, in the wake of the Supreme Court on Tuesday setting aside the 12 February RBI circular, which allowed a 180-day window to banks to resolve a company default.But they can still find a resolution. According to a Reserve Bank of India circular, a loan becomes a non-performing asset when banks cannot find a way of recovering their money in 90 days. In short, banks still have a window to resolve the default. Lenders can take a haircut as part of a one -time settlement of du…