Skip to main content

Sebi Plan to Build KYC Database of Beneficial Owners Irks FPIs

Large overseas fund managers such as Templeton, Fidelity and BlackRock have opposed the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) proposal to create a central database containing the personal information of all beneficial owners of offshore funds, said two people with direct knowledge of the matter. Such a database held by an external agency in India would violate the law in their home countries, they argue.
The issue pertains to disclosure of know-your-customer (KYC) information of beneficial owners (BOs). Sebi had issued a circular on April 10 last year asking foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) to identify the BO of a fund based on not just ownership but control as well. In cases where there is no significant BO based on economic ownership, fund managers and other senior management officials of the funds were to be considered BOs. All publicly pooled funds such as foreign mutual funds have no significant BO since they raise money from thousands of small unit holders. In such cases, the chief investment officers or other senior management officials become the BOs.
Stiff opposition from FPIs, especially non-resident Indians (NRIs), on this issue forced Sebi to water down the rule. The regulator restricted the new interpretation of beneficial ownership to KYC purposes. Under this, FPIs will have to submit KYC documents of beneficial owners to custodian banks, which in turn will share them with registrars.
Sensitive Issue for Investors
Sebi has asked registrars to create a centralised database of documents that can be accessed even by other market intermediaries provided they obtain consent from the FPIs. Sebi, Templeton, Fidelity and Blackrock did not respond to queries. The issue was brought up at several meetings of the Sebi-appointed HR Khan Committee on foreign portfolio investment. FPIs have suggested that, as an alternative, they will obtain all KYC and submit an affidavit to Sebi stating that they have done so and any details will be provided to the regulator when demanded. While the proposal was initially considered, it was eventually dropped because the regulator felt funds could use such exceptions to hide beneficial owners.
Some FPIs suggested Sebi should manage the data itself instead of asking third parties to do so. “Sebi is aware of these challenges and the HR Khan committee is exploring suitable solutions,” said Sriram Krishnan, head of securities services, Deutsche Bank. “We are confident that all the investor feedback in this regard will be suitably addressed soon.” Many offshore funds had opposed the proposal on the grounds that employee data cannot be saved outside the home country in accordance with the local law.
The issue is sensitive, especially to investors from Europe, where new data privacy laws such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) have come into effect. “Under GDPR, organisations cannot force their employees to share personal data with a third party,” said one of the persons cited above. “These funds will have to comply with their domestic laws as well.”
However, Sebi is unwilling to budge on the matter because FPIs have complied with such requirements in some other countries. “Some of the funds which are opposing Sebi's proposal now have previously complied with similar laws in countries like the US and Canada,” said one of the people cited above. Sebi has assured offshore funds that their data will be safe and it is planning stiff penalties against entities or individuals trying to access confidential information without the regulator’s approval. The regulator could also revoke the licence of such violators.
“Sebi shall have to work out measures which will convince FPIs that their data will be confidential and shall never be parted with,” said Neha Malviya, director of Wilson Financial Services, an FPI brokerage. In the past, regulators and companies have squabbled over data privacy and localisation. The Reserve Bank of India and the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India have also faced similar resistance in the past.
The Economic Times, 11th March 2019

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New income tax slab and rates for new tax regime FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25) announced in Budget 2023

  Basic exemption limit has been hiked to Rs.3 lakh from Rs 2.5 currently under the new income tax regime in Budget 2023. Further, the income tax slabs in the new tax regime has been changed. According to the announcement, 5 income tax slabs will be there in FY 2023-24, from 6 income tax slabs currently. A rebate under Section 87A has been enhanced under the new tax regime; from the current income level of Rs.5 lakh to Rs.7 lakh. Thus, individuals opting for the new income tax regime and having an income up to Rs.7 lakh will not pay any taxes   The income tax slabs under the new income tax regime will now be as follows: Rs 0 to Rs 3 lakh - 0% tax rate Rs 3 lakh to 6 lakh - 5% Rs 6 lakh to 9 lakh - 10% Rs 9 lakh to Rs 12 lakh - 15% Rs 12 lakh to Rs 15 lakh - 20% Above Rs 15 lakh - 30%   The revised Income tax slabs under new tax regime for FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25)   Income tax slabs under new tax regime Income tax rates under new tax regime O to Rs 3 lakh 0 Rs 3 lakh to Rs 6 lakh 5% Rs 6

Jaitley plans to cut MSME tax rate to 25%

Income tax for companies with annual turnover up to ?50 crore has been reduced to 25% from 30% in order to make Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) companies more viable and also to encourage firms to migrate to a company format. This move will benefit 96% or 6.67 lakh of the 6.94 lakh companies filing returns of lower taxation and make MSME sector more competitive as compared with large companies. However, bigger firms have shown their disappointment since the proposal for reducing tax rates was to make Indian firms competitive globally and it is the large firms that are competing globally. The Finance Minister foregone revenue estimate of Rs 7,200 crore per annum for this for this measure. Besides, the Finance Minister refrained from removing or reducing Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT), a popular demand from India Inc., but provided a higher period of 15 years for carry forward of future credit claims, instead of the existing 10-year period. “It is not practical to rem

Don't forget to verify your income tax return in August: Here's the process

  An ITR return needs to be verified within 120 days of filing of tax return. Now that you have filed your income tax return, remember to verify it because your return filing process is not complete unless you do so. The CBDT has reduced the time limit of ITR verification to 30 days (from 120 days) from the date of return submission. The new rule is applicable for the returns filed online on or after 1st August 2022. E-verification is the most convenient and instant method for verifying your ITR. However, if you prefer not to e-verify, you have the option to verify it by sending a physical copy of the ITR-V. Taxpayers who filed returns by July 31, 2023 but forget to verify their tax returns, will get the following email from the tax department, as per ClearTax. If your ITR is not verified within 30 days of e-filing, it will be considered invalid, and may be liable to pay a Late Fee. Aadhaar OTP | EVC through bank account | EVC through Demat account | Sending duly signed ITR-V through s