Skip to main content

'Examine if rate cut benefits reach consumers'

By
The plea by an NGO cited an RBI report that found banks were not passing benefits of lower rates to customers
The plea alleged that by failing to take action on the petitioner’s repeated requests for justice on behalf of citizens, RBI had deliberately acquiesced in the discrimination by banks in the name of implementing the marginal cost of funds-based lending rate (MCLR) regime. From time to time, RBI has expressed concerns about the reluctance of banks to pass on rate cuts to consumers, and made several attempts to change the way they price their loans. In 2003, RBI introduced the benchmark prime lending rate (BPLR), but this failed to bring in transparency, as a large part of the lending took place at interest rates below the announced BPLRs.
Then came the base rate, which was to be the minimum rate for all loans and calculated on the basis of cost of funds. Individual borrowers were charged a spread over the base rate, which was tweaked to benefit only new borrowers. The drawbacks of these lending rates led RBI to introduce MCLR in April 2016. However, in the absence of a sunset clause on the base rate, banks were slow to migrate their customers to the MCLR regime. In October 2017, a committee under the central bank recommended linking bank lending rates to a market benchmark like T-bills, certificate of deposit or repo rate.
The panel noted that since April 2016, the one-year MCLR had come down by 95 basis points (bps), whereas the repo rate was down by 75 bps, but MCLR had been mostly used for fresh loans. However, the recommendation was opposed by banks, which felt that the regulator should also allow deposit rates to be linked to an external benchmark if it wanted to apply such a benchmark to lending rates. As interest rates started going up after April 2018, the noise around transmission lag abated.
“Benefit of repo rate cut was passed on to fresh borrowers. Existing borrowers did not see a cut in borrowing rates. These switching costs were also charged, prohibiting existing borrowers from switching base rate to MCLR, thereby denying the benefit of lower MCLR to existing borrowers,” said Anul Gupta, sector head, financial sector ratings, Icra Ltd. “Though RBI’s proposal was to link lending rate to external benchmark, in the rising interest rate scenario, it would have led to faster repricing even though the downside was denied to existing borrowers.” Gopika Gopakumar in Mumbai contributed to this story.
The Mint,09th October 2018

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New income tax slab and rates for new tax regime FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25) announced in Budget 2023

By
  Basic exemption limit has been hiked to Rs.3 lakh from Rs 2.5 currently under the new income tax regime in Budget 2023. Further, the income tax slabs in the new tax regime has been changed. According to the announcement, 5 income tax slabs will be there in FY 2023-24, from 6 income tax slabs currently. A rebate under Section 87A has been enhanced under the new tax regime; from the current income level of Rs.5 lakh to Rs.7 lakh. Thus, individuals opting for the new income tax regime and having an income up to Rs.7 lakh will not pay any taxes   The income tax slabs under the new income tax regime will now be as follows: Rs 0 to Rs 3 lakh - 0% tax rate Rs 3 lakh to 6 lakh - 5% Rs 6 lakh to 9 lakh - 10% Rs 9 lakh to Rs 12 lakh - 15% Rs 12 lakh to Rs 15 lakh - 20% Above Rs 15 lakh - 30%   The revised Income tax slabs under new tax regime for FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25)   Income tax slabs under new tax regime Income tax rates under new tax regime O to Rs 3 lakh 0 Rs 3 lakh to Rs 6 lakh 5% Rs 6
Post a Comment
Read more

Jaitley plans to cut MSME tax rate to 25%

By
Income tax for companies with annual turnover up to ?50 crore has been reduced to 25% from 30% in order to make Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) companies more viable and also to encourage firms to migrate to a company format. This move will benefit 96% or 6.67 lakh of the 6.94 lakh companies filing returns of lower taxation and make MSME sector more competitive as compared with large companies. However, bigger firms have shown their disappointment since the proposal for reducing tax rates was to make Indian firms competitive globally and it is the large firms that are competing globally. The Finance Minister foregone revenue estimate of Rs 7,200 crore per annum for this for this measure. Besides, the Finance Minister refrained from removing or reducing Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT), a popular demand from India Inc., but provided a higher period of 15 years for carry forward of future credit claims, instead of the existing 10-year period. “It is not practical to rem
1 comment
Read more

Don't forget to verify your income tax return in August: Here's the process

By
  An ITR return needs to be verified within 120 days of filing of tax return. Now that you have filed your income tax return, remember to verify it because your return filing process is not complete unless you do so. The CBDT has reduced the time limit of ITR verification to 30 days (from 120 days) from the date of return submission. The new rule is applicable for the returns filed online on or after 1st August 2022. E-verification is the most convenient and instant method for verifying your ITR. However, if you prefer not to e-verify, you have the option to verify it by sending a physical copy of the ITR-V. Taxpayers who filed returns by July 31, 2023 but forget to verify their tax returns, will get the following email from the tax department, as per ClearTax. If your ITR is not verified within 30 days of e-filing, it will be considered invalid, and may be liable to pay a Late Fee. Aadhaar OTP | EVC through bank account | EVC through Demat account | Sending duly signed ITR-V through s
Post a Comment
Read more