Skip to main content

'Examine if rate cut benefits reach consumers'

The plea by an NGO cited an RBI report that found banks were not passing benefits of lower rates to customers
The plea alleged that by failing to take action on the petitioner’s repeated requests for justice on behalf of citizens, RBI had deliberately acquiesced in the discrimination by banks in the name of implementing the marginal cost of funds-based lending rate (MCLR) regime. From time to time, RBI has expressed concerns about the reluctance of banks to pass on rate cuts to consumers, and made several attempts to change the way they price their loans. In 2003, RBI introduced the benchmark prime lending rate (BPLR), but this failed to bring in transparency, as a large part of the lending took place at interest rates below the announced BPLRs.
Then came the base rate, which was to be the minimum rate for all loans and calculated on the basis of cost of funds. Individual borrowers were charged a spread over the base rate, which was tweaked to benefit only new borrowers. The drawbacks of these lending rates led RBI to introduce MCLR in April 2016. However, in the absence of a sunset clause on the base rate, banks were slow to migrate their customers to the MCLR regime. In October 2017, a committee under the central bank recommended linking bank lending rates to a market benchmark like T-bills, certificate of deposit or repo rate.
The panel noted that since April 2016, the one-year MCLR had come down by 95 basis points (bps), whereas the repo rate was down by 75 bps, but MCLR had been mostly used for fresh loans. However, the recommendation was opposed by banks, which felt that the regulator should also allow deposit rates to be linked to an external benchmark if it wanted to apply such a benchmark to lending rates. As interest rates started going up after April 2018, the noise around transmission lag abated.
“Benefit of repo rate cut was passed on to fresh borrowers. Existing borrowers did not see a cut in borrowing rates. These switching costs were also charged, prohibiting existing borrowers from switching base rate to MCLR, thereby denying the benefit of lower MCLR to existing borrowers,” said Anul Gupta, sector head, financial sector ratings, Icra Ltd. “Though RBI’s proposal was to link lending rate to external benchmark, in the rising interest rate scenario, it would have led to faster repricing even though the downside was denied to existing borrowers.” Gopika Gopakumar in Mumbai contributed to this story.
The Mint,09th October 2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SC order on RBI circular: More options for banks to tackle defaulting firms

Lenders also have the option of restructuring the loans Lenders to companies which are under stress could now have three options to deal with them if they default on loans: take a haircut as part of a one-time settlement, restructure the loans for a longer tenure as they did when corporate debt restructuring schemes were allowed, or go to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) for redress. These changes in the options available to lenders come, according to PE funds and bank lawyers who are involved in the IBC process, in the wake of the Supreme Court on Tuesday setting aside the 12 February RBI circular, which allowed a 180-day window to banks to resolve a company default.But they can still find a resolution. According to a Reserve Bank of India circular, a loan becomes a non-performing asset when banks cannot find a way of recovering their money in 90 days. In short, banks still have a window to resolve the default. Lenders can take a haircut as part of a one -time settlement of du…

April GST collections at new high despite rate rationalisation in December

Goods and services tax (GST) collection touched a record high in April, exceeding Rs 1 trillion for the third time in four months. The mop-up was 10 per cent higher over the previous year. Gross collection for the month was Rs 1.13 trillion, said the finance ministry. Despite the recent rate rationalisation in December, a rise in collection was reported. Of the total collected, the CGST (central GST) contributed Rs 21,163 crore, the SGST (state GST) Rs 28,801 crore, the IGST (integrated GST) Rs 54,733 crore (including Rs 23,289 crore on import) and cess Rs 9,168 crore (including Rs 1,053 crore on import). After settlement of the IGST and the balance IGST in a 50:50 ratio between the Centre and states on a provisional basis, the CGST stood at Rs 47,533 crore and SGST at Rs 50,776 crore. The CGST target in the Union Budget for 2019-20 is Rs 6.1 trillion. “The April collection indicates the tax base is increasing gradually, with GST getting stabilised with measures such as e-way bills and…

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…