Skip to main content

SEBI Spares AIFs Dollar 20m FDI Floor

MONEY MATTERS Markets regulator clears the air on sponsors and managers of alternative investment funds, saying they come under Sebi regulations and are exempt from FDI rule
Local business houses and financial services groups will find it easier to rope in foreign partners to carry out fund management activities in India with the capital market regulator, Sebi, clearing the fog caused by a new rule.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India has spelt out that sponsors and managers of alternative investment funds, or AIFs, are covered by its regulations — a stand that will spare the sponsors and managers of these funds from a recent government rule that foreign direct investment (FDI) in unregulated financial services cannot be less than Dollar 20 million.
AIFs are money pooling vehicles for venture capital funds, private equity houses, real estate and hedge funds, besides others. Sebi’s AIF regulations issued in 2012 provide a framework for registering funds but not sponsors/managers — which may be entities that are not currently regulated by any of the financial services regulators. However, it made little difference.
This changed with a mid-April notification, which made things difficult for companies, institutions and fund managers planning to tie-up with global partners for AIFs. According to the finance ministry release, minimum FDI for an ‘unregulated fund-based’ service — asset or portfolio management — was Dollar 20 million while the floor FDI for an ‘unregulated non-fund based service’ (such as investment advisor, forex broking etc) was Dollar 2 million.
The rule virtually shut the doors for FDI to most AIFs as very few foreign investor, no matter how large, would bring in as much as $20 million in the manager/sponsor entity. Sebi’s response to the venture capital industry last month that sponsor/manager of AIFs “may considered to be regulated by Sebi to the extent of its activities as sponsor/manager of a Sebi registered AIF,” has cleared the uncertainty, two persons familiar with the development told ET.
“The Sebi clarification has provided considerable clarity to the overseas investors that they will not be required to pump in a minimum capital of $20 million. The ambiguity created by the finance ministry release which treated any unregistered/non-licensed financial services player akin to being unregulated and in turn subjected to an impractical minimum capitalisation, discouraged several Indian fund managers seeking foreign joint venture partners,” said Tejesh Chitlangi, senior partner, IC Universal Legal.
Local fund managers are often keen to bring in a foreign financial services group as foreign partner. First, it could encourage overseas investors to put money into Indian AIFs. Second, the presence of a global investment manager could also attract local high net worth investors and institutions to invest in an AIF. “Indian asset managers are today globally competitive and the clarification by the regulator will raise the interest of global partners in the AIF space in India. It’s a welcome move by Sebi,” said Jyoti Rai, head of channel partners, Edelweiss, Prime Broking & Custody.
The activities of an AIF funds are primarily undertaken by a ‘manager’ who may also be a sponsor. According to Moin Ladha, parter at Khaitan & Co, at the time of considering an AIF registration application, SEBI does consider the qualification, infrastructure and fit and proper status of the sponsor and manager in addition to the main applicant entity. “While this clarification states the actual position Sebi has been maintaining, it does clear any doubts regarding regulated status of the sponsors and managers from an FDI perspective. This clarification in my view is also an indication of Sebi’s intention to improve monitoring of AIF’s and its activities including the source of funds employed by it,” said Ladha.Since 2012, pooling of investments from local or overseas investors has to be through AIFs registered with Sebi.

The Economic Times, New Delhi, 09th July 2018


Popular posts from this blog

RBI rushes in to prop up falling rupee

RBI rushes in to prop up falling rupee India’s central bank reportedly intervened in the currency markets on Monday to prevent a further slide in the local unit, which breached the 67 mark to a dollar for the first time in 15 months amid a widening trade gap and runaway import bills fuelled by high crude-oil prices. Some state-owned banks were seen selling dollars aggressively, interventions that market dealers attributed to the central bank’s strategy to stem the decline of the Indian rupee against the US currency. The rupee is the worst performing among a dozen Asian monetary units in the past three months. It lost 4.25 per cent to the dollar during the period, show data from Bloomberg. On Monday, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is said to have sold about Rs 800 million collectively on the spot and exchange traded futures markets, dealers said. An email sent to RBI remained unanswered until the publication of this report. The currency market has seen such a strong central bank interven…

GST Refund of Rs 20,000 Cr Pending: Exporters’ Body

GST Refund of Rs  20,000 Cr Pending: Exporters’ Body Refund of over Rs 20,000 crore on account of Goods and Services Tax (GST) is pending with the government with more than half the amount stuck as input tax credit, Federation of Indian Export Organisations said on Tuesday. While claims over Rs7,000 crore were cleared in March, the amount was Rs 1,000 crore in April.However, after exporters’ request, the GST council and tax department are organizing a second phase of Special Refund Fortnight starting May 31, which will enable exporters to draw their refunds at a speedy pace. Many exporters have been unable to file the refund of input tax credit due to technical glitches, exports and claim happened in different months. The major challenge lies on ITC refund especially because the process is partly electronic and partly manual which is cumbersome and add to the transaction cost, the exporters’ body said. On IGST, refunds are getting delayed due to airline and shipping companies not submitt…

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…