Skip to main content

SC wants sealing resumed, developers to be blacklisted

Action is always against owner... However, it’s the builders, contractors and architects who violate laws MB LOKUR, Supreme Court judge
The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed the civic bodies to resume sealing and demolishing unauthorised shops and encroachments in the national Capital and gave the Centre two weeks to frame rules to crack down on builders, contractors and architects who violated municipal by-laws while constructing residential complexes. The directive to resume sealing was issued by the bench of justices MB Lokur and Deepak Gupta after attorney general KK Venugopal, appearing for the Union urban development ministry, denied that Land and Development Office (L&DO) of the ministry had instructed the municipal bodies in Delhi not to carry out the drive, as alleged by a court-monitored panel entrusted to oversee the sealing drive in the city.
“Based on the affidavit filed (by Urban development ministry) we direct that there will be no stoppage of sealing or demolition,” the order said. On being told that officers participating in the sealing drive face threats from mobs and residents the bench directed the police to provide adequate security to such teams. “Action should be taken when threats are given to the officers,” the order added. The court also instructed civic agencies to immediately stop construction of buildings where irregular or illegal activity is spotted. Venugopal welcomed the court’s order on pulling up errant builders and contractors.
“Action is always initiated against the owner of the building or flat. However, it’s the builders, contractors and architects who violate laws. By the word ‘action’, we mean you must blacklist them when it is found they have not followed the plan as passed by the corporation. You should keep a track of such builders and if they are found to have broken the law you must deny them permission to construct more buildings,” justice Lokur said. Getamber Anand, chairman of the Confederation of Real Estate Developers Associations of India (CREDAI), said that the court direction to blacklist builders was right. “Every project should be mandatorily registered and monitored and appropriate provisions should be made. The officers who are supposed to discipline constructions should be made accountable and answerable if illegal construction is found,” he said.
Venugopal told the bench that the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) had on July 9 launched a mobile application through which citizens can complain about illegal constructions and encroachments in the city. So far, 431 complaints have been received in the mobile application and action taken on 138 such complaints, he said. The sealing drive in Delhi’s prominent markets -- including Defence Colony, South Extension, Hauz Khas, Amar Colony, Lajpat Nagar and Rajouri Garden -- had triggered a wave of protests among traders across the city. Traders affected by the sealing drive said there was still no clarity on which areas were protected against the drive. “The Supreme Court order will disturb business activities in Delhi. There is great confusion not only among traders but even among government agencies about the status of various areas in Delhi. Some areas are protected under the Master Plan and several others are protected under the Special Territory Act,” said Praveen Khandelwal, secretary general of the Confederation of All India Traders.
The court also asked for Mukesh Suryan, chairman of municipal ward committee, Najafgarh, to appear before the court after it was told that the councillor had allegedly stopped municipal officers from carrying out their statutory duty. Senior advocate Ranjit Kumar, assisting the court in the case, handed over a letter written to him by the Forum of MCD engineers complaining that politicians interfere in their work. Justice Lokur mentioned media reports on how people in Mumbai had died due to potholes and asked the AG whether he saw the photographs of a bus submerged near Minto Road. “What is happening to the governance in this country. Are your officials sleeping?” he asked.
Rajinder Malik, president of the Defence Colony market association, where the first sealing drive was carried out in December last year, said traders were losing hope. “It has almost been seven months and the issue has intensified so much that we have all come to the roads in protest. We are still in the same place waiting for some relief,” Malik said.
The Hindustan Times, 19th July 2018, New Delhi

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New income tax slab and rates for new tax regime FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25) announced in Budget 2023

  Basic exemption limit has been hiked to Rs.3 lakh from Rs 2.5 currently under the new income tax regime in Budget 2023. Further, the income tax slabs in the new tax regime has been changed. According to the announcement, 5 income tax slabs will be there in FY 2023-24, from 6 income tax slabs currently. A rebate under Section 87A has been enhanced under the new tax regime; from the current income level of Rs.5 lakh to Rs.7 lakh. Thus, individuals opting for the new income tax regime and having an income up to Rs.7 lakh will not pay any taxes   The income tax slabs under the new income tax regime will now be as follows: Rs 0 to Rs 3 lakh - 0% tax rate Rs 3 lakh to 6 lakh - 5% Rs 6 lakh to 9 lakh - 10% Rs 9 lakh to Rs 12 lakh - 15% Rs 12 lakh to Rs 15 lakh - 20% Above Rs 15 lakh - 30%   The revised Income tax slabs under new tax regime for FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25)   Income tax slabs under new tax regime Income tax rates under new tax regime O to Rs 3 lakh 0 Rs 3 lakh to Rs 6 lakh 5% Rs 6

Jaitley plans to cut MSME tax rate to 25%

Income tax for companies with annual turnover up to ?50 crore has been reduced to 25% from 30% in order to make Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) companies more viable and also to encourage firms to migrate to a company format. This move will benefit 96% or 6.67 lakh of the 6.94 lakh companies filing returns of lower taxation and make MSME sector more competitive as compared with large companies. However, bigger firms have shown their disappointment since the proposal for reducing tax rates was to make Indian firms competitive globally and it is the large firms that are competing globally. The Finance Minister foregone revenue estimate of Rs 7,200 crore per annum for this for this measure. Besides, the Finance Minister refrained from removing or reducing Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT), a popular demand from India Inc., but provided a higher period of 15 years for carry forward of future credit claims, instead of the existing 10-year period. “It is not practical to rem

Don't forget to verify your income tax return in August: Here's the process

  An ITR return needs to be verified within 120 days of filing of tax return. Now that you have filed your income tax return, remember to verify it because your return filing process is not complete unless you do so. The CBDT has reduced the time limit of ITR verification to 30 days (from 120 days) from the date of return submission. The new rule is applicable for the returns filed online on or after 1st August 2022. E-verification is the most convenient and instant method for verifying your ITR. However, if you prefer not to e-verify, you have the option to verify it by sending a physical copy of the ITR-V. Taxpayers who filed returns by July 31, 2023 but forget to verify their tax returns, will get the following email from the tax department, as per ClearTax. If your ITR is not verified within 30 days of e-filing, it will be considered invalid, and may be liable to pay a Late Fee. Aadhaar OTP | EVC through bank account | EVC through Demat account | Sending duly signed ITR-V through s