Skip to main content

Sebi files appeal against Rs. 210 cr tax demand

Sebi files appeal against Rs. 210 cr tax demand
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has filed an appeal in the goods and services tax (GST) tribunal against a tax demand of Rs210 crore for providing various services in the 2013-16 period, two people familiar with the development said. This follows the failure of talks with the finance ministry officials to waive the tax demand, and greater conviction within the regulator that it has a strong case under the Finance Act. The case pertains to tax liability on services provided by Sebi to entities such as stock exchanges, their members, brokers and investors for processing initial public offerings, debt issues, mutual funds and new fund offers, besides providing informal guidance to firms.
In 2013, the tax department had said these services were not in a ‘negative list’ of nontaxable services and were hence taxable. In February 2013, services rendered by Sebi were not put in negative list. The Union Budget 2016-17 amended the Finance Act, and services of Sebi—as well as those of Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority and Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation—were added to the negative list with prospective effect.
However, this made Sebi liable to pay taxes from April 2013 to April 2016. According to the first of the two people cited above who spoke on condition of anonymity, this comes to about Rs. 300 crore, including interest. “Out of this, the commissioner of GST has passed an order of Rs.130 crore of dues and Rs. 80 crore of interest on 3 May 2018,” the first person said. The order came after three rounds of discussions with finance ministry to waive the tax demand failed, the first person added. At a meeting of its board on 28 March, Sebi directors took up the question of whether the regulator should contest the tax demand or cough up the entire amount.
“The board decided that Sebi has a strong case to contest the tax demand and has filed an appeal in the tribunal against the tax department,” said the second person. The regulator claims these services are not taxable and are exempt under the Sebi Act, he said. Section 25 of the Finance Act states that since the date of Sebi’s constitution to the date of establishment it is not liable to pay wealth tax, income tax or any other tax on their wealth, income, profits or gains derived. An email sent to a spokesperson for Sebi on Tuesday was not answered till press time. “Sebi is a statutory body and services provided by it are statutory in nature. For the government to defend the tax demand, it will need to satisfy three grounds. Whether Sebi is not a government, autonomous body; whether it is providing support services for businesses; and whether Sebi is making a deliberate attempt to avoid taxes. As the answer to all the three questions above is negative, then Sebi does have a very strong case,” said Amit Kumar Sarkar, head-indirect tax, BDO India Llp.
The Mint, 27th June 2018, New Delhi

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...