Skip to main content

Sebi files appeal against Rs. 210 cr tax demand

Sebi files appeal against Rs. 210 cr tax demand
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has filed an appeal in the goods and services tax (GST) tribunal against a tax demand of Rs210 crore for providing various services in the 2013-16 period, two people familiar with the development said. This follows the failure of talks with the finance ministry officials to waive the tax demand, and greater conviction within the regulator that it has a strong case under the Finance Act. The case pertains to tax liability on services provided by Sebi to entities such as stock exchanges, their members, brokers and investors for processing initial public offerings, debt issues, mutual funds and new fund offers, besides providing informal guidance to firms.
In 2013, the tax department had said these services were not in a ‘negative list’ of nontaxable services and were hence taxable. In February 2013, services rendered by Sebi were not put in negative list. The Union Budget 2016-17 amended the Finance Act, and services of Sebi—as well as those of Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority and Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation—were added to the negative list with prospective effect.
However, this made Sebi liable to pay taxes from April 2013 to April 2016. According to the first of the two people cited above who spoke on condition of anonymity, this comes to about Rs. 300 crore, including interest. “Out of this, the commissioner of GST has passed an order of Rs.130 crore of dues and Rs. 80 crore of interest on 3 May 2018,” the first person said. The order came after three rounds of discussions with finance ministry to waive the tax demand failed, the first person added. At a meeting of its board on 28 March, Sebi directors took up the question of whether the regulator should contest the tax demand or cough up the entire amount.
“The board decided that Sebi has a strong case to contest the tax demand and has filed an appeal in the tribunal against the tax department,” said the second person. The regulator claims these services are not taxable and are exempt under the Sebi Act, he said. Section 25 of the Finance Act states that since the date of Sebi’s constitution to the date of establishment it is not liable to pay wealth tax, income tax or any other tax on their wealth, income, profits or gains derived. An email sent to a spokesperson for Sebi on Tuesday was not answered till press time. “Sebi is a statutory body and services provided by it are statutory in nature. For the government to defend the tax demand, it will need to satisfy three grounds. Whether Sebi is not a government, autonomous body; whether it is providing support services for businesses; and whether Sebi is making a deliberate attempt to avoid taxes. As the answer to all the three questions above is negative, then Sebi does have a very strong case,” said Amit Kumar Sarkar, head-indirect tax, BDO India Llp.
The Mint, 27th June 2018, New Delhi

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI deputy governor cautions fintech platform lenders on privacy concerns during loan recovery

  India's digital lending infrastructure has made the loan sanctioning system online. Yet, loan recovery still needs a “feet on the street” approach, Swaminathan J, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at a media event on Tuesday, September 2, according to news agency ANI.According to the ANI report, the deputy governor flagged that fintech operators in the digital lending segment are giving out loans to customers with poor credit profiles and later using aggressive recovery tactics.“While loan sanctioning and disbursement have become increasingly digital, effective collection and recovery still require a 'feet on the street' and empathetic approach. Many fintech platforms operate on a business model that involves extending small-value loans to customers often with poor credit profiles,” Swaminathan J said.   Fintech platforms' business models The central bank deputy governor highlighted that many fintech platforms' business models involve providing sm

Credit card spending growth declines on RBI gaze, stress build-up

  Credit card spends have further slowed down to 16.6 per cent in the current financial year (FY25), following the Reserve Bank of India’s tightening of unsecured lending norms and rising delinquencies, and increased stress in the portfolio.Typically, during the festival season (September–December), credit card spends peak as several credit card-issuing banks offer discounts and cashbacks on e-commerce and other platforms. This is a reversal of trend in the past three financial years stretching to FY21 due to RBI’s restrictions.In the previous financial year (FY24), credit card spends rose by 27.8 per cent, but were low compared to FY23 which surged by 47.5 per cent. In FY22, the spending increased 54.1 per cent, according to data compiled by Macquarie Research.ICICI Bank recorded 4.4 per cent gross credit losses in its FY24 credit card portfolio as against 3.2 per cent year-on-year. SBI Cards’ credit losses in the segment stood at 7.4 per cent in FY24 and 6.2 per cent in FY23, the rep

India can't rely on wealthy to drive growth: Ex-RBI Dy Guv Viral Acharya

  India can’t rely on wealthy individuals to drive growth and expect the overall economy to improve, Viral Acharya, former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Monday.Acharya, who is the C V Starr Professor of Economics in the Department of Finance at New York University’s Stern School of Business (NYU-Stern), said after the Covid-19 pandemic, rural consumption and investments have weakened.We can’t be pumping our growth through the rich and expect that the economy as a whole will do better,” he said while speaking at an event organised by Elara Capital here.f there has to be a trickle-down, it should have actually happened by now,” Acharya said, adding that when the rich keep getting wealthier and wealthier, they have a savings problem.   “The bank account keeps getting bigger, hence they look for financial assets to invest in. India is closed, so our money can't go outside India that easily. So, it has to chase the limited financial assets in the country and