Skip to main content

Retrospective benefits on gratuity not on the cards, says NDA govt

 Retrospective benefits on gratuity not on the cards, says NDA govt
The law was amended to bring parity between public and private sector employees (including PSUs) after the gratuity limit was raised for central government on similar lines
The National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government has decided against passing the benefits under the new gratuity law, which doubles the present maximum payout, with retrospective effect. This is owing to employers fears of a higher payout. The government received several requests from workers’ representatives belonging to public sector units (PSUs) and the private sector for doubling the limit for gratuity payout on par with central government employees. Parliament had passed the Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Bill, 2018, in March this year, in a bid to raise the gratuity limit to Rs 2 million from the Rs 1 million earlier.
 
The law became applicable on March 29, through an official notification. ā€œOn earlier occasions also, the enhancement in gratuity ceiling under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, had been implemented with prospective date only. Further, implementation of the same with retrospective effect will be administratively difficult and employers may not have sufficient liquidity to meet the arrear liabilities,ā€ an official note, prepared by the labour and employment ministry, said. The law was amended to bring parity between public and private sector employees (including PSUs) after the gratuity limit was raised for central government on similar lines, as a part of the Seventh Pay Commission recommendations accepted by the Centre in July 2016.
 
The benefits for the central government employees became effective from 1 June 2016. In case of private and PSU employees, the government had notified the higher gratuity limit with effect from March 29, 2018.The labour and employment ministry received ā€œa large number of representationsā€ from trade unions, individuals and organisations – through the social media and its public grievances portal – calling from making the gratuity law effective from June 1, 2016, as was done in the case of central government employees.
 
However, as noted by the labour ministry, the retrospective benefit arising out of the new gratuity law would have made companies bear the additional burden. Private sector and PSUs already saw an increase in liability for its employees in the previous financial year due to the increase in gratuity ceiling. For instance, as per a Business Standard analysis, 13 public sector banks reported an additional liability of around Rs 59 billion and for all 21 PSBs, the liability could touch Rs 100 billion, according to their audited financial results for 2017-18. Concerned by its impact on the balance sheet of banks, the Reserve Bank of India had in April given a special dispensation, allowing PSBs to spread the liability for additional gratuity payment in four quarters. At present, employees who complete five years of continuous service are eligible to receive gratuity when they leave the organisation.

Before this, the gratuity ceiling was revised from Rs 350,000 to Rs 1 million in 2010 after the Sixth Pay Commission recommendation had raised the limit for central 
government employees. Gratuity is computed at 15 days salary for each completed year of service. This move is quite unlike the stance taken by the government in passing on higher bonus benefits to the working class under a 2015 law that was made applicable retrospectively from April 2014 – drawing the ire of employers who had challenged it in various high courts. The Payments of Bonus Act of 2015, passed by Parliament in December 2015 and notified on January 1, had doubled the statutory bonus paid to employees and made more workers eligible for bonus by raising the salary ceiling under the law from Rs 10,000 a month to Rs 21,000 a month.
 
The Bill was supposed to be effective from April 1, 2015. The then labour minister, Bandaru Dattatreya, had said that it was made applicable from April 2014, following intervention by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.The employers’ organisation had challenged the retrospective bonus law in various courts and at least eight high courts stayed the payment of such benefits.

The Business Standard, New Delhi, 07th June 2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget: Startup sector gets new Fund of Funds, FM to allocate Rs 10K cr

  The Indian startup sector received a boost with Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announcing the establishment of a new fund of funds (FoF) in the Budget 2025. The minister unveiled a fresh FoF with an expanded scope, allocating Rs 10,000 crore. The initial fund of funds announced by the government with an investment of Rs 10,000 crore successfully catalysed commitments worth Rs 91,000 crore, the minister said.   ā€œThe renewal of the Rs 10,000 crore commitment to the Fund of Funds for alternative investment funds (AIFs) is a significant step forward for the Indian startup and investment ecosystem. The initial Rs 10,000 crore commitment catalysed Rs 91,000 crore in investments, and I fully expect this fresh infusion to attract an additional Rs 1 lakh to Rs 1.5 lakh crore in capital,ā€ said Anirudh Damani, managing partner, Artha Venture Funds.   Damani further added that this initiative will provide much-needed growth capital to early-stage startups, further strengthenin...

After RBI rate cut, check latest home loan interest rates of top banks for loans above Rs 75 lakh

  The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has reduced the repo rate by 25 basis points from 6.50% to 6.25% in its monetary policy review as announced on February 7, 2025. After the RBI repo rate cut, banks such as SBI, Canara Bank, PNB, and Union Bank among others have cut their repo linked lending rates. Most other banks are also expected to cut their lending rates in line with the RBI rate cut. After banks cut their lending rates, their home loan borrowers will have to pay less interest. Normally, when a lender cuts the lending rate, borrowers get two options: Either to go for a reduction in EMIs or reduce the tenure of the loan. The second option will help the borrowers clear their home loan outstanding faster. In case, the borrower goes for reduction in EMI then the lower lending rate of the lender would mean lower Equated Monthly Installment (EMI) for borrowers.   EMI is the amount you will pay on a specific date each month till the loan is repaid in full.A repo rate-linked home ...