Skip to main content

Retrospective benefits on gratuity not on the cards, says NDA govt

 Retrospective benefits on gratuity not on the cards, says NDA govt
The law was amended to bring parity between public and private sector employees (including PSUs) after the gratuity limit was raised for central government on similar lines
The National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government has decided against passing the benefits under the new gratuity law, which doubles the present maximum payout, with retrospective effect. This is owing to employers fears of a higher payout. The government received several requests from workers’ representatives belonging to public sector units (PSUs) and the private sector for doubling the limit for gratuity payout on par with central government employees. Parliament had passed the Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Bill, 2018, in March this year, in a bid to raise the gratuity limit to Rs 2 million from the Rs 1 million earlier.
 
The law became applicable on March 29, through an official notification. “On earlier occasions also, the enhancement in gratuity ceiling under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, had been implemented with prospective date only. Further, implementation of the same with retrospective effect will be administratively difficult and employers may not have sufficient liquidity to meet the arrear liabilities,” an official note, prepared by the labour and employment ministry, said. The law was amended to bring parity between public and private sector employees (including PSUs) after the gratuity limit was raised for central government on similar lines, as a part of the Seventh Pay Commission recommendations accepted by the Centre in July 2016.
 
The benefits for the central government employees became effective from 1 June 2016. In case of private and PSU employees, the government had notified the higher gratuity limit with effect from March 29, 2018.The labour and employment ministry received “a large number of representations” from trade unions, individuals and organisations – through the social media and its public grievances portal – calling from making the gratuity law effective from June 1, 2016, as was done in the case of central government employees.
 
However, as noted by the labour ministry, the retrospective benefit arising out of the new gratuity law would have made companies bear the additional burden. Private sector and PSUs already saw an increase in liability for its employees in the previous financial year due to the increase in gratuity ceiling. For instance, as per a Business Standard analysis, 13 public sector banks reported an additional liability of around Rs 59 billion and for all 21 PSBs, the liability could touch Rs 100 billion, according to their audited financial results for 2017-18. Concerned by its impact on the balance sheet of banks, the Reserve Bank of India had in April given a special dispensation, allowing PSBs to spread the liability for additional gratuity payment in four quarters. At present, employees who complete five years of continuous service are eligible to receive gratuity when they leave the organisation.

Before this, the gratuity ceiling was revised from Rs 350,000 to Rs 1 million in 2010 after the Sixth Pay Commission recommendation had raised the limit for central 
government employees. Gratuity is computed at 15 days salary for each completed year of service. This move is quite unlike the stance taken by the government in passing on higher bonus benefits to the working class under a 2015 law that was made applicable retrospectively from April 2014 – drawing the ire of employers who had challenged it in various high courts. The Payments of Bonus Act of 2015, passed by Parliament in December 2015 and notified on January 1, had doubled the statutory bonus paid to employees and made more workers eligible for bonus by raising the salary ceiling under the law from Rs 10,000 a month to Rs 21,000 a month.
 
The Bill was supposed to be effective from April 1, 2015. The then labour minister, Bandaru Dattatreya, had said that it was made applicable from April 2014, following intervention by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.The employers’ organisation had challenged the retrospective bonus law in various courts and at least eight high courts stayed the payment of such benefits.

The Business Standard, New Delhi, 07th June 2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...