Skip to main content

New Accounting Rules may Deal Rs 20kcr Blow to Builder

New Accounting Rules may Deal Rs 20kcr Blow to Builder
Realtors will have to write back profits retrospectively on all incomplete projects
The implementation of a new accounting standard from this fiscal will force listed real estate companies to write back profits made over the past few years from all projects that are not complete. That could hit the balance sheets of companies, many of which are still recovering from their debt-fuelled spending binges of the past decade or so. Developers have written to the government seeking relief.
Under IND-AS 115, in line with international norms, listed real estate companies will have to write back about ?20,000 crore from their net worth in the current fiscal itself, said a top industry executive, asking not to be named.The new accounting standard took effect in April.Real estate companies will have to switch to the Project Completion Method from the existing Percentage Completion Method (POC).
Under the previous norm, home buyer payments toward the purchase of under construction flats were declared as turnover by companies and net income generated from such projects was treated as profit.
“The developers would need to write back the profit booked till date on all the ongoing projects which are not 100% complete under the new rule,” Adhidev Chattopadhyay, research analyst with ICICI Securities, said in a recent report. “This would happen in the first quarter on a retrospective basis and would lead to a hit on the net worth and lead to a temporary spike in companies’ debt-equity ratio.”
Under the new rule, home buyer payments toward ongoing projects will be treated as advances or loans and not as income from sales.“Any change from Percentage of Completion (POC) accounting to accounting on Completion of Project would have a very significant revenues and cost reversal as at the opening balance sheet and re-recognition of the same in ensuing period,” the National Real Estate Development Council (Naredco) said in a submission to the ministry of corporate affairs.
‘Impact on Credit Rating’
“New accounting norms will impact not only revenue recognition but also have consequential impact on net profits and net worth of a real estate company,” said Saumil Shah, partner, Dhruva Advisors.ATS Infrastructure chairman and managing director Getamber Anand said the government should have grandfathered the ongoing projects till March 2018 so that the industry had time to adopt the new norms.
According to experts, India largest real estate firm DLF will have to write back profit of a significant amount from its net worth. “DLF may have to take a one-time hit on its net worth in Q1 FY 19 with a writeback of profit booked from existing projects not 100% complete under IND-AS 115 definitions,” said Chattopadhyay. DLF declined to comment.
Lodha Developers, which filed its draft red herring prospectus in April this year and is currently conducting roadshows, may have to revise the document and restate financial results, said a top investment banker. The company plans to raise about Rs 6,700 crore, including a fresh issue of Rs 3,750 crore. Lodha Developers declined to comment.
It is expected to write back a substantial amount of profit from its net worth (Rs 659 crore). This will have a direct bearing on the debt-equity ratio of the company — it has debt of Rs17,973 crore.“The new accounting standard will have an impact on borrowing capacity of the company or credit rating of a company and therefore an impact on the borrowing cost,” said the banker cited above. “Further, an impending IPO may get potentially impacted due to the changes in the accounting norms.”
Considering the applicable legal framework in India, including the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA), it may be difficult for such entities to recognise revenue over the period of construction, said a top official at one of the top four consulting firms. “This change will significantly impact revenue recognition of real estate developers. This may also lead to higher tax outflow considering prevailing tax provisions (primarily minimum alternate tax) in India for such entities,” he added.

The Economic Times, New Delhi, 11th May 2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector Dealers with turnover of Rs 2 crore and above covered; industry says threshold too low The central government has notified the money laundering rules for the gems and jewellery sector with immediate effect. Now, any entity deals in precious metals, precious stones, or other high-value goods and has a turnover of Rs 2 crore or more in a financial year will be covered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, 2002). The limit of Rs 2 crore would be calculated on the basis of the previous year’s turnover, said the notification. The directorate general of goods and service tax intelligence has been appointed under the Act. Sources said the government’s move to apply the PMLA to the jewellery sector was a fallout of income-tax raids on jewellers soon after demonetisation last November, when it was found that they sold gold and jewellery at a huge premium and accepted old currency notes as payment. The notification, issued on Augus…

Confusion over branded food GST

Confusion over branded food GST The GST Council's statement over the weekend on applying tax on branded food items has left most of the trade confused.

Even though the Council has not changed the rates on food -0 per cent on unbranded stuff and 5 per cent on brands -many small traders who didn't levy GST earlier said they could come under the 5 per cent slab after the clarification.

While they predicted some increase in consumer prices, large players said they can absorb GST in many ways and keep prices steady.

"Trade is confused and hence on behalf of our chamber, we have asked our members to go ahead and charge 5 per cent GST," said Sushil Sureka, general secretary of the Ahilya Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Indore.

The statement clarifying the application of GST came after some businesses were found deregistering their brands and selling under corporate brand name without paying tax, after the Council exempted unbranded food from the new all-encompassing indirec…