Skip to main content

Dealers of Imported Sports Goods Under Taxman’s Lens

Dealers of Imported Sports Goods Under Taxman’s Lens
DRI probes whether marketing spends like sponsoring events and roping in brand ambassadors be added to total import cost
Does getting a sport star to endorse a brand or sponsoring a sports event be treated as imports?
The intelligence arm of the tax department seems to think so. They content many dealers of imported sports goods and equipment unvalued their imports and sign contracts that obligates them to plough a sizeable amount of the value into endorsements and sponsorship deals.
Revenue sleuths are investigating whether Indian dealers who import golf kits, table tennis rackets, badminton rackets and shuttlecocks must treat any marketing spend like sponsoring events and roping in brand ambassadors as imports.Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) has initiated investigations against dealers of imported golf kits, badminton and table tennis goods of brands like Callaway, Ping, Yonex, Donex, Li Ning and Tietlist. In some cases, notices have been issued and dealers — who typically have territories assigned to them within India — have been asked to cough up additional taxes.
In most cases this would lead to about 28% hit on all the marketing spend of the dealers.
Dealers, who tend to sponsor events and players in their respective regions, claim the demand doesn’t have merit as they don’t have any connection to the multinationals and such valuation scrutiny can only take place between related parties.
“When a dealer imports goods from a sports manufacturer based outside India, it is possible that the transactions are not between related parties and so there is no need for scrutinising the valuation. Moreover, promotional expense incurred by the dealer, either through sponsorship of sport personalities or events, cannot be construed as the import cost for levying customs duty,” said Abhishek A Rastogi, partner, Khaitan & Co The taxman is claiming that many multinationals are undervaluing imports and marketing spend is nothing but a mandatory requirement embedded in the cost to hoodwink Indian authorities.
Tax experts said whether this argument of the taxman stands would depend on documentation or contracts between Indian dealers and the multinational.The key is whether payments under investigation would qualify as ‘condition of sale’ as part of the contractual obligation of the seller: to such extent the essence of agreement or documentation would be crucial. This would typically be a fact based issue,” said Suresh Nair, Partner, EY India.
Tax experts say that not just contracts but even an email communication between Indian dealers and multinational could be a cause of worry.“The investigators would look at all documentation including emails and if there is a demand and or communication from the multinational about the marketing spend, that could be considered condition for sale. To levy these taxes DRI has to prove that there the marketing spend was one of the conditions for the import of goods,” said Sachin Menon, national head of indirect tax, KPMG.
For instance, suppose Saina Nehwal endorses a Japanese badminton brand, or an Indian dealer of an American golf kit manufacturer sponsors a Noida amateur golf tournament—DRI is demanding that the cost must be added to cost of imports and taxed.In most cases, the sponsorship costs or paying a brand ambassador are incurred by a local dealer. If a dealer imports goods worth Rs 1,000, and spends ?100 on sponsoring a sports star, should he be subjected to customs duty on Rs 1,000?
Tax officials are claiming that the actual cost of import is actually Rs1,100 as Rs100 spent on sponsorships was a prerequisite for the import.
Tax experts point out that the marketing or promotional spend can be subjected to taxes only in situations when the contract between the Indian dealer and the multinational specifies this as a condition of sale. “The promotional expenses can be added to the import cost only when these costs are condition of sale. In most of these transactions, the responsibility of incurring the promotional cost is on the importer and hence the condition of sale is not kicked,” added Rastogi.
The Economic Times, New Delhi, 13th June 2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …