Skip to main content

Over 1,600 merger cases pile up before NCLT as insolvency takes precedence

Over 1,600 merger cases pile up before NCLT as insolvency takes precedence
Sources say the time taken by the tribunal to approve mergers is more than what high courts used to take

With the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) gaining precedence before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), merger and amalgamation cases are beginning to pile up before the quasi-judicial body set up to fast-track issues related to domestic corporates.

Industry players say several companies, particularly small- and medium-sized, which had requisitioned for approval of mergers, have been facing challenges as the Bench is preoccupied with IBC cases.Some of these firms are said to have approached market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India and Ministry of Corporate Affairs seeking an intervention.

Earlier, companies had to approach high courts to seek approval for any merger or scheme of arrangement. Now, the NCLT is the judicial body for approving such schemes.The rationale behind this move was to fast-track such approvals; however, sources say the time taken by the tribunal is more than what high courts used to take.

IBC cases have taken precedence as the government focuses on addressing the bad loan issue plaguing the banking sector. Also, the Reserve Bank of India recently sent out a directive which said that if a debtor defaulted on more than Rs 20 billion, its case would have to be taken up by the NCLT within 15 days. As a result, the tribunal might be giving priority to insolvency matters over other cases, said a banking expert.

Legal experts are of view that the government should create an ecosystem in advance to ensure the tribunal does not get bogged down with multiple legislation. “It is true that Parliament has burdened the NCLT with multiple legislations. At the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal level, even the Competition Act gets added. Before creating a jurisdiction, one has to plan and model for capacity to handle it, but we singularly fail to adopt an empirical approach. What we now see is an outcome of that approach to policymaking,” said Somasekhar Sundaresan, an independent counsel.

The Centre should understand that technology, human resources, and real estate are the three pillars for running a court. “All of this requires planning before a law is made creating a jurisdiction. But this is never done,” he added.

According to government data, 1,630 cases of merger and amalgamation are pending before the tribunal as on January 31, 2018. “A total of 9,073 cases are under consideration in the NCLT, including 1,630 cases of merger and amalgamation, 2,511 cases of insolvency, and 4,932 cases under other sections of the Companies Act,” Minister of State for Corporate Affairs P P Chaudhary informed the Rajya Sabha in March.

Business Standard, New Delhi, 17th May,2018
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector Dealers with turnover of Rs 2 crore and above covered; industry says threshold too low The central government has notified the money laundering rules for the gems and jewellery sector with immediate effect. Now, any entity deals in precious metals, precious stones, or other high-value goods and has a turnover of Rs 2 crore or more in a financial year will be covered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, 2002). The limit of Rs 2 crore would be calculated on the basis of the previous year’s turnover, said the notification. The directorate general of goods and service tax intelligence has been appointed under the Act. Sources said the government’s move to apply the PMLA to the jewellery sector was a fallout of income-tax raids on jewellers soon after demonetisation last November, when it was found that they sold gold and jewellery at a huge premium and accepted old currency notes as payment. The notification, issued on Augus…

Confusion over branded food GST

Confusion over branded food GST The GST Council's statement over the weekend on applying tax on branded food items has left most of the trade confused.

Even though the Council has not changed the rates on food -0 per cent on unbranded stuff and 5 per cent on brands -many small traders who didn't levy GST earlier said they could come under the 5 per cent slab after the clarification.

While they predicted some increase in consumer prices, large players said they can absorb GST in many ways and keep prices steady.

"Trade is confused and hence on behalf of our chamber, we have asked our members to go ahead and charge 5 per cent GST," said Sushil Sureka, general secretary of the Ahilya Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Indore.

The statement clarifying the application of GST came after some businesses were found deregistering their brands and selling under corporate brand name without paying tax, after the Council exempted unbranded food from the new all-encompassing indirec…