Skip to main content

Sebi could make 'pre-trade' allocation mandatory in Indian markets

Sebi could make 'pre-trade' allocation mandatory in Indian markets
Pooled investors such as MFs or FPIs will have to state schemes under which they are acquiring shares
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) will soon issue a set of rules for trade allocations of institutional investors such as mutual funds (MFs) or foreign portfolio investors (FPIs).
Sources say Sebi could make ‘pre-trade’ allocation mandatory. Currently, pooled investors, including MFs and FPIs, are allowed to buy blocks of shares from the market without assigning these to a specific scheme. Under the new framework, funds will have to determine beforehand how much of the purchased shares would go into each scheme.
The move comes after several MFs were reportedly allotting shares to their schemes on an arbitrary basis, often giving preference to flagship schemes. There is no uniform framework for allotment of shares to schemes. Some institutions currently apply scheme-wise for allocations in public issues; others do at a fund house or investment manager level.
Sources say Sebi has encountered several scenarios, especially during the anchor allotment of Initial Public Offers (IPOs) of equity, where fund houses have allotted the bulk of shares issued to their best-performing schemes, putting other schemes in a disadvantageous situation.
Similar instances have been found even in the case of qualified institutional placements or bulk deals. Such a practice is held to short-change investors of some schemes within a fund. Sources say Sebi has been communicating to big-size FPIs and MFs on the issue. "The regulator is trying to standardise practises, so that it is the same across the board," said a person with direct knowledge of the issue.The person added that there often are problems with allocations in the case of IPOs and other public issues, as there is no way to know how much one might be allotted. The situation becomes tricky if, for example, the allocation is more than expected. A scheme might not be in a position to absorb the entire amount.

Pre-trade allocation could be implemented in two ways, hard or soft. In the first, fund houses will have to place separate orders for each scheme. In soft pre-trade allocation, brokers executing the orders will be given instructions beforehand as to how much of the equity purchased will go to each scheme. Regulators globally prefer hard pre-trade allocation, since the other is prone to misuse.
 
FPIs against
 
FPIs have already expressed reservations over adopting such practises. Their lobby, Asia Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (Asifma), has written to Sebi to exempt foreign funds from the purview of the proposed rules, arguing it clashes with the fiduciary responsibility of their fund managers.
 
Sebi could make 'pre-trade' allocation mandatory in Indian markets In certain scenarios, it is also in conflict with the laws of their home jurisdiction. For instance, fund managers in some European jurisdictions have a duty to allocate shares among various schemes at an equitable price. However, if the trades are done in multiple blocks, the entry price might be different for each scheme.
 
“If transparency is required by regulators at the fund account level on a pre-trade basis, the only way would be to place orders directly in the name of each fund account, with full transparency at the ultimate beneficiary level. The result would be different execution prices for the different fund accounts, since orders get filled at different times. The fund manager would then be forced to allocate different prices to fund account clients, which would be in breach of the fiduciary duty for equitable pricing as defined in their offering memoranda,” Asifma said in the letter to Sebi.
 
Trade allocation has been a controversial topic of debate in Western markets, too. In 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the US came up with a specific trade allocation framework. The regulations were enacted after SEC found fund managers and investment advisors were allocating all the profitable trades to their proprietary books, while dumping less profitable trades in less favoured accounts. Under SEC’s new framework, providing an equitable entry price became the duty of a fund manager or investment advisor.
 
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 26th April 2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New income tax slab and rates for new tax regime FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25) announced in Budget 2023

  Basic exemption limit has been hiked to Rs.3 lakh from Rs 2.5 currently under the new income tax regime in Budget 2023. Further, the income tax slabs in the new tax regime has been changed. According to the announcement, 5 income tax slabs will be there in FY 2023-24, from 6 income tax slabs currently. A rebate under Section 87A has been enhanced under the new tax regime; from the current income level of Rs.5 lakh to Rs.7 lakh. Thus, individuals opting for the new income tax regime and having an income up to Rs.7 lakh will not pay any taxes   The income tax slabs under the new income tax regime will now be as follows: Rs 0 to Rs 3 lakh - 0% tax rate Rs 3 lakh to 6 lakh - 5% Rs 6 lakh to 9 lakh - 10% Rs 9 lakh to Rs 12 lakh - 15% Rs 12 lakh to Rs 15 lakh - 20% Above Rs 15 lakh - 30%   The revised Income tax slabs under new tax regime for FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25)   Income tax slabs under new tax regime Income tax rates under new tax regime O to Rs 3 lakh 0 Rs 3 lakh to Rs 6 lakh 5% Rs 6

Jaitley plans to cut MSME tax rate to 25%

Income tax for companies with annual turnover up to ?50 crore has been reduced to 25% from 30% in order to make Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) companies more viable and also to encourage firms to migrate to a company format. This move will benefit 96% or 6.67 lakh of the 6.94 lakh companies filing returns of lower taxation and make MSME sector more competitive as compared with large companies. However, bigger firms have shown their disappointment since the proposal for reducing tax rates was to make Indian firms competitive globally and it is the large firms that are competing globally. The Finance Minister foregone revenue estimate of Rs 7,200 crore per annum for this for this measure. Besides, the Finance Minister refrained from removing or reducing Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT), a popular demand from India Inc., but provided a higher period of 15 years for carry forward of future credit claims, instead of the existing 10-year period. “It is not practical to rem

Don't forget to verify your income tax return in August: Here's the process

  An ITR return needs to be verified within 120 days of filing of tax return. Now that you have filed your income tax return, remember to verify it because your return filing process is not complete unless you do so. The CBDT has reduced the time limit of ITR verification to 30 days (from 120 days) from the date of return submission. The new rule is applicable for the returns filed online on or after 1st August 2022. E-verification is the most convenient and instant method for verifying your ITR. However, if you prefer not to e-verify, you have the option to verify it by sending a physical copy of the ITR-V. Taxpayers who filed returns by July 31, 2023 but forget to verify their tax returns, will get the following email from the tax department, as per ClearTax. If your ITR is not verified within 30 days of e-filing, it will be considered invalid, and may be liable to pay a Late Fee. Aadhaar OTP | EVC through bank account | EVC through Demat account | Sending duly signed ITR-V through s