Skip to main content

RBI may loosen NPA norms to let banks breathe easy

RBI may loosen NPA norms to let banks breathe easy 
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) may relax some of the stringent norms for treatment of bad loans that it announced in February without diluting their spirit, said two officials aware of the development. The finance ministry has made a case for providing some relief, especially for small and medium enterprises, given that the tighter rules could force defaulters into rapid bankruptcy, which could dent jobs generation, they said. 
The one-day, non-performing asset (NPA) classification norm may be extended to 30 days and the requirement that a resolution plan has to be approved by all lenders could be lowered to 75%, they said. This will mean that only if any amount is due for more than 30 days will it be considered a default. 
Under new rules announced by RBI in February, even a one-day delay would be considered a default. “The RBI is having a relook — we expect some relief without diluting the spirit of the norms, which is to ensure that promoters do not… delay the resolution process through IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code),” he said.
Both officials said this would not constitute a climbdown by the RBI, but a realignment of its position without pushing banks to the brink. The central bank had defended the norms before a Rajya Sabha committee on subordinate legislation with regard to different aspects of NPAs last week. 
The RBI reasons that the insolvency law was working fine and there was no need for any other mechanism. “Their (government) view is that it should not lead to job losses, mostly in small and medium enterprises. It is expected that the RBI may soften its stance before the end of this month,” the second official said. The RBI reasons that the insolvency law was working fine and there was no need for any other mechanism. 
“Their (government) view is that it should not lead to job losses, mostly in small and medium enterprises. It is expected that the RBI may soften its stance before the end of this month,” the second official said. The RBI had on February 12 scrapped the corporate debt restructuring (CDR), strategic debt restructuring (SDR), scheme for sustainable structuring of stressed assets (S4A) and the joint lenders’ forum (JLF) that were used by banks to restructure debt defaults as the IBC process had settled into place. 
Simultaneously, the new ‘Resolution of Stressed Assets-Revised Framework’ called on lenders to identify assets “immediately on default”, beginning with loans on which any amount was due from one to 30 days. Principal economic adviser Sanjeev Sanyal is said to have issued a strongly worded note criticising the changes, especially the one-day rule. 
The new rules also require banks to inform the Central Repository of Information on Large Credits (CRILC) on a weekly basis of defaults by all borrowers in excess of `5 crore. This could mean that payments delayed for even a few days could spiral into a bigger problem for borrowers if the default status became public. 
The government and bankers are of the view that the new norms would lower the chances of reviving stressed assets even further. Banks have also said that in some cases payments from various state authorities were delayed and allowing a 30-day period will not dilute the spirit of the guidelines. 
The other relief, the officials said, may come in the form of common guidelines issued for resolution of stressed assets that will have the Indian Banks’ Association’s approval. RBI had directed that all lenders must put in place board-approved policies for the resolution of stressed assets. 
“Now every board could have a different policy and that would impact cases of consortium loans,” said one of the officials cited above. The possibility of common or broader guidelines is being examined, he said. 
With regard to power sector loans, lending consortiums include non-banking financial institutions (NBFCs) such as Power Finance Corp and these new broader guidelines may also take care of them. “The existing guidelines exclude NBFCs,” he said. 
The Economic Times, New Delhi, 16th April 2018


Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …