Skip to main content

Limits notified for tax breaks to angel investors

Limits notified for tax breaks to angel investors
The notification says start-ups may avail of the tax concession only if total investment, including funding from angel investors does not exceed Rs 100 mn
The government announced it had exempted investments by individuals in some categories of start-ups from the so-called ‘angel tax’.The notification says start-ups may avail of the tax concession only if total investment, including funding from angel investors (those who make the initial equity investment) does not exceed Rs 100 million.
The said tax, under Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act, provides that where a closely held company issues its shares at a price more than its fair market value, the amount it gets in excess of this value will be charged to tax as income from other sources, to the tune of 30 per cent.
Concerns were expressed over the possibility of investment into the start-up system being discouraged by this; also, of harassment by tax officials.“Genuine angel investors should not be taxed. This notification, as well as the follow-up notification from the department of revenue, will provide the mechanism for this to happen,” said Ramesh Abhishek, secretary, department of industrial policy and promotion (DIPP). “We have been told 300-400 start-ups normally get angel funding in a year.” His department oversees the regulatory framework for start-ups
However, after the latest notification, only angel investors with average return income of Rs 2.5 million for the past three years or a net worth of Rs 20 million are eligible for 100 per cent tax exemption on investment into start-ups above the fair market value.Also, only investors who have funded start-ups that have been certified by the government’s inter-ministerial board (IMB) will be eligible, the official added. In other words, the majority of such investment gets no relief.
IMB recognises start-ups for the purpose of providing tax benefits. However, those incorporated before April 1, 2016, are not eligible for such breaks and will, therefore, also not be eligible for exemption from the angel tax. Only 88 start-ups have been extended tax benefits till date, of 8,765 ventures that had applied for it since January 2016
“The positive is that the govt is working to help address the issue. The need of the hour is to make it less, not more, onerous and bureaucratic. Else, we could stifle a growing start-up eco-system,” said Padmaja Ruparel, president, Indian Angel Network.
Start-ups will continue to enjoy income tax benefits for three out of a block of seven consecutive assessment years. In the case of start-ups in the biotechnology sector (including medical devices), the period shall be up to 10 years from the date of incorporation or registration, up from the earlier five years. Abhishek said the government was not looking to further change the definition of a start-up.
IMB itself has now been given specific legal sanctity. It will have eight members from various government departments, under the convenorship of the additional secretary, DIPP. Also, representatives from the ministries of corporate affairs, electronics and information technology, department of science and technology and the Central Board of Direct Taxes, among others.It will also operate under specific time-based guidelines to certify start-ups, Abhishek said. The IMB was set up in 2016, to provide an impetus to start-ups
The  Business Standard, New Delhi, 13th April 2018


Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …