Skip to main content

E-way bill may fail to deliver the goods, fear etail firms

E-way bill may fail to deliver the goods, fear etail firms 
With days left for the rollout of the intra-state e-way bill on February 1, several logistics and ecommerce companies are seeking clarifications on the new system, fearing operational inefficiencies and supply-chain disruptions. These companies have written to GST Council, particularly seeking clarity on a notification regarding a second layer of e-way bill generation for goods valued at less than Rs 50,000 — a range that accounts for abulk of all ecommerce shipments. 
The e-way bill is an electronic permit with detailed information on the goods being transported. “In such cases where the consignor has not generated the e-way bill, and the value of that shipment exceeds Rs 50,000, the transporter is obligated to generate e-way bill based on invoice, bill of supply, or delivery challan provided by the consignor,” the companies have said in their letter, which EThas reviewed. 
Ecommerce firms fear a massive load on operational efficiencies and undue delays in delivery if an additional generation of the e-way bill, beyond the one done at the origin, is to be implemented, given that at least 70% of ecommerce orders are priced below Rs 50,000. “Operationally, since consignors would not be required to create eway bills if their individual shipment is below ?50,000, e-way bills would need to be generated on the spot when transporter comes to pick up shipment, ” the companies have written. 
CBEC Issued FAQ
“Several small shipments during pickup would mean transporter would have to spend time generating several e-way bills on the spot. This would put a severe strain on operations, increase cases of faulty declarations, and lead to considerable delays,” the letter said. 
While the Central Board of Excise and Customs has issued an FAQ clarifying that a second e-way bill in case of smaller consignments would not be necessary, the clarification has failed to be recognised on ground with states such as Karnataka and Maharashtra continuing to seek generation of the bill from transporters at state borders. 
It will stall the entire delivery process for the ecommerce sector where a bulk of the orders are under the Rs 50,000 mark. Our logistics partners are now refusing to take on deliveries for consignments less than Rs 50,000 without e-way bill at origin,” said a senior executive at a leading ecommerce firm. 
Experts believe the problem, while impacting several industries, will be most crucial for ecommerce companies given their short delivery timelines for lowticket items. “The FAQ clarifies it but the problem is evidently in the implementation on ground,” said Manish Saigal, managing director at logistics consulting firm Alvarez & Marsal. “In my view, the underlined e-way bills that are being carried in the truck are sufficient for the purpose of reconciliation and there is no need for a transporter to have another eway bill.” 
Experts believe the exemption for goods valued below Rs 50,000 was introduced to help the ecommerce industry and a bill requiring modifications and additional generations through the several layers of transportation will defeat the benefit envisaged for these companies. Ecommerce firms including Flipkart, Amazon, Paytm Mall and Snapdeal, which also undertake shipping on behalf of several merchants, are likely to lose that benefit if the e-way bill implementation is not de-weeded. 
“We are seeking clarity if we can also generate e-way bills on behalf of the seller and if our courier partners can generate the Part-A (at origin) of the e-way bill,” Amit Sinha, chief operating officer at Paytm Mall, told ET. “We believe the best way forward is to either allow ecommerce operators to generate e-way bill Part-A or allow the logistics partner to generate both parts of the e-way bill. This way, the seller will not be impacted with additional operational burden.” 
Logistics companies believe a large part of the problem can be solved with prudent adoption and use of technology at all levels of the transportation system. “E-way bills in the past have had very limited application, at best about 10% of shipments. Now they will have to generate this at scale. So the government needs to make this very scalable as a process,” said Rajesh Yabaji, chief executive of logistics firm Blackbuck, which has launched a website to enable this transition of the logistics industry into the e-way bill regime. 
Ecommerce firms, in their letter to the GST Council, have also sought on-ground support in the form of a dedicated officer in each circle of every state, to whom a transporter can reach out to and inform when technology-related issues create challenges for e-way bill generation. This, they believe, will help significantly trim down teething troubles when the bill is implemented. 
The Economic Times, New Delhi, 03rd March 2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New income tax slab and rates for new tax regime FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25) announced in Budget 2023

  Basic exemption limit has been hiked to Rs.3 lakh from Rs 2.5 currently under the new income tax regime in Budget 2023. Further, the income tax slabs in the new tax regime has been changed. According to the announcement, 5 income tax slabs will be there in FY 2023-24, from 6 income tax slabs currently. A rebate under Section 87A has been enhanced under the new tax regime; from the current income level of Rs.5 lakh to Rs.7 lakh. Thus, individuals opting for the new income tax regime and having an income up to Rs.7 lakh will not pay any taxes   The income tax slabs under the new income tax regime will now be as follows: Rs 0 to Rs 3 lakh - 0% tax rate Rs 3 lakh to 6 lakh - 5% Rs 6 lakh to 9 lakh - 10% Rs 9 lakh to Rs 12 lakh - 15% Rs 12 lakh to Rs 15 lakh - 20% Above Rs 15 lakh - 30%   The revised Income tax slabs under new tax regime for FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25)   Income tax slabs under new tax regime Income tax rates under new tax regime O to Rs 3 lakh 0 Rs 3 lakh to Rs 6 lakh 5% Rs 6

Jaitley plans to cut MSME tax rate to 25%

Income tax for companies with annual turnover up to ?50 crore has been reduced to 25% from 30% in order to make Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) companies more viable and also to encourage firms to migrate to a company format. This move will benefit 96% or 6.67 lakh of the 6.94 lakh companies filing returns of lower taxation and make MSME sector more competitive as compared with large companies. However, bigger firms have shown their disappointment since the proposal for reducing tax rates was to make Indian firms competitive globally and it is the large firms that are competing globally. The Finance Minister foregone revenue estimate of Rs 7,200 crore per annum for this for this measure. Besides, the Finance Minister refrained from removing or reducing Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT), a popular demand from India Inc., but provided a higher period of 15 years for carry forward of future credit claims, instead of the existing 10-year period. “It is not practical to rem

Don't forget to verify your income tax return in August: Here's the process

  An ITR return needs to be verified within 120 days of filing of tax return. Now that you have filed your income tax return, remember to verify it because your return filing process is not complete unless you do so. The CBDT has reduced the time limit of ITR verification to 30 days (from 120 days) from the date of return submission. The new rule is applicable for the returns filed online on or after 1st August 2022. E-verification is the most convenient and instant method for verifying your ITR. However, if you prefer not to e-verify, you have the option to verify it by sending a physical copy of the ITR-V. Taxpayers who filed returns by July 31, 2023 but forget to verify their tax returns, will get the following email from the tax department, as per ClearTax. If your ITR is not verified within 30 days of e-filing, it will be considered invalid, and may be liable to pay a Late Fee. Aadhaar OTP | EVC through bank account | EVC through Demat account | Sending duly signed ITR-V through s