Skip to main content

Investing in equity mutual funds may get cheaper

Investing in equity mutual funds may get cheaper
Investing in equity mutual funds is set to get cheaper. The Securities and Exchange Board of India may soon ask mutual funds to cut an expense fee they charge investors and this will be taken up in the next Sebi board meet on March 28. Along with the recently-introduced separate fee restriction for selling schemes in smaller towns this could end up reducing cost of investing in equity mutual fund schemes by as much as 20%. 
The mutual fund industry is now allowed to charge 20 basis points to every scheme. This was introduced in 2012 as compensation for the loss that the industry incurred for not being allowed to use the proceeds they made from exit loads — a fee that mutual funds charged investors for premature withdrawal. 
Now, Sebi wants to reduce this fee of 20 basis points to 5 basis points. The proposal was discussed in the Mutual Fund Advisory Committee, appointed by the regulator, held late in February, said three people familiar with the matter. “Sebi is of the view that 20 basis points for this purpose is too high. It felt that this fee has to be brought down to 5 basis points to reduce the overall cost of investing in equity mutual funds,” said one of the three people quoted above. 
The plan comes close on the heels of a recent decision by Sebi to link another fee to inflows from smaller towns. Currently, mutual funds are allowed to charge an additional 30 basis points of the scheme corpus if fresh inflows from towns beyond the top 15 cities are at least 30% of gross fresh inflows or constitute 15% of the scheme’s average assets. The latest circular applicable from April 01 had made it mandatory for fund houses to gather these flows from towns beyond the top 30 cities for them to charge 30 basis points. 
Industry executives said none of assets managers in the 42-member-strong domestic mutual fund industry meet this criteria fully. “In a way, it was a master stroke to reduce the total expense ratio because no fund house will be able to meet this,” said the chief executive with a large mutual fund. 
Total expense ratio is the amount that mutual funds charge investors to manage their money. The average total expense ratio for most equity funds are in the range of 2.25%-2.50% every year depending on the size of the scheme. Bigger schemes mostly charge lower total expense ratio. The proposal to cut the fee from 20 basis points to 5 basis points and the restrictions to charge 30 basis points will reduce the total expense ratio by 30-45 basis points. This means a scheme, whose expense ratio is 2.25%, may have to lower the total annual fee to as low as 1.8%. 
The moves will lower cost for investors but will deal a double whammy to the mutual fund industry with assets under management of Rs 22,00,000 crore. Industry executives estimate open ended equity schemes manage roughly Rs 600,000 crore of investor money. If the total expense ratio is lowered by 45 basis, the revenue loss for the industry could be as much as Rs 2,700 crore. Industry executives said the moves are likely to result in lower commissions for mutual fund distributors too. 
“Mutual funds will be left with no choice but to pass on some of the pain to distributors. Else, our margins will be hit badly,” said the chief executive with a large mutual fund quoted above. 

The Economic Times, New Delhi, 15th March 2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...