Skip to main content

SEBI agrees to transfer Rs 16.7 billion of surplus funds to government

SEBI agrees to transfer Rs 16.7 billion of surplus funds to government
Extra funds with regulatory bodies have been a contentious issue for year.
Capital markets regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), has agreed to transfer Rs 16.7 billion of its surplus funds to the government. The Centre has been eyeing these resources, which would enable it to reduce the fiscal deficit. The move, however, was seen as contentious as it potentially amounted to an infringement on the independence of the regulatory body. “Sebi has agreed to the long-pending government demand to transfer surplus funds with it into a public account,” said a source.
The surplus funds with Sebi — and over a dozen other regulators such as the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Irdai) and Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) — were pointed out in a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG). According to a 2017 report of the CAG, these regulatory bodies together hold surplus cash of Rs 60.6 billion as of March 2017.
These funds are generated through fees charged by these bodies, unspent grants received from the government, or budget surpluses, among others. Surplus funds, which get accumulated over a period of time, provide financial flexibility to these autonomous organisations. Typically, these funds are used for capacity building, developing infrastructure, and expansion of the organisation. On many occasions in the past, the Centre has eyed these funds to shore up its resources, only to face resistance from these autonomous regulatory bodies.
“In the past, regulatory bodies, including Sebi, have been reluctant to share their surplus revenue with the government. As the legal provisions around such transfers are not clear, the government requests have got lost in consultations. Recently, after extensive discussion with the regulators, ministries and other parties involved, things seem to be shaping up in a positive manner,” said an official in the Ministry of Finance.
In 2017-18, the Centre has been facing constraints on the fiscal front, with revenues declining due to the implementation of the goods and services tax (GST), the slowdown in the economy, and decline in dividend paid by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) due to demonetisation. Sources said this time around, Sebi has not objected to the government’s proposal on transfer of funds.
The regulator plans to change the accounting guidelines to facilitate the transfer. “Since the new Sebi chairman, Ajay Tyagi, has been part of the finance ministry in his earlier assignment, he understands the government’s intention and challenges,” said the source cited above. An email sent to Sebi remained unanswered.
The issue of retention of surplus funds was first highlighted in 2008 by the CAG. In 2009, the finance ministry proposed to open accounts in the non-interest bearing sections of the public account of India to move these funds. These accounts were finally opened in 2013-14. However, no funds have been deposited in it so far. U K Sinha, former chairman, Sebi, who was against such a transfer during his six-year tenure, said the proposal was an infringement on the regulator’s independence.
“Financial independence is the very basis for regulatory independence. That is why Parliament has approved conscious and categorical provisions for a separate fund while passing the Sebi Act. Advice was received from two different attorneys generals at different point of time, who said the current arrangement is constitutionally valid and correct,” he told Business Standard. Sinha is of the view that the government should convince the CAG and not go after these funds, as the move will affect the independence of regulators in the country.
In July 2017, the Department of Economic Affairs (DEA) had cited the opinion of the attorney general to the government and the CAG on this issue: “Sebi is not obliged to remit from its general fund to the public fund account under Article 266(2) of the Constitution of India. Therefore, it would not be appropriate to deviate from the legislative intent of Parliament as elucidated in Section 14 of Sebi Act, 1992.”
The DEA had added in order to address the issue of accumulation of huge surplus funds, the department was considering to amend the Sebi Act to the effect that surplus funds might be transferred to the consolidated fund of India, as in the case of the RBI.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 01st February 2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI deputy governor cautions fintech platform lenders on privacy concerns during loan recovery

  India's digital lending infrastructure has made the loan sanctioning system online. Yet, loan recovery still needs a “feet on the street” approach, Swaminathan J, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at a media event on Tuesday, September 2, according to news agency ANI.According to the ANI report, the deputy governor flagged that fintech operators in the digital lending segment are giving out loans to customers with poor credit profiles and later using aggressive recovery tactics.“While loan sanctioning and disbursement have become increasingly digital, effective collection and recovery still require a 'feet on the street' and empathetic approach. Many fintech platforms operate on a business model that involves extending small-value loans to customers often with poor credit profiles,” Swaminathan J said.   Fintech platforms' business models The central bank deputy governor highlighted that many fintech platforms' business models involve providing sm

Credit card spending growth declines on RBI gaze, stress build-up

  Credit card spends have further slowed down to 16.6 per cent in the current financial year (FY25), following the Reserve Bank of India’s tightening of unsecured lending norms and rising delinquencies, and increased stress in the portfolio.Typically, during the festival season (September–December), credit card spends peak as several credit card-issuing banks offer discounts and cashbacks on e-commerce and other platforms. This is a reversal of trend in the past three financial years stretching to FY21 due to RBI’s restrictions.In the previous financial year (FY24), credit card spends rose by 27.8 per cent, but were low compared to FY23 which surged by 47.5 per cent. In FY22, the spending increased 54.1 per cent, according to data compiled by Macquarie Research.ICICI Bank recorded 4.4 per cent gross credit losses in its FY24 credit card portfolio as against 3.2 per cent year-on-year. SBI Cards’ credit losses in the segment stood at 7.4 per cent in FY24 and 6.2 per cent in FY23, the rep

India can't rely on wealthy to drive growth: Ex-RBI Dy Guv Viral Acharya

  India can’t rely on wealthy individuals to drive growth and expect the overall economy to improve, Viral Acharya, former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Monday.Acharya, who is the C V Starr Professor of Economics in the Department of Finance at New York University’s Stern School of Business (NYU-Stern), said after the Covid-19 pandemic, rural consumption and investments have weakened.We can’t be pumping our growth through the rich and expect that the economy as a whole will do better,” he said while speaking at an event organised by Elara Capital here.f there has to be a trickle-down, it should have actually happened by now,” Acharya said, adding that when the rich keep getting wealthier and wealthier, they have a savings problem.   “The bank account keeps getting bigger, hence they look for financial assets to invest in. India is closed, so our money can't go outside India that easily. So, it has to chase the limited financial assets in the country and