Skip to main content

PROMOTERS GETA SETTLEMENT PUSH

PROMOTERS GETA SETTLEMENT PUSH
New rule may add to provisioning burden but aid in loan recovery
Promoters of any large account in which the banking sector had an exposure of Rs 20 billion and above were in for trouble if they did not settle their dues soon, said experts. The impact on banks in terms of bad debt numbers and provisioning will remain elevated. estructuring, should be put through a resolution plan if the accounts were in default.
If an account is in default with one bank, other lenders in the consortium will have to try and make the account good. Otherwise, the account could be classified as a stressed asset later, experts said, requiring high provisioning. But more clarification on this would be required, they said.
Bankers said considering most accounts under restructuring have defaulted in the past, the new framework would force these accounts to the resolution path. However, the loans would have to re-rated again.
This could be bad for the promoters because of two reasons. One, if the account is in default, a resolution plan will have to be implemented within 180 days from March 1. If no resolution is found, the account has to be referred to the insolvency court. Second, even if one bank in the consortium objects to the resolution, the account will be subject to insolvency proceedings directly.
In an insolvency proceeding, a promoter cannot bid unless he has cleared his bad debt. This is akin to losing control of the firm.“There is a lot of incentive for banks and promote rs to find are solution before the matter moves to the I BC ,” said Ashish Chhawchharia, partner, restructuring services, Grant Thornton. “If it goes to court, there is no certainty if the promoters will remain in the company, and the hair cut banks will have to take ,” he added.
This will improve recovery by banks, but lenders may have to grapple with rising provisions in the short term. Experts, however, argued that banks had already made provisions for stressed assests.The rules also tighten the screws on some private banks that had delayed the resolution process, bankers said.
Some of these lenders have also raised objections to resolution plans from the joint lenders’ forum, to avoid classifying an account as a nonperforming asset (NPA). Banks had allegedly used the earlier framework extensively to hide their bad debts, instead of opting for resolution. Former RBI governor Raghuram Rajan had termed this asa“per verse incentive ”.

For example, such an account can get at least 18 months if rejigged under strategic debt restructuring (SDR). “A lot of the processes were not functioning well because lenders would either not come for meetings, or those attending the meetings did not have the authority to take decisions,” said Aashit Shah, partner and chair of financial services at corporate law firm J Sagar Associates. “Some lenders would sign up for the restructuring arrangement, some would not. This resulted in a lot of uncertainty,” he added.

New Plan will delay recovery syas india inc

RBI had said companies will get six months from March 1 to get their house in order or go for bankruptcy
Corporate leaders on Tuesday said the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI’s) move to bar all corporate debt-recast programmes and send them to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) after a six-month window is “disruptive” and will impede industrial revival.
“The RBI should first tell us how many of their previous plans, such as S4A, CDR, 5:25 schemes, etc, have worked? If these schemes were a failure, then the RBI should first acknowledge it. Now, what is the guarantee this scheme will help banks or corporate entities?” said a chief executive of a large infrastructure firm, asking not to be named.
“This move is disruptive and will certainly bring down credit growth of banks to the corporate sector, as no company will start a new project,” he added. Late on Monday evening, the RBI scrapped all existing norms and said companies will get six months from March 1 to get their house in order or go for bankruptcy.
“If a scheme is not agreed upon and implemented already, then SDR (strategic debt restructuring) will no longer continue, as all schemes will be dismantled with immediate effect by the RBI,” said a corporate lawyer. This is likely to impact the debt-recast plans of infrastructure, power, telecom, and road companies, he added.
This comes at a time when industrial production moderated to 7.1 per cent on a year-on-year basis in December last year, despite a favourable base effect. The moderation was due to lower growth in manufacturing, infrastructure, and consumer goods. The chairman of a large company said the RBI move would make sure that stalled projects in the power and infrastructure sectors would remain stalled.
He added that the central bank should have taken into account external reasons that led to a company becoming a non-performing asset. Many telecom companies turned defaulters after the Supreme Court cancelled licences granted by the government in 2012.
Similarly, many power companies failed to take off as coal mine allotments were cancelled. “The RBI is slowly shutting off the tap for corporate India. The government has to decide whether it wants investments or not,” he said. Forty companies have already been sent to the NCLT.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 14th February 2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …