Skip to main content

Govt knows how to bite the bullet: FM

Govt knows how to bite the bullet: FM
Jaitley defends ´tax on the wealthiest´
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley on Thursday strongly defended the imposition of the long term capital gains (LTCG) tax on listed stocks, saying the Budget proposal was to tax the wealthiest sections of society,He also said that the Budget, in these challenging times, provided Rs 120 billion relief to the middle class, including pensioners and senior citizens.
Wondering at the analysis over the tax spooking the market, he said the market movement was due to global cues.“Was the tax also responsible for a fall in Dow Jones?” he asked.The FM´s reply to a general debate on the Budget saw heated exchanges in the Lok Sabha between the treasury benches and the Opposition, particularly the Congress, over the Rafale deal.
While Jaitley said the breakup of the deal could not be provided due to security reasons, Congress members said they never demanded segment wise details of the deal.
In his speech in the Lok Sabha, Jaitley said it was the Narendra Modi government that took the difficult decisions of demonetisation, the goods and services tax (GST) and the imposition of the LTCG tax. “We know how to bite the bullet when tough decisions are to be taken,” he said.
He said the previous UPA government did not undertake even a single structural reform.In the Rajya Sabha, where the FM is scheduled to reply to a discussion on Friday, senior Congress leader PChidambaram initiated the debate.Friday is the last day of the first half of the Budget session before it goes into a month long recess to meet again in March.
Initiating the discussion on the Budget in the Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram punched holes in the government´s claim on creation of jobs and promises to increase the minimum support prices and provide health insurance to 500 million people.
Chidambaram,a former FM, complimented Chief Economic Advisor (CEA) Arvind Subramanian for a well researched Economic Survey, but said the NDA government had failed to address the three challenges facing the country, which the Survey had also identified —education and health, unemployment, and agriculture.
The Congress leader, who went hoarse in his effort to be heard over the din of incessant sloganeering by the BJP members during his 40minute speech, termed the government´s economic policya “betrayal”.He said all norms of fiscal prudens had been thrown out the window Chidambaram said it was disappointing that the FM did not heed the CEA´s diagnosis.
The Congress leader said the FM should have said the patient was very ill, may be terminally ill and this was the diagnosis, but he had failed.He said the government was going to leave behind a limping economy.Chidambaram also asked 12 questions on the Budget numbers.On the government´s direct and indirect tax proposals, Chidambaram said the government´s “taxation philosophy was to burden the people with indirect taxes” and benefit the rich.
He described the Budget announcements on MSP for farmers, job creation, and the ambitious health assurance scheme as jumlas, or rhetoric.“We support the triple talaq Bill, but not these triple jumlas,” he said. The former FM asked whether the government would cut the excise duty on petrol and diesel if global crude prices were to rise.
Reiterating that the government loses Rs 3.7 trillion since longterm capital gains are not taxed, Jaitley said only the wealthiest would be taxed since those making capital gains of Rs 100,000 would be exempted.The wealthiest class included large corporates, limited liability partnerships, and foreign institutional investors, he said.
Times were different when the LTCG tax was withdrawn since money in stock markets used to come from Mauritius and Cyprus.Now, India had revised treaties with them, he said, providing rationale for the imposition of the LTCG tax.Jaitley took on the Opposition for saying that the GST was introduced in haste.He reminded them that the Constitution Amendment Bill, passed by Parliament, had made it mandatory for the Centre and the states to introduce the new indirect tax regime by September 1, 2017.

Or else they could not have had the earlier tax system.Asserting that structural reforms such as demonetisation and the GST had thrown up shortterm challenges, but had medium and longterm benefits for the economy, he said India´s gross domestic growth lagged the fastestgrowing economy, China, byacouple of decimal points this year.

“Next two years we will be back as the fastest growing major economy, according to International Monetary Fund estimates,” he said.Unlike the UPA regime, the NDA government had brought down inflation and the Centre´s fiscal deficit, he said. The fiscal deficit slippage by 0.3 percentage points in the current financial year was largely due to the statistical reason of the GST yielding only eight months´ revenue rather than nine months, he added.

Jaitley said while the Congress had imposed 31 per cent indirect taxes (combination of central and state taxes), it was opposing the 28 per cent GST.He defended the different GST rates, saying necessities and luxury goods could not have the same rates.“I went to Singapore and saw that there isa 7 per cent rate on both Mercedes and food items.
India cannot afford that kind of system,” he said.Jaitley said he failed to understand why the Congress was opposing Aadhaar, when it was conceived by the UPA.“You brought the draft law which was silent about the purposes of Aadhaar,” he told the Congress benches.Aadhaar would help the government identify the poor and target subsidies, he said.“I went to Singapore and saw that there isa 7 per cent rate on both Mercedes and food items.India cannot afford that kind of system”
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 09th February 2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...