Skip to main content

Closed end funds lose sheen on LTCG tax

Closed end funds lose sheen on LTCG tax
With the tax disadvantage almost gone, more investors may be willing to venture into international funds to diversify their portfolios
Closedend funds have always been a less attractive investment category than openend ones.The imposition of the longterm capital gains tax (LTCG) of 10 per cent is set to reduce their attractiveness further.Earlier, many retail investors avoided international funds because of their inferior tax treatment visàvis domestic equity funds.
With the tax arbitrage almost gone, most of them can venture into these funds now.In recent times, the number of new closedend funds being launched by fund houses has far exceeded openend funds.When marketing these funds, mutual fund houses highlight two points.One, exiting these funds in the middle of their tenure is difficult.
Though they are listed on the exchanges, these have to be sold atasteep discount.This, fund houses say, deters investors who lack the will power to stay invested in openend funds for the long term from exiting.Two, fund managers can invest the fund´s assets for a longer tenure without worrying about redemption pressure.Closedend funds, however, suffer from a number of disadvantages that they will not tell you about.Investors are subject to timing risk in these funds.They cannot do a systematic investment plan (SIP) as these funds are open for only a limited period.
Investors can, therefore, end up investing a lump sum at high valuations, as is the case now. Investors also have to withdraw their money at a particular time when the fund´s tenure ends.If the markets are down, their returns can be affected.Moreover, since the corpus size of closedend funds tends to be typically lower than that of openend funds, their expense ratio, on average, tends to be higher.
With the introduction of the LTCG tax, one more negative has been added.Says Neil Parag Parikh, chairman and chief executive officer, PPFAS Mutual Fund, “If you area long term investor, say, with a horizon of 810 years, and hold on to your investment in an openend scheme till the time you actually need the money, you will have to pay tax only once.
On the other hand, in a closedend scheme, you will be forced to pay tax on two or three occasions due to the compulsory rollover on account of the scheme´s fixed tenure.” Closedend funds usually have tenures of three, five or seven years.The repeated taxation of the corpus will reduce the compounding benefit.Many investors earlier steered clear of international funds because of their inferior tax treatment.
While equity funds were taxfree after a year, debt funds were taxed onapar with debt funds: at the rate of 20 per cent tax after indexation.The tax arbitrage will almost disappear from the next financial year. The effective tax rate on these funds could, in certain circumstances, be lower than the rate levied on domestic equity funds, depending on the rate of return and inflation (see table).
“Through a bit of tax planning, investors can reduce their tax incidence in these funds even further.By investing towards the end of a financial year, and for slightly more than three years, they can get indexation benefit for four years,” said Deepesh Raghaw, founder, Personal FinancePlan.in,a Sebi registered investment advisor (RIA).Post tax returns from domestic equity funds may continue to exceed the post tax return, from international funds even in the future, despite the LTCG tax.
Nonetheless, experts suggest that investors who wish to reduce their dependence on the home market should diversify into international funds.“Indian investors should enter markets with which the Indian market has a low correlation, says Raghaw.” The US is one such market.Begin witha10 per cent exposure to US funds and raise exposure gradually.

The Business Standard, New Delhi, 20th February 2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI deputy governor cautions fintech platform lenders on privacy concerns during loan recovery

  India's digital lending infrastructure has made the loan sanctioning system online. Yet, loan recovery still needs a “feet on the street” approach, Swaminathan J, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at a media event on Tuesday, September 2, according to news agency ANI.According to the ANI report, the deputy governor flagged that fintech operators in the digital lending segment are giving out loans to customers with poor credit profiles and later using aggressive recovery tactics.“While loan sanctioning and disbursement have become increasingly digital, effective collection and recovery still require a 'feet on the street' and empathetic approach. Many fintech platforms operate on a business model that involves extending small-value loans to customers often with poor credit profiles,” Swaminathan J said.   Fintech platforms' business models The central bank deputy governor highlighted that many fintech platforms' business models involve providing sm

Credit card spending growth declines on RBI gaze, stress build-up

  Credit card spends have further slowed down to 16.6 per cent in the current financial year (FY25), following the Reserve Bank of India’s tightening of unsecured lending norms and rising delinquencies, and increased stress in the portfolio.Typically, during the festival season (September–December), credit card spends peak as several credit card-issuing banks offer discounts and cashbacks on e-commerce and other platforms. This is a reversal of trend in the past three financial years stretching to FY21 due to RBI’s restrictions.In the previous financial year (FY24), credit card spends rose by 27.8 per cent, but were low compared to FY23 which surged by 47.5 per cent. In FY22, the spending increased 54.1 per cent, according to data compiled by Macquarie Research.ICICI Bank recorded 4.4 per cent gross credit losses in its FY24 credit card portfolio as against 3.2 per cent year-on-year. SBI Cards’ credit losses in the segment stood at 7.4 per cent in FY24 and 6.2 per cent in FY23, the rep

India can't rely on wealthy to drive growth: Ex-RBI Dy Guv Viral Acharya

  India can’t rely on wealthy individuals to drive growth and expect the overall economy to improve, Viral Acharya, former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Monday.Acharya, who is the C V Starr Professor of Economics in the Department of Finance at New York University’s Stern School of Business (NYU-Stern), said after the Covid-19 pandemic, rural consumption and investments have weakened.We can’t be pumping our growth through the rich and expect that the economy as a whole will do better,” he said while speaking at an event organised by Elara Capital here.f there has to be a trickle-down, it should have actually happened by now,” Acharya said, adding that when the rich keep getting wealthier and wealthier, they have a savings problem.   “The bank account keeps getting bigger, hence they look for financial assets to invest in. India is closed, so our money can't go outside India that easily. So, it has to chase the limited financial assets in the country and