Skip to main content

Closed end funds lose sheen on LTCG tax

Closed end funds lose sheen on LTCG tax
With the tax disadvantage almost gone, more investors may be willing to venture into international funds to diversify their portfolios
Closedend funds have always been a less attractive investment category than openend ones.The imposition of the longterm capital gains tax (LTCG) of 10 per cent is set to reduce their attractiveness further.Earlier, many retail investors avoided international funds because of their inferior tax treatment visàvis domestic equity funds.
With the tax arbitrage almost gone, most of them can venture into these funds now.In recent times, the number of new closedend funds being launched by fund houses has far exceeded openend funds.When marketing these funds, mutual fund houses highlight two points.One, exiting these funds in the middle of their tenure is difficult.
Though they are listed on the exchanges, these have to be sold atasteep discount.This, fund houses say, deters investors who lack the will power to stay invested in openend funds for the long term from exiting.Two, fund managers can invest the fund´s assets for a longer tenure without worrying about redemption pressure.Closedend funds, however, suffer from a number of disadvantages that they will not tell you about.Investors are subject to timing risk in these funds.They cannot do a systematic investment plan (SIP) as these funds are open for only a limited period.
Investors can, therefore, end up investing a lump sum at high valuations, as is the case now. Investors also have to withdraw their money at a particular time when the fund´s tenure ends.If the markets are down, their returns can be affected.Moreover, since the corpus size of closedend funds tends to be typically lower than that of openend funds, their expense ratio, on average, tends to be higher.
With the introduction of the LTCG tax, one more negative has been added.Says Neil Parag Parikh, chairman and chief executive officer, PPFAS Mutual Fund, “If you area long term investor, say, with a horizon of 810 years, and hold on to your investment in an openend scheme till the time you actually need the money, you will have to pay tax only once.
On the other hand, in a closedend scheme, you will be forced to pay tax on two or three occasions due to the compulsory rollover on account of the scheme´s fixed tenure.” Closedend funds usually have tenures of three, five or seven years.The repeated taxation of the corpus will reduce the compounding benefit.Many investors earlier steered clear of international funds because of their inferior tax treatment.
While equity funds were taxfree after a year, debt funds were taxed onapar with debt funds: at the rate of 20 per cent tax after indexation.The tax arbitrage will almost disappear from the next financial year. The effective tax rate on these funds could, in certain circumstances, be lower than the rate levied on domestic equity funds, depending on the rate of return and inflation (see table).
“Through a bit of tax planning, investors can reduce their tax incidence in these funds even further.By investing towards the end of a financial year, and for slightly more than three years, they can get indexation benefit for four years,” said Deepesh Raghaw, founder, Personal FinancePlan.in,a Sebi registered investment advisor (RIA).Post tax returns from domestic equity funds may continue to exceed the post tax return, from international funds even in the future, despite the LTCG tax.
Nonetheless, experts suggest that investors who wish to reduce their dependence on the home market should diversify into international funds.“Indian investors should enter markets with which the Indian market has a low correlation, says Raghaw.” The US is one such market.Begin witha10 per cent exposure to US funds and raise exposure gradually.

The Business Standard, New Delhi, 20th February 2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...