Skip to main content

Bank haircuts on NPAs go up to 80%

Bank haircuts on NPAs go up to 80%
Nine of the 12 firms on RBI list enter bidding stage
As nine of the 12 companies on the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI’s) first list of non-performing assets (NPAs) enter the bidding stage, the average haircut on bad loans, or loss to banks based on the offers made by suitors in five cases, ranges between 50 per cent and 80 per cent.
The least loss is likely to be in the case of Bhushan Steel, for which JSW Steel has offered Rs 280 billion of cash and equity worth Rs 17 billion to banks. Bhushan Steel owes banks Rs 560 billion.The steepest haircut, however, is due to Jyoti Structures, which has got just one bid, from a clutch of high net worth individuals (HNIs)
So far, the insolvency process has resulted in a mixed bag for the banks, with some of the cases going through a rebid and revision in offers. Alok Industries is going through a rebid, and Amtek Auto through a revision in offers. Liberty House has submitted a revised offer for the company. Earlier, lenders had rejected the offers made by Liberty House and Deccan Value Investors because they were below the liquidation value. A Liberty House spokesperson said the company had shown an interest and submitted a revised offer.
In some of the cases, there could be some upside in offers. For instance, for Electrosteel Steels, Vedanta has submitted an offer of Rs 45 billion, but Tata Steel has also written to the committee of creditors on revising its offer. In the case of Monnet, JSW has upped its offer from the earlier Rs 24 billion to Rs 27 billion
Bhushan Steel and Bhushan Power & Steel just invited bids. In both the assets, JSW Steel is pitted against Tata Steel. It will have to be seen whether the highest offer will be matched or whether the offer is upped after negotiations. On Monday, bids will be invited for Essar Steel.
Banking industry sources said it was the private sector banks that were ready to negotiate fast and sell assets at even 50-60 per cent of the debt but the public sector banks were resisting settlements due to fear of persecution later. Public sector banks want companies to undergo liquidation under the National Companies Law Tribunal rather than any settlements. But there are cases like Lanco Infratech in which lenders are apprehensive. Four lesser-known companies have submitted bids.
Even besides the 12 companies identified by the RBI for resolution, banks have sold assets at a higher haircut.For example, in the case of cement firm Murli Industries, banks have liquidated the company to Dalmia Cement at a haircut of 79 per cent. The company had to be liquidated at marginally above its liquidation value as the plant was shut for a few months. But in the case of Binani Cement, the asset is being sold at a price higher than its debt because the bidders say the company can be turned around easily.
JSW Cement had made the highest offer for Binani Cement but banks have asked for rebids because bidders such as Rakesh Jhunjhunwala have offered to better JSW Cement’s bid.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 12th February 2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector Dealers with turnover of Rs 2 crore and above covered; industry says threshold too low The central government has notified the money laundering rules for the gems and jewellery sector with immediate effect. Now, any entity deals in precious metals, precious stones, or other high-value goods and has a turnover of Rs 2 crore or more in a financial year will be covered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, 2002). The limit of Rs 2 crore would be calculated on the basis of the previous year’s turnover, said the notification. The directorate general of goods and service tax intelligence has been appointed under the Act. Sources said the government’s move to apply the PMLA to the jewellery sector was a fallout of income-tax raids on jewellers soon after demonetisation last November, when it was found that they sold gold and jewellery at a huge premium and accepted old currency notes as payment. The notification, issued on Augus…

Confusion over branded food GST

Confusion over branded food GST The GST Council's statement over the weekend on applying tax on branded food items has left most of the trade confused.

Even though the Council has not changed the rates on food -0 per cent on unbranded stuff and 5 per cent on brands -many small traders who didn't levy GST earlier said they could come under the 5 per cent slab after the clarification.

While they predicted some increase in consumer prices, large players said they can absorb GST in many ways and keep prices steady.

"Trade is confused and hence on behalf of our chamber, we have asked our members to go ahead and charge 5 per cent GST," said Sushil Sureka, general secretary of the Ahilya Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Indore.

The statement clarifying the application of GST came after some businesses were found deregistering their brands and selling under corporate brand name without paying tax, after the Council exempted unbranded food from the new all-encompassing indirec…