Skip to main content

Tax uncertainty over insolvency deals likely to go

Tax uncertainty over insolvency deals likely to go
The government may consider resolving two of the biggest tax roadblocks looming over a successful conclusion of the insolvency process in the upcoming Budget, two people close to the development said.
The government may allow carrying forward of losses for eight years for buyers of companies in the insolvency process. This is not allowed under the current tax laws and buyers have been asking for such a relief.
it may also address industry fears of the income tax department challenging the valuations after the conclusion of deals. "The government allowed carrying forward of losses for eight years for the startups last year. Similar exception is being considered for deals happening in insolvency," a person close to the development said.
Industry trackers said the tax outgo could be higher if the buyer of an insolvent company is unable to set off losses or carry it forward on the balance sheet.
"Section 79 of the I-T Act specifically states that losses cannot be carried forward if majority shareholding changes hands. The government had given a leeway to startups from this section and the same could also be done for companies under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, otherwise, it may lead be huge tax liability," said Paras Savla, partner, KPB & Associates.
Ambiguities about MAT
Take, for example, the case of an insolvent company with a loss of about Rs 8,000 crore that has changed hands. Under current regulations, this loss cannot be carried forward and will be set off in one financial year. Now, if this company incurs a profit of Rs 800 crore in the next year, it will be liable to pay a 30% tax.
If carrying forward of losses is allowed even in cases where majority shareholding has changed hands, the company can carry forward the loss of Rs 8,000 crore and could save on income tax of 30%.
"We have made representations to the government to give leeway to carry forward losses for the new buyer even in situations where a majority shareholding has changed hands. Also, the risk of tax officials levying minimum alternate tax (MAT) continues to hover over insolvency deals and an additional clarification is required," said Abizer Diwanji, partner and national leader-Financial Services, EY.
ET was the first to report on August 29 about the MAT issue in insolvency cases.The problem, say industry trackers, is that the purchase of a distressed asset triggers writedowns in the profit and loss (P&L) accounts of companies, resulting in likely book profits. Existing laws require that MAT be paid on book profits.
While the government has come out with clarification, industry experts say the tax authorities could still trigger MAT as some ambiguity around treatment of the said buyouts remain.
Many potential buyers of insolvent companies also fear that the tax authorities could also challenge valuations in such deals. Under the newly introduced sections like 50CA, revenue authorities can slap tax of up to 30% in cases where they feel that the buyer has paid less for an asset. So if a company buys another insolvent company for Rs 10,000 crore, tax authorities can challenge the valuation.
If tax authorities feel the value of the company should be Rs 20,000 crore, a 30% tax can be levied on Rs 10,000 crore.
Fair value formula
Tax experts point out that the revenue authorities' formula to arrive at the fair value may not be consistent with commercial realities."The impact is quite severe in case of transactions of shares under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), as the deal price could be much lower as compared to the quoted price of the shares," said Punit Shah, partner, Dhruva Advisors.
According to another person close to the development, the government is looking to exempt insolvency deals from such scrutiny. The fear is valuations of insolvency deals could be challenged by tax department in future.
This fear is amplified as tax department has started scrutinising valuation of all M&A deals where transfer of shares, second round of funding, or fresh fund infusion, has taken place.ET on January 27 reported that the income tax scrutiny is being carried out to identify deals where transactions have happened at a price which is either substantially less than or much higher than the fair market value.
The Economic Times, New Delhi, 30th January 2018


Popular posts from this blog

April GST collections at new high despite rate rationalisation in December

Goods and services tax (GST) collection touched a record high in April, exceeding Rs 1 trillion for the third time in four months. The mop-up was 10 per cent higher over the previous year. Gross collection for the month was Rs 1.13 trillion, said the finance ministry. Despite the recent rate rationalisation in December, a rise in collection was reported. Of the total collected, the CGST (central GST) contributed Rs 21,163 crore, the SGST (state GST) Rs 28,801 crore, the IGST (integrated GST) Rs 54,733 crore (including Rs 23,289 crore on import) and cess Rs 9,168 crore (including Rs 1,053 crore on import). After settlement of the IGST and the balance IGST in a 50:50 ratio between the Centre and states on a provisional basis, the CGST stood at Rs 47,533 crore and SGST at Rs 50,776 crore. The CGST target in the Union Budget for 2019-20 is Rs 6.1 trillion. “The April collection indicates the tax base is increasing gradually, with GST getting stabilised with measures such as e-way bills and…

Defaults are Costly: Bankruptcy Law Gives Lenders More Teeth

Lenders can bargain strongly on asset recovery, defaulting borrowers can lose control of co With the Bankruptcy Act in place, banks can breathe easy, at least in the medium term, as corporate borrowers will now intensify their efforts to avoid loan defaults and the likely loss of management control of business, said Moody's Investors Service. This will empower lenders to bargain strongly in matters of asset recovery, while borrowers can gain with lower borrowing costs after three-four quarters. “The (defaulting) borrowers will lose control of the company as soon as the process is initiated,“ Srikanth Vadlamani, vicepresident, Financial Institutions Group, Moody's Investors Service, told ET from Singapore.“This, in itself, should act as a key incentive for them not to default in the first place.“ A few weeks ago, the government passed the Bankruptcy Bill, introducing a time-bound settlement process against loan default. With the Bankruptcy Act, the resolution process-from the date …

SC order on RBI circular: More options for banks to tackle defaulting firms

Lenders also have the option of restructuring the loans Lenders to companies which are under stress could now have three options to deal with them if they default on loans: take a haircut as part of a one-time settlement, restructure the loans for a longer tenure as they did when corporate debt restructuring schemes were allowed, or go to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) for redress. These changes in the options available to lenders come, according to PE funds and bank lawyers who are involved in the IBC process, in the wake of the Supreme Court on Tuesday setting aside the 12 February RBI circular, which allowed a 180-day window to banks to resolve a company default.But they can still find a resolution. According to a Reserve Bank of India circular, a loan becomes a non-performing asset when banks cannot find a way of recovering their money in 90 days. In short, banks still have a window to resolve the default. Lenders can take a haircut as part of a one -time settlement of du…