Skip to main content

Officials back Dholakia´s objection to RBI´s growth assessment

Officials back Dholakia´s objection to RBI´s growth assessment
As Advance Estimates by the statistics office for growth in gross value added (GV) came much below the Reserve Bank of India´s (RBI) projections for 201718, officials in the Central Statistics Office (CSO) point to an assessment by a Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) member who said the central bank had overestimated the numbers, ahead of the December policy review.
Another official in the finance ministry said the assessment by the member,RDholakia, was correct so far as the issue of cut in the policy rate was concerned.According to minutes of the MPC meeting in December, Dholakia said RBI overestimated growth.
While the CSO puts GVA growth at 6.1 per cent, RBI had projected 6.7 per cent.Dholakia,a professor of economics at IIMAhmedabad, had pitched for a 25 basis points (bps) rate reduction in the December meeting.
He had also predicted the fiscal deficit might exceed the target of 3.2 per cent of Gross Domestic Product this year, with nominal growth to grow slower than expected.
Inflation remains under reasonable control, he had argued.However, RBI had retained the policy rate at the same level.Senior officials in the government say Dholakia is the only one to have correctly gauged the economic situation and that policy rate cuts are required to spur the economic growth engine.
“RBI growth estimates seem an overestimate.Only Dholakia´s assessment in the MPC is on the mark.There should have been a rate cut and there needs to be a rate cut,” said a senior official.This brings back the divide between government and RBI over rates.
Chief economic adviser Arvind Subramanian had in the second volume of the Economic Survey for 201718 said RBI got its inflation projection wrong by more than 100 bps for six of the past 14 quarters.
“I am not in agreement with the assessment of RBI for both the CPI (consumer price index) inflation and economic growth prospects in the near term.The real cause of concern right now is economic recovery and its slow pace.
Fiscal space is more or less exhausted but the space for monetary boost has fortunately been available now for a relatively long period.” Dholakia had said, according to the minutes of the MPC meeting.
In the August 2 meeting, when the policy rate was reduced by 25 bps, Dholakia had pitched fora50 bps reduction.The government breached the fiscal deficit target given in the Budget for 201718 by November itself at 112 per cent of its Rs 5.5 trillion target, the highest deviation in the first eight months ofafinancial year since 2008-09, year of the global financial crisis.

The Centre also announced it would additionally borrow Rs 500 billion from the market.Dholakia had said in the meeting that the fiscal deficit as percentage of GDP might exceed the target because nominal GDP would grow much slower than the assumed number (11.75 per cent) in the Budget on account of lower inflation and substantial slowing in real growth.

The CSO has estimated nominal GDP growth at 9.5 per cent for FY18.Everything remaining constant, the fiscal deficit will go up to 3.3 per cent of GDP on account of nominal GDP slowdown.“The expectation of growth recovery by RBI during the JuneSeptember quarter turned out to beasubstantial overstatement,” Dholakia had said in the meeting.
As against RBI´s expectation of 6.4 per cent, the growth of real GVA during the quarter turned out to be 6.1 per cent.
“Yet, RBI has not revised its growth forecast from the earlier 6.7 per cent for 201718. This implies RBI now expects higher growth of 7 and 7.8 per cent, respectively, in the third and fourth quarters of 201718. This is highly improbable without any policy rate cut because fiscal space is practically nonexistent,” he had further said.
Senior officials in the govt say Dholakia is the only one to have correctly gauged the economic situation and that policy rate cuts are required to spur the economic growth engine


The Business Standard, New Delhi, 12th January 2018
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector Dealers with turnover of Rs 2 crore and above covered; industry says threshold too low The central government has notified the money laundering rules for the gems and jewellery sector with immediate effect. Now, any entity deals in precious metals, precious stones, or other high-value goods and has a turnover of Rs 2 crore or more in a financial year will be covered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, 2002). The limit of Rs 2 crore would be calculated on the basis of the previous year’s turnover, said the notification. The directorate general of goods and service tax intelligence has been appointed under the Act. Sources said the government’s move to apply the PMLA to the jewellery sector was a fallout of income-tax raids on jewellers soon after demonetisation last November, when it was found that they sold gold and jewellery at a huge premium and accepted old currency notes as payment. The notification, issued on Augus…

Confusion over branded food GST

Confusion over branded food GST The GST Council's statement over the weekend on applying tax on branded food items has left most of the trade confused.

Even though the Council has not changed the rates on food -0 per cent on unbranded stuff and 5 per cent on brands -many small traders who didn't levy GST earlier said they could come under the 5 per cent slab after the clarification.

While they predicted some increase in consumer prices, large players said they can absorb GST in many ways and keep prices steady.

"Trade is confused and hence on behalf of our chamber, we have asked our members to go ahead and charge 5 per cent GST," said Sushil Sureka, general secretary of the Ahilya Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Indore.

The statement clarifying the application of GST came after some businesses were found deregistering their brands and selling under corporate brand name without paying tax, after the Council exempted unbranded food from the new all-encompassing indirec…