Skip to main content

Insolvency professionals divided over ban on resolution outsourcing

Insolvency professionals divided over ban on resolution outsourcing
The insolvency regulator’s move to ban outsourcing of resolution work is primarily targeted at insolvency professional entities (IPEs), some experts said. However, others said this step by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) would affect individual resolution professionals (RPs) as well.
It is aimed at ensuring that only RPs chair the committee of creditors meeting. Otherwise, the worry was that someone from resolution entities and not an RP would conduct these. In its circular, IBBI had said resolution services cannot be outsourced by insolvency professionals. Sources say it had found that heads of IPEs were chairing the committee of creditors meetings. Insolvency professionals who had taken up the project of reviving the company concerned are supposed to do so.
umant Batra, managing partner at Kesar Dass B and Associates, says, “The outsourcing part of the circular might be targeted at those insolvency professional entities who take up projects in the name of one resolution plan but all the functions of the resolution plans are practically performed by another person in the entity."
He thinks the circular will not affect hiring of consultants and legal advisors to assist in insolvency resolution. IBBI’s circular is not likely to affect the big 12 cases referred by banks on Reserve Bank of India order for insolvency, say experts, as IPEs are not involved in those cases
On the negative side, insolvency professionals state this would make it difficult for them to hire auditors. Nilesh Sharma, senior partner with Dhir and Dhir Associates, says this would bring down the number of professionals in big cases where payment to the insolvency professional is huge as there are many people involved, as compared to smaller cases.
An insolvency professional is required to manage the operations of a defaulting corporate as a going concern. He or she is also required to invite resolution plans, examine these and present to the committee of creditors for its approval.
The regulator has also issued orders for insolvency professionals to use only their official address for correspondence. The circular said, “It has been observed that a few insolvency professionals are using different addresses and emails while communicating with the stakeholders, despite repeated advice from IBBI to use the addressees and e-mails registered with the IBBI in all their communications."
This has irked insolvency professionals. They feel the regulator is getting into micro management. One of them told Business Standard, “There could be technical difficulties for an insolvency professional to use a particular e-mail account. Because of this, he might choose to use another account which also ensures privacy."
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 09th January 2018


Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Firms with sales below Rs.50 crore out of ambit

The tax department has reiterated that the PoEM rules, which require foreign firms to pay taxes in India if the effective control is here, will not apply to companies withaturnover of Rs.50 crore or less inafinancial year. Last month, the tax department had come out with the longawaited Place of Effective Management (PoEM) rules, which require foreign companies in India and Indian firms with overseas subsidiaries to pay local taxes if their businesses are effectively controlled by Indians. Then the rules did not setathreshold above which they were to apply. However, the accompanying press release states that the rules will not apply to companies withaturnover of up to Rs.50 crore inayear. That created confusion whether the threshold will be adhered to. Inacircular to clarify things, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) said the provision "shall not apply toacompany havingaturnover or gross receipts of ~50 crore or less inafinancial year".

PoEM rules essentially target shell …