Skip to main content

Higher direct tax mop up gives govt fiscal relief

Higher direct tax mop up gives govt fiscal relief
A mid fiscal worries, the government has got some relief on the direct taxes front, primarily due to lower refunds.Direct tax collection rose 18.2 per cent till December last year.The target of direct tax collection growth was 15.7 per cent for this financial year, according to Budget Estimates.
The collection (after refunds) rose to Rs 6.56 trillion till December.This represented 67 per cent of the Budget Estimates of Rs 9.8 trillion.The refunds stood at Rs 1.12 trillion, 23 per cent lower than last year´s Rs 1.38 trillion.
The increase would give some leeway to the government, which faces the challenge of reining in its fiscal deficit at 3.2 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) due to subdued goods and services tax (GST) collection, transfer of surplus by the Reserve Bank of India and telecom spectrum receipts.The government is looking atashortfall of about Rs 500 billion from these heads.
The 23 per cent drop in refunds was the reason gross direct tax collection (before refunds) growth was much lower at 12.6 per cent in the first nine months of the current financial year, against 18.2 per cent net collections a year ago. The collection had increased to Rs 7.68 trillion during AprilDecember 2017.
Neeru Ahuja, partner, Deloitte Haskins and Sells, said lower refunds could be on account of a reduction in regular assessments by the direct tax department.
“Regular audits and assessment have come down.The department now and picking up cases where there are issues.In transfer pricing, in particular, the assessments have seenasubstantial reduction.” Vikas Vasal, partner, Grant Thornton, said a reduction in refunds was on account on two major factors —pending refunds being cleared last year and litigation going down.
“In transfer pricing, the government has eased out many things.At the consulting level we feel that the number of cases has gone down as the government has increased thresholds and issued enough clarifications.
Besides, there is a more pragmatic approach in picking up cases for litigation by the department.” The fiscal deficit target also faced pressure due to lower growth in gross domestic product than estimated in the Budget.
The First Advance Estimates for GDP growth in 201718, released on Friday, indicated the fiscal deficit as a percentage of nominal GDP would come in at nearly 3.3 per cent, as opposed to the target of 3.2 per cent, even if the deficit was retained at the budgeted Rs 5.46 trillion.
Data released by the Central Statistics Office showed that GDP at current prices was expected to grow to Rs 166 trillion from a provisional estimate of Rs 152 trillion in 201617.The government had by November run up the fiscal deficit at 112 per cent of the target set out in the Budget for 201718.
This was the highest deviation from Budget Estimates in the first eight months of a fiscal year since 200809, the year of the global financial crisis.About Rs 3.18 trillion has been received as advance tax up to December 2017, reflecting a growth of 12.7 per cent over collection in the corresponding period of the previous year. Growth in corporation advance tax was 10.9 per cent and that in personal income tax was 21.6 per cent.

The Business Standard, New Delhi, 10th January 2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …