Skip to main content

Govt to classify shell firms by month-end

Govt to classify shell firms by month-end
The government will come up with a proper definition of what a shell company is by the end of this month.
According to sources, the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) had in February last year constituted a special task force to tackle malpractices by shell companies. The task force will lay down specific guidelines to validate the clampdown on shell companies. The definition of shell firms is expected to be inserted in the Companies Act, securities laws, and also in the Income-Tax (I-T) Act, wherever applicable.
The Centre is working on recommendations from multiple enforcement agencies and regulatory bodies, sources said. “We have received a lot of suggestions in this regard as there is no law that defines the subject and related parameters,” said an official privy to the development.
According to the official, the special task force had directed all enforcement agencies concerned, including the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Enforcement Directorate and Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), to provide inputs on the functioning of shell companies
“The government is of the view that a fair number of shell companies exists for legitimate purposes,and wants to distinguish such a company from those that are being created for the purpose of tax evasion, siphoning of public money, dubious transfer pricing, manipulation of share prices or money laundering,” said the official.
Another source said the task force had observed that there were instances where dummy firms or penny stocks were often being misunderstood as shell companies. “Such lack of clarity has halted investigations in various actionable cases,” the source said.
“According to the concept adopted, shell companies are inactive. They do not have an operating income. They are incorporated to hold shares and investments, hence, are static in terms of valuation. However, the definition needs clarity so that one can justify while classifying them into shell firms,” said Sandeep Parekh, founder, Finsec Law Advisors.
Experts also believe that any action on these firms should be based on facts .“A proper definition and concept having backing in law is needed to crack down on such companies, as it will be codified as a concept. Even if the definition is provided in law, it should be an inclusive definition depending on the facts and circumstances,” said Lalit Kumar, partner, J Sagar Associates.
The move follows the government’s in ability to clamp down on shell firms even after the ministry of corporate affairs (MCA) disqualified directors and put out a list of 55,000 companies as “defaulters”.Some of these companies were not shell companies according to the previous concept. Moreover, 224,000 companies were struck off for remaining inactive for two years or more.
Market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India had also suspended trading in 331-suspected shell firms, a list of which was issued by the MCA on August 7.However, these actions did not go down well with those affected, and some firms approached various courts and judicial bodies like the Securities Appellate Tribunal. They obtained stays on the directives in the absence of strict parameters classifying them as shell firms.
The judicial bodies observed that the orders against the companies had been passed without proper investigations, and that they were not given enough opportunity to be heard.

The Business Standard, New Delhi, 2nd January 2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …