Skip to main content

Govt to classify shell firms by month-end

Govt to classify shell firms by month-end
The government will come up with a proper definition of what a shell company is by the end of this month.
According to sources, the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) had in February last year constituted a special task force to tackle malpractices by shell companies. The task force will lay down specific guidelines to validate the clampdown on shell companies. The definition of shell firms is expected to be inserted in the Companies Act, securities laws, and also in the Income-Tax (I-T) Act, wherever applicable.
The Centre is working on recommendations from multiple enforcement agencies and regulatory bodies, sources said. “We have received a lot of suggestions in this regard as there is no law that defines the subject and related parameters,” said an official privy to the development.
According to the official, the special task force had directed all enforcement agencies concerned, including the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Enforcement Directorate and Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), to provide inputs on the functioning of shell companies
“The government is of the view that a fair number of shell companies exists for legitimate purposes,and wants to distinguish such a company from those that are being created for the purpose of tax evasion, siphoning of public money, dubious transfer pricing, manipulation of share prices or money laundering,” said the official.
Another source said the task force had observed that there were instances where dummy firms or penny stocks were often being misunderstood as shell companies. “Such lack of clarity has halted investigations in various actionable cases,” the source said.
“According to the concept adopted, shell companies are inactive. They do not have an operating income. They are incorporated to hold shares and investments, hence, are static in terms of valuation. However, the definition needs clarity so that one can justify while classifying them into shell firms,” said Sandeep Parekh, founder, Finsec Law Advisors.
Experts also believe that any action on these firms should be based on facts .“A proper definition and concept having backing in law is needed to crack down on such companies, as it will be codified as a concept. Even if the definition is provided in law, it should be an inclusive definition depending on the facts and circumstances,” said Lalit Kumar, partner, J Sagar Associates.
The move follows the government’s in ability to clamp down on shell firms even after the ministry of corporate affairs (MCA) disqualified directors and put out a list of 55,000 companies as “defaulters”.Some of these companies were not shell companies according to the previous concept. Moreover, 224,000 companies were struck off for remaining inactive for two years or more.
Market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India had also suspended trading in 331-suspected shell firms, a list of which was issued by the MCA on August 7.However, these actions did not go down well with those affected, and some firms approached various courts and judicial bodies like the Securities Appellate Tribunal. They obtained stays on the directives in the absence of strict parameters classifying them as shell firms.
The judicial bodies observed that the orders against the companies had been passed without proper investigations, and that they were not given enough opportunity to be heard.

The Business Standard, New Delhi, 2nd January 2018


Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Firms with sales below Rs.50 crore out of ambit

The tax department has reiterated that the PoEM rules, which require foreign firms to pay taxes in India if the effective control is here, will not apply to companies withaturnover of Rs.50 crore or less inafinancial year. Last month, the tax department had come out with the longawaited Place of Effective Management (PoEM) rules, which require foreign companies in India and Indian firms with overseas subsidiaries to pay local taxes if their businesses are effectively controlled by Indians. Then the rules did not setathreshold above which they were to apply. However, the accompanying press release states that the rules will not apply to companies withaturnover of up to Rs.50 crore inayear. That created confusion whether the threshold will be adhered to. Inacircular to clarify things, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) said the provision "shall not apply toacompany havingaturnover or gross receipts of ~50 crore or less inafinancial year".

PoEM rules essentially target shell …