Skip to main content

Commerce Ministry panel's proposal to end MAT on SEZs under review

By
Commerce Ministry panel's proposal to end MAT on SEZs under review
The minimum alternate tax levied on special economic zones (SEZs) that hit fresh investments in the scheme is under review. A panel appointed by the commerce department had recommended removal of MAT for manufacturing units and zones to boost exports as well as job creation in the country.
"The recommendations of the report are being examined," said a government official, who did not wish to be identified. A final call on the proposal will be taken in the budget keeping in view revenue implications and benefit that may accrue to the country in terms of manufacturing boost and jobs, the official said. Finance minister Arun Jaitley will present his fifth budget and the last full one of this NDA government on February 1. ET had earlier reported on the recommendations of the panel set up to review the SEZ norms.
Tax experts said removal of MAT would boost business sentiment. "Ideally, MAT should not be levied on SEZ units, as it's against the very concept of providing tax concession to the industry to promote investment and exports from India," said Vikas Vasal, partner, Grant Thornton India LLP.
The SEZ policy was unveiled by the NDA government in 2000. In 2016-17, the revenue loss to the government on account of concessions to SEZs was Rs 10,182 crore. There will be a bigger loss of revenue if MAT is withdrawn.
MAT was introduced to bring into the tax net "zero tax companies" which in spite of having earned substantial book profits and having paid big dividends, do not pay any tax due to various tax concessions and incentives provided under the income tax law. MAT is levied at the rate of 18.5% plus surcharge and cess as applicable on book profit
The erstwhile United Progressive Alliance government had brought in the SEZ Act in 2005 that provided for exemption from income tax for 15 years for these zones as well as units the located in these zones. There was no sunset date for this exemption.
The government then amended the income tax law in 2012 to impose MAT on SEZs at rate of 18.5%. The Narendra Modi-led NDA government introduced sunset date for SEZs in 2016, but did not withdraw MAT despite hectic lobbying by industry and representation by the commerce department due to revenue considerations. Sunset date was introduced in line with the government's big plan to phase out exemptions and reduce corporate tax rate to 25%. According to the sunset clause, only an SEZ unit that commences operations on or before March 31, 2020, shall be eligible for income tax holiday.
Lower MAT Across Board
Tax laws must be rational for all, and not just special enclaves. MAT is supposed to discourage companies from arranging their tax affairs in a way that would lead to huge profits, dividend payout and no tax liability due to depreciation and other incentives. MAT can be scrapped when exemptions are removed while lowering rates so that taxable profits can be aligned with book profits. Lowering the MAT rate makes sense, uniformly across
The Econmonic Times, New Delhi, 15th January 2018

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RBI deputy governor cautions fintech platform lenders on privacy concerns during loan recovery

By
  India's digital lending infrastructure has made the loan sanctioning system online. Yet, loan recovery still needs a “feet on the street” approach, Swaminathan J, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at a media event on Tuesday, September 2, according to news agency ANI.According to the ANI report, the deputy governor flagged that fintech operators in the digital lending segment are giving out loans to customers with poor credit profiles and later using aggressive recovery tactics.“While loan sanctioning and disbursement have become increasingly digital, effective collection and recovery still require a 'feet on the street' and empathetic approach. Many fintech platforms operate on a business model that involves extending small-value loans to customers often with poor credit profiles,” Swaminathan J said.   Fintech platforms' business models The central bank deputy governor highlighted that many fintech platforms' business models involve providing sm
Post a Comment
Read more

Credit card spending growth declines on RBI gaze, stress build-up

By
  Credit card spends have further slowed down to 16.6 per cent in the current financial year (FY25), following the Reserve Bank of India’s tightening of unsecured lending norms and rising delinquencies, and increased stress in the portfolio.Typically, during the festival season (September–December), credit card spends peak as several credit card-issuing banks offer discounts and cashbacks on e-commerce and other platforms. This is a reversal of trend in the past three financial years stretching to FY21 due to RBI’s restrictions.In the previous financial year (FY24), credit card spends rose by 27.8 per cent, but were low compared to FY23 which surged by 47.5 per cent. In FY22, the spending increased 54.1 per cent, according to data compiled by Macquarie Research.ICICI Bank recorded 4.4 per cent gross credit losses in its FY24 credit card portfolio as against 3.2 per cent year-on-year. SBI Cards’ credit losses in the segment stood at 7.4 per cent in FY24 and 6.2 per cent in FY23, the rep
Post a Comment
Read more

India can't rely on wealthy to drive growth: Ex-RBI Dy Guv Viral Acharya

By
  India can’t rely on wealthy individuals to drive growth and expect the overall economy to improve, Viral Acharya, former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Monday.Acharya, who is the C V Starr Professor of Economics in the Department of Finance at New York University’s Stern School of Business (NYU-Stern), said after the Covid-19 pandemic, rural consumption and investments have weakened.We can’t be pumping our growth through the rich and expect that the economy as a whole will do better,” he said while speaking at an event organised by Elara Capital here.f there has to be a trickle-down, it should have actually happened by now,” Acharya said, adding that when the rich keep getting wealthier and wealthier, they have a savings problem.   “The bank account keeps getting bigger, hence they look for financial assets to invest in. India is closed, so our money can't go outside India that easily. So, it has to chase the limited financial assets in the country and
Post a Comment
Read more