Skip to main content

Budget may tweak tax norms for listed stocks

Budget may tweak tax norms for  listed stocks
Short-term capital gains tax on equities may be extended to three years
The finance ministry is considering extending the holding period for shortterm capital gains (STCG) tax on listed securities from one year to three years, bringing equities onapar with some other asset classes in tax treatment.
This is among a number of measures for the capital markets that may be announced in the Union Budget for 201819.The STCG tax on stocks and mutual funds is 15 per cent at present.Listed securities held above a year do not attract any tax. The longterm capital gains (LTCG) tax on this asset class was removed in 2005, making India one of the most liberal stock market regimes.
The STCG tax on other asset classes such as bonds, gold, and real estate is applied when the holding period is less than three years.There have been demands from a section of stakeholders that the LTCG tax on equities be reimposed.
Budgetmakers, however, are of the view such a move may spook institutional investors and extending the tenure of the STCG tax could be a better option.There have also been representations to the government to do away with the securities transaction tax (STT) and to provide clarity on the goods and service tax (GST) on alternative investment funds and passthrough status for certain categories of such funds.
In preBudget meetings with Finance Minister Arun Jaitley and in offrecord meetings with the ministry, companies, consultancy firms, and market participants have given positive feedback on extending the holding period for STCG tax.

Expected Measures
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley could extension of shortterm capital gains on stocks to three years
BSE says that revenue loss from capital gains (LTCG) exemption leads revenue loss of Rs 500 billion
At present, STCG on equities and mutual funds is 15%. LTCG after 1 |STCG on gold, real estate, and debt mutual funds is applied if the holding tenure is less than 3 years.
The gains are added to investor´s income and taxed, according to income tax slab
LTCG on gold, real estate, and debt mutual funds is 20.6% (with inflation indexation benefit)
The BSE had earlier told the ministry revenue forgone on the LTCG tax exemption on listed securities could be Rs 500 billion per annum.
“Instead of reimposing the LTCG tax, the government is considering extending the STCG tax for listed securities held till three years, up from one year currently.That will bring equities onapar with other asset classes,” said a source familiar with the developments.
If the move is decided upon, Jaitley may make this announcement in the Budget.“The government seems to be keen on doing away with exemptions and bringing down the tax rate. Extension of the STCG tax on equities to three years seems feasible,” said Rahul Garg, partnerdirect tax at PwC India.
RajeshHGandhi, partner direct tax, Deloitte, said, “Introducing the LTCG tax could spook the markets.People may not mind the 15 per cent tax if the holding period goes up.” However, there were also representations on the adverse effect this could have on institutional investors, said a source aware of these deliberations.
“If the holding period for STCG tax is extended, it could lead to a churn in the market between the Union Budget and April 1 (when the proposal will implemented).Investors that have an incentive to hold shares for one year due to the zero LTCG tax are likely to exit counters they do not want to hold on to for longer periods,” said URBhat, managing director, Dalton Capital Advisors.
According to some other stock market players, this may not be the right time to bring in these changes because the market is the only part of the economy doing rather well.They also said bringing back the LTCG tax or extending the holding period of the STCG could be done only if the STT was removed, otherwise the tax burden would be significantly higher.
As in the past, brokers´ groups have this year again requested the finance ministry to do away with the STT to improve liquidity and the depth of the stock markets.
They have pointed out that the tax on traders amounts to double taxation since, unlike investors, they are assessed under the head ´business income´ wherein gains are taxed at the rate of 30 per cent plus surcharge and cess.
The STT is in addition to this 30 per cent tax. Alternative investment funds have informed the ministry about their set of demands.Industry players want clarity on the GST on management fees and expenses to be borne by foreign investors of domestic alternative investment funds.
Overseas money in alternative investment funds managed by Indian asset management companies are not exempt from the GST, which effectively adds 18 per cent to the cost of management.This could discourage managers from setting up India based funds, experts said.
Alternative investment funds want losses on investments to be available to investors for setoff. According to the Finance Act, 2015, unitholders cannot offset losses from the fund against other profits and gains.For CategoryIand II alternative investment funds, any loss atafund level is not allowed to be passed through to investors but is carried over at the fund level to be set off against income of the next year.
The other long standing demand is for Category III alternative investment funds to be granted pass through status, similar to what the government had provided CategoryIand Category II funds in 2015.The absence of pass through status means that income from such funds will be taxed at the fund level and the tax obligation will not pass through to the unitholders.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 09th January 2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...