Skip to main content

Budget 2018 needn’t be populist

Budget 2018 needn’t be populist
The finance minister will have more opportunities later in the year to woo voters by doling out freebies
A view, currently shared by a large number of people, is that the Union government’s Budget for 2018-19 will be populist. The argument is that this will be the last full Budget of the Modi government in its current tenure. Hence, it will make sense for Finance Minister Arun Jaitley to dole out free bies and concessions in his final Budget in an attempt to woo voters
Such assumptions are flawed, based as they are on an incomplete and outdated understanding of the factors that influence the making of the Budget. In fact, the dates of general elections in 2019 and the presentation of the final Budget of the Modi government are so far removed from each other that Jaitley should not be under any pressure to present a populist Budget next month. Instead, he could well unveil an array of schemes and proposals that he believes are necessary for the economy, even if a few of them could be unpopular.
The next general elections are scheduled in May 2019. An advancement is unlikely. The economy is yet to recover from the disruptions caused first by demonetisation and then by the Goods and Services Tax (GST) rolled out in July 2017. Economic growth is still to gather fresh momentum. With international crude oil prices rising, inflationary pressures in the domestic economy may also increase. It could be argued that farther the dates of the general elections, the better are the chances of the government managing to show a better economy by then.
If the government decides to use the 2018 Budget to offer freebies and concessions for possible electoral gains, such a long gap between their announcement and the date of polling can negate all theoretical electoral gains that the government may hope to make. No voter will remember on the polling day what concessions she was showered with 15 months ago.
The roll-out of the GST has also put paid to hopes of the government to secure voters’ sympathy through Budget concessions. The Union government’s powers to decide on indirect taxes are now substantially curtailed. The GST Council, a body composed of the Union finance minister and other state finance ministers, will now decide on all major indirect tax rates, barring the customs duty. No longer does Jaitley enjoy the exclusive power of using excise and service tax rates to offer concessions.
Decisions of the GST Council are announced outside the Budget and the Union government cannot take credit for such decisions for electoral benefits. Even the rates of direct taxes have by and large stabilised at levels set a few years ago and the finance minister has little leeway in making big changes in the direct tax rates, barring tweaks by way of procedural relaxation or expansion of the scope of exemptions.
The finance minister can still use his budgets to announce decisions on expenditure for various schemes, projects and policies. The fact is Union budgets have increasingly become less important for tax changes and more relevant for the kind of expenditure the government incurs in different sectors of the economy. From that perspective, the 2018 Budget will focus a lot more on the various schemes that the government needs to launch to address, for instance, farmers’ distress or the poor health of the financial sector.
Indeed, such an exercise will not be limited by the Budget. Even after the Budget, the government will be engaged with the needs of the economy to address the existing as well as new concerns. In any case, the finance minister will be free to use the interim Budget that he presents in 2019 to announce schemes and programmes that he could use for possible electoral gains. Such announcements, closer to the general elections, will have a far more measurable impact on voters’ sentiment.
If the convention of the interim Budget bars him from announcing any new schemes with fiscal implications, Jaitley could fall back on another instrument. Like what one of his predecessors, Jaswant Singh, did in January 2004, Jaitley too could come out with a list of attractive schemes, concessions and freebies, a few weeks before he presents the interim Budget in February 2019. That way he would ensure a greater chance of his freebies making a favourable impact on voters’ behaviour in the polling booth.
Finally, if Jaitley does present a populist Budget in February 2018, it may point towards two possible scenarios. One, the Modi government is hoping that its Central Budget schemes could have some positive impact on the crucial assembly elections to be held later this year in Karnataka, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, among others. Two, a plan may be afoot to advance the general elections on the basis of a fresh assessment of the political developments on the ground.


The Business Standard, New Delhi, 8th January 2018

Comments

  1. Fine but nowehere
    in your column you mentioned disadvantage of announcing a populist budget which I had expected

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …