Skip to main content

2017 produced largely satisfactory foreign policy outcomes for India

2017 produced largely satisfactory foreign policy outcomes for India
We should look at our foreign policy options realistically and judge our successes and failures keeping in mind that we do not control the policies of other sovereign countries who may view their interests differently from ours, and that even small countries can be defiant. We cannot also put a limit on the presence of outside powers in our neighbourhood. Shaping our external environment as we like for realising our goals and priorities is not possible
In the light of these caveats and limitations, our foreign policy in 2017 was largely successful in promoting our interests in an uncertain international environment. We have had to cope with the reality of US foreign policy becoming unpredictable and inconsistent under Trump. We have had to deal with China's growing ambitions in Asia and the expansion of its influence in our neighbourhood at our expense.
We have had to cope with the reality of US foreign policy becoming unpredictable and inconsistent under Trump. We have had to deal with China's growing ambitions in Asia and the expansion of its influence in our neighbourhood at our expense. We have had to protect ourselves from the geographic spread of religious extremism and terrorism in a situation where the world is still not united in dealing with this twin menace.
If the US stepped up essentially verbal pressure on Pakistan in 2017 to curb its terrorist links, China countered it by lauding Pakistan's role in combating terrorism. 2017 saw the situation in West Asia — where we have huge energy, manpower and financial interests — becoming ominous with mounting confrontation between Saudi Arabia and Iran, with its sectarian Shia-Sunni dimension.
We have waded through these developments reasonably well in 2017. We managed our relations with Trump, his team and members of his immediate family well. Any untoward escalation of economic differences was avoided. As part of a deepening strategic relationship with America, Japan was brought further into the security fold by its permanent inclusion in July 2017 in the India-US Malabar exercise.
A quadrilateral US-India-Japan-Australia dialogue at official level was initiated in November. As a balancing exercise consistent with our interests, we participated in the Russia-India-China dialogue, the BRICS and SCO forums where we have convergent interests with member countries.2017 was marked by a show of much-needed confidence in dealing with China, both in our opposition to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the handling of the Dokalam standoff. With the US and Japan subscribing to our critique of the BRI and the US embracing the concept of the Indo-Pacific, India's growing regional importance got recognition.
Our continuing tough response on the LoC and rejecting a dialogue unless Pakistan ceased terrorist activity directed at us did not, as in the past, generate any external pressure on us to talk to Islamabad, and to that extent we are now less encumbered diplomatically. Our equities in Afghanistan were recognised in Trump's Af-Pak policy review in August, much to Pakistan's dismay.
China no doubt made gains in Nepal, Sri Lanka and Maldives in 2017 at our expense, compounding our longstanding difficulties with these countries. But we too were able to raise our profile with China's neighbours such as Japan, and oppose China's position on South China Sea and UNCLOS issues. We navigated ourselves reasonably well on the Myanmar-Bangladesh refugee rift, with requisite political and humanitarian gestures.
Our success in not only  delinking our relations with Israel from those with Arab countries but also separately fortifying ties with both continued in 2017, especially with Modi's path-breaking visit to Israel in July. With Russia, despite concerns about its overtures to Pakistan and the Taliban, Modi was able to renew understandings with Putin during his June visit to St. Petersburg.On the whole, 2017 produced satisfactory foreign policy outcomes.
The Economic Times, New Delhi, 03rd January 2018


Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Firms with sales below Rs.50 crore out of ambit

The tax department has reiterated that the PoEM rules, which require foreign firms to pay taxes in India if the effective control is here, will not apply to companies withaturnover of Rs.50 crore or less inafinancial year. Last month, the tax department had come out with the longawaited Place of Effective Management (PoEM) rules, which require foreign companies in India and Indian firms with overseas subsidiaries to pay local taxes if their businesses are effectively controlled by Indians. Then the rules did not setathreshold above which they were to apply. However, the accompanying press release states that the rules will not apply to companies withaturnover of up to Rs.50 crore inayear. That created confusion whether the threshold will be adhered to. Inacircular to clarify things, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) said the provision "shall not apply toacompany havingaturnover or gross receipts of ~50 crore or less inafinancial year".

PoEM rules essentially target shell …