Skip to main content

Sebi norm on profit-sharing puzzles firms

Sebi norm on profit-sharing puzzles firms
Norms issued by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) on profit-sharing agreements have forced companies to seek clarifications.
A round six companies have sought informal guidance over applicability of the provisions in various situations.
An informal guidance is a method for entities to seek interpretation from the market regulator on any regulation, circular or guideline. Although Sebi acts in accordance with an informal guidance, it is not a binding obligation.
Legal experts say there are many grey areas in the circular issued by Sebi in November last year to curb profit-sharing arrangements, which are typically side-deals between the managements of companies and private equity investors.
One of the key issues is how “profit” is interpreted because there is no standard definition, experts point out. Further, it is unclear whether the provisions are applicable to payments made in unlisted subsidiaries of listed companies. Also, whether a payment made by an investor after exiting the stock can be construed as a profit-sharing agreement.
Many such situations have cropped up in the past year, forcing companies to seek clarity from Sebi. Section 26(6) of the Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements (LODR), which deals with profit-sharing agreements, states: “No employee, including key managerial personnel or director or promoter of a listed entity, shall enter into any agreement for himself or on behalf of any other person with regard to compensation or profit sharing…unless prior approval has been obtained from the board of directors as well as public shareholders.”
According to Sumit Agrawal, partner, Suvan Law Advisors, this regulation permits scope for interpretation. “There are at least two views available. An agreement which is not for ‘compensation or profit sharing’ and in connection with dealings in the securities of such listed companies that are allowed without approval of the board or public shareholders. Even the revenue-sharing agreements require preapproval. Some structures are also available for non-employee consultants,” he pointed out.
“Sebi has kept the provisions open to interpretation because if it lays out specific conditions, companies will find a way around them. The middle path is for Sebi to release an FAQ on the subject,” said another lawyer. In a recent application for informal guidance, PNB Housing Finance said Destimoney Enterprises held a 49 per cent stake in the NBFC since 2009. It made a complete exit from PNB Housing Finance in 2015 and it wanted to pay the top management some money as a token of its appreciation for the apprciation of its invetement. The issue was not taken up at that time as there was no regulatory clarity.
In 2016, PNB Housing was listed and Destimoney proposed to offer the incentive again. PNB Housing asked Sebi if it could accept the offer. In its reply, Sebi stated although all the events occurred when the company was unlisted, the consideration for payment was being made when the company was listed and hence it had to comply with the regulation.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 14th December 2017


Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …