Skip to main content

RBI should ensure fair MDR share ePayment companies

RBI should ensure fair MDR share ePayment companies
While the Reserve Bank of India’s latest guidelines on merchant discount rates (MDR) have brought some respite to the digital payments industry, many payment executives ET spoke to feel that the central bank needs to ensure equitable distribution of MDR between the various participants of digital transactions.
MDR is the amount paid by a merchant for a digital transaction and it is shared by multiple parties - the bank which issues the card, the acquiring bank which onboards the merchant, the network companies who process the transactions and the players who deploy the payment solution.
As of now, the share of MDR is higher for the issuing entity while the acquiring company gets a much smaller share. Further, with the new rates from the regulator, payment companies fear their margins could be under further stress.
While the maximum cap on MDR has been decided by theRBI, what needs to be done is that the ratio of split between the acquiring company and the issuing entity needs to be decided in such a way that there is a balance and the terminal deployers can make some money from the business,” said MN Srinivasu, cofounder of Billdesk, one of the largest payment gateway companies in the country.
“The financial model for entities who deploy the payment terminals is very tight. In some cases less than 0.1%. This hampers development of payments in smaller cities,” said Amrish Rau, MDof digital payment company PayU India.
Vishwas Patel, founder of payment gateway company CCAvenue, said the country already has more than 800 million debit cards. What it needs now is many more terminals and for that to happen the lopsided fee structure for issuers need to be made equitable.
On Wednesday, RBI said that for merchants with an annual turnover of less than Rs 20 lakh, MDR is 0.4% and for those above Rs 20 lakh the rate is 0.9%. But payment executives feel that this formof MDR classification makes calculations a bit cumbersome and throws technological challenges. Although it will be smooth for newer merchants, it would be a huge challenge for older ones to classify them, they say.
“For the entire payments ecosystem, a massive migration needs to happen since historically card networks have never categorised merchants in this manner, it is bound to lead to operational challenges,” said Srinivasu from Billdesk.
“I believe the Rs 20 lakh-slab is too low. Many merchants in the Rs 30-40 lakh category started adopting digital transactions only recently and they were showing good traction. But now, with a higher MDR, they might resist card payments,” aid Rajeev Agrawal, chief executive of Innoviti Payments which deploys PoS terminals for banks at merchant outlets. Rau from PayU said a lion’s share of their merchants selling goods online generate revenue of more than Rs 20 lakh. Hence, all of them would get clubbed into the higher MDR slab.

The Economic Times, New Delhi, 8th November 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI deputy governor cautions fintech platform lenders on privacy concerns during loan recovery

  India's digital lending infrastructure has made the loan sanctioning system online. Yet, loan recovery still needs a “feet on the street” approach, Swaminathan J, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at a media event on Tuesday, September 2, according to news agency ANI.According to the ANI report, the deputy governor flagged that fintech operators in the digital lending segment are giving out loans to customers with poor credit profiles and later using aggressive recovery tactics.“While loan sanctioning and disbursement have become increasingly digital, effective collection and recovery still require a 'feet on the street' and empathetic approach. Many fintech platforms operate on a business model that involves extending small-value loans to customers often with poor credit profiles,” Swaminathan J said.   Fintech platforms' business models The central bank deputy governor highlighted that many fintech platforms' business models involve providing sm

Credit card spending growth declines on RBI gaze, stress build-up

  Credit card spends have further slowed down to 16.6 per cent in the current financial year (FY25), following the Reserve Bank of India’s tightening of unsecured lending norms and rising delinquencies, and increased stress in the portfolio.Typically, during the festival season (September–December), credit card spends peak as several credit card-issuing banks offer discounts and cashbacks on e-commerce and other platforms. This is a reversal of trend in the past three financial years stretching to FY21 due to RBI’s restrictions.In the previous financial year (FY24), credit card spends rose by 27.8 per cent, but were low compared to FY23 which surged by 47.5 per cent. In FY22, the spending increased 54.1 per cent, according to data compiled by Macquarie Research.ICICI Bank recorded 4.4 per cent gross credit losses in its FY24 credit card portfolio as against 3.2 per cent year-on-year. SBI Cards’ credit losses in the segment stood at 7.4 per cent in FY24 and 6.2 per cent in FY23, the rep

India can't rely on wealthy to drive growth: Ex-RBI Dy Guv Viral Acharya

  India can’t rely on wealthy individuals to drive growth and expect the overall economy to improve, Viral Acharya, former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Monday.Acharya, who is the C V Starr Professor of Economics in the Department of Finance at New York University’s Stern School of Business (NYU-Stern), said after the Covid-19 pandemic, rural consumption and investments have weakened.We can’t be pumping our growth through the rich and expect that the economy as a whole will do better,” he said while speaking at an event organised by Elara Capital here.f there has to be a trickle-down, it should have actually happened by now,” Acharya said, adding that when the rich keep getting wealthier and wealthier, they have a savings problem.   “The bank account keeps getting bigger, hence they look for financial assets to invest in. India is closed, so our money can't go outside India that easily. So, it has to chase the limited financial assets in the country and