Skip to main content

PEs, NBFCs move to take more control of real estate projects

PEs, NBFCs move to take more control of real estate projects
Private equity firms and NBFCs are taking more control in real estate projects, tightening underwriting norms and taking stock of the overall financial health of the developer in transactions
As defaults rise and balance sheets of real estate firms weaken, private equity (PE) firms and non-banking financial companies (NBFC) are taking more control in projects, tightening underwriting norms and taking stock of the overall financial health of the developer in transactions
Since project financing is the lifeline of residential projects and new real estate regulations come with stiff penalties, it is imperative that the investment strategy is recalibrated, investors said.
“While investing these days, realty funds, particularly equity investors, pay significant attention, in their due diligence process, to the developer’s overall ability to raise money in the proposed investment and see that their investment may not get undesired reputation risk due to developer’s defaults in some other projects,” said Anuranjan Mohnot, managing director at investment firm Amplus Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd, part of the Lalbhai Group whose flagship company is Arvind Ltd.
“Developers’ financial condition and defaults are major issues while investing today. RERA ( Real Estate Regulation and Development Act, 2016,) has by and large stopped flow of funds from one project to another project of the same developer and hence it may happen that some projects of a developer may be doing fine but others are starving for liquidity. Such cases may have a serious impact on the developer’s credit score and may impact his further fund-raising ability,” Mohnot said.
To be sure, investors haven’t tightened their purse strings but they are more cautious, inking deals with only those who they trust or do multiple transactions with the same developer partner. “We place a great deal of emphasis and importance on the strength of the developer’s balance sheet rather than just restricting our analysis to the project in question. This enables us to both cross collateralise our funding as well as ensure stringent financial health parameters for our choice of counterparts,” said Khushru Jijina, head of Piramal Finance Ltd.
Jijina added that more than ever before, in the post-RERA world, underwriting parameters have to incorporate the various provisions that have been implemented as part of the Act.Piramal’s Jijina added that its investment team has recalibrated its underwriting norms and the teams have changed its documentation of escrow accounts and monitoring process to adapt to RERA parameters.
The sector has witnessed a four-year-long slowdown and there is no apparent revival in sight, putting investors, both domestic and offshore, on a cautious path.
Amar Merani, managing director and chief executive of Xander Finance Pvt. Ltd, an NBFC, said one digs deeper these days into quality of sales and collections, cost analysis to complete projects and sufficiency of approvals to develop unhindered along with “the skin in the game for the developer.”
In recent months, many investors have been lending against a bunch of projects of a single developer in one deal, which is a new trend, and that adjusts the risk quotient and assures returns, compared to investing in a single project.
“Investing in a bouquet of projects helps both the lender and developer. The builder’s debt can be consolidated under a single lender, giving more power to the latter because he gains more control. It also gives more flexibility to the developer in terms of repayments,” said an executive at a global investment firm, requesting anonymity.
“With defaults rising in real estate, investors have become realistic and are evaluating (deals) more seriously. They are taking control of more projects to avoid default in a single project, transacting with known rather than unknown developers,” said Shobhit Agarwal, managing director (capital markets and international director) JLL India.
The Mint, New Delhi, 18th December 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …