Skip to main content

No change in norms RBI defends inspection regim

No change in norms RBI defends inspection regim
The Reserve Bank of India defended its inspection regime and said that the divergence between the actual numbers reported by the banks and its assessment of bad loans is nothing extraordinary, and it is not moving the goal post. The only difference now, the central bank asserted, is that banks are disclosing these numbers, unlike in the past.
Speaking for the first time on the issue of banks reporting huge divergences at the end of the September quarter earnings, the Reserve Bank of India on Wednesday said that the banks had not followed RBI’s asset classifications rules to the tee. “I want to make it very clear that there has been no change in the goal post, the rules haven’t changed,” said NS Vishwanathan, deputy governor, RBI. “We have assessed the banks classification on rules as they are today. We have found that in some cases, they have not applied those criteria.”
The RBI’s scrutiny of non-performing assets has raised several concerns on how asset classification is being done by banks and its auditors. Three private sector banks have in all reported over Rs 12,000 crore in asset classification divergences for FY17 so far.
Yes Bank BSE 1.71 % reported a divergence of Rs 6,355 crore for FY17, while this number was at Rs 4,177 crore for FY16.
Yes Bank is not the only one though; even the gold standard in Indian banking HDFC BankBSE 0.53 % had to bear the brunt of the regulator’s audit when it was directed to classify a standard account to NPA category.
Another private sector lender Axis BankBSE 0.73 %, which is currently struggling under the burden of its legacy infrastructure loans, reported a divergence of Rs 5,633 crore for FY17 while this was at Rs 9,480 crore for FY16.“We are obedient children, they (RBI) told us do it, we did it,” said Shikha Sharma, chief executive, Axis Bank, in an interview to ET in October this year.
“We have taken the pain of doing what they told us to do. These cases are not even NPAs with the lead banks. What we are saying is that we were not trying to hide anything. We are not even the lead bank in these cases.”But the market, investors and experts are seeing these divergences as not only negative surprises but also a question mark on the management’s and its auditor’s inability to properly assess stress in the company’s portfolio.
“Divergences on the basis of inspection used to happen in the past as well, what has changed is the transparency that we have brought in the form of disclosure of divergences when they are more than a certain percentage, that has changed the narrative,” Vishwanathan explained.
The Economic Times, New Delhi, 7th December 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …