Skip to main content

GST maze leaves exporters sulking for refunds

GST maze leaves exporters sulking for refunds
In its 22nd meeting on October 6, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council had asked the government to quickly refund to exporters the Integrated GST (IGST) paid on goods exported.Finance Minister Arun Jaitley announced that refunds will start from October 10, for exports made in July, and from October 18, for exports made in August.
However, most exporters have so far not received refund of the IGST paid in July or subsequent months.The Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) issuedacircular on November 7, stating that refunds of the IGST paid on export goods cannot be made in many cases due to errors in export report/manifest (EGM), shipping bill and GSTR1 returns of outward supplies for July
The CBEC said that common errors include incorrect shipping bill number in July GSTR1 (that can be corrected only through Table 9 of August GSTR1), mismatch of invoice number and IGST paid amount in the shipping bill and GSTR1, mismatch of information filed in EGM and shipping bill or nonfiling of EGM, wrong bank account details given to Customs and manual shipping bills filed at some Inland Container Depots.
However, these discrepancies do not explain why most exporters have still not received refund of IGST paid on export goods.Investigations reveal that the EDI (electronic data interchange) system of the Customs is not suitably amended to take care of the new requirements under the GST laws and that is why the refunds are delayed.

An example would make this clear.An exporter prepares his GST invoice for exports of goods worth $100. If we take the exchange rate to be Rs 65.43 per dollar, the taxable value of the goods is Rs 6,543. Now, he calculates 18 per cent IGST on the value, which works out to Rs 1,177.74. So, he rounds it up to Rs 1,178, because in accordance with Section 170 of the Central GST Act, 2017, he is required to round up the amount to nearest rupee.

However, when he files the shipping bill in the Customs EDI system, it automatically drops the paise and rounds up the tax amount as Rs 1,177. When he files his monthly return in GSTR1, the exporter enters the tax amount as Rs 1,178, according to his invoice.
When the GST Network (GSTN) sends this detail to the Customs EDI system, the tax amount does not tally.So, the exporter´s refund claim does not get processed.If this was the only problem, at least 50 per cent of the exporters, who had to ignore fifty paise or less for the purpose of rounding up to the nearest rupee, should have got their refunds.But it is not that simple.
Exporters include several items in one invoice, work out the tax amount for each, aggregate the tax amount and then round off to the nearest rupee, whereas the Customs EDI works out the tax amount for each item ignoring the paise and then sum up the tax amount for the invoices.
Here is the example: In this invoice (see chart),the exporter rounds off the tax amount to Rs 5,300 in his invoice and reports it in his GSTR1 returns. But this amount does not tally with the tax amount of Rs 5,298 in the shipping bill
As the number of items increases and tax rates differ, the difference can be more.So, the Customs EDI software needs to be amended suitably.The second problem is that the Customs EDI system does not have a separate field to capture GST Invoice number and date.The exporters have entered these details along with description of goods or at any place convenient.
Now, the exporter reports the shipping bill number and date and the corresponding GST invoice number and date in his GSTR1 returns and the GSTN sends the same details to the Customs, where there is no automatic matching of the invoice number and date.
The CBEC blames exporters for giving different GST invoice numbers and IGST amounts in the GSTR1 returns and for Customs purposes.It is possible that there are cases of wrong mention of shipping bill number or GST invoice number or IGST paid amount, but such cases are likely to be very few.
For correcting these, the CBEC has asked the GSTN to make the Table 9A of the August return available.The best course for CBEC is to disburse the IGST amount shown in the shipping bill or invoice straight away till the Customs EDI software is set right.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 1st November 2017


Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …