Skip to main content

Growth in Q2 could be higher as GST revenues still pouring in

Growth in Q2 could be higher as GST revenues still pouring in
Chief statistician TCA Anant on Thursday said India’s economic growth in the July-September quarter could be higher than 6.3% as indirect taxes are still being collected on account of the goods and services tax GST) which was rolled out on July 1.
“It is likely that when revised estimates are prepared, indirect tax collections for this period may actually be higher than what we have reported,” Anant said at a press conference while admitting that the GST introduced a “certain level of statistical challenge” in compiling the growth numbers.
India’s growth as measured by the gross domestic product (GDP) was 6.3% in the second quarter, up from 5.7% in the previous quarter which according to Anant “shows a significant trend reversal in growth rates, indicating it is returning to more normal levels”.
He said manufacturing has shown a revival and capital goods production has picked up but construction continues to be slow but is expected to increase. Agriculture sector performance, he said, was held up because of the non-crop segment. Manufacturing grew 7% while agriculture growth was 1.7%, down from 2.3% in the trailing quarter.
GST has consolidated central and local taxes including value added tax, excise and service tax into a single levy. According to Anant, GDP could also be an underestimation on account of sales tax collection as many proxies were used to calculate it but the higher mop up could reflect in the revised growth data.
Anant said though there was no impact of inventory pile up on the gross value addition (GVA) account of GST rollout in the second quarter, the ripples can be felt in the third quarter. “It’s possible that anticipating the need for the festive season, most of the production went into the sale and inventory restocking may happen later…inventory accumulation effect may persist in the third quarter as well,” he explained.
Commenting on the demonetisation drive last year and its impact on India’s growth, Anant said the move will be very hard to read from GDP numbers. He explained that normal trading practices and a lot of trade in India, particularly in the informal sector, is based on relationship-based trading due to which cash transactions can also be substituted with informal cred.“My suspicion is that a lot of the claims of the impact of demonetisation in agriculture simply does not account for the presence of such relationships in the sector,” he said.
The Economic Times, New Delhi, 1st November 2017


Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit