Skip to main content

Govt likely to give Sebi powers to regulate private placements

Govt likely to give Sebi powers to regulate private placements
The government is planning to relax a few key norms in the Companies Act to give Sebi more powers over private placements so that there's no conflict with the proposed crowdfunding norms.
The government is likely to give the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) the power to regulate private placements by any Indian entity at a time when the capital markets regulator is finalizing norms for crowdfunding, said two people with direct knowledge of ongoing discussions between the regulator, the ministry of corporate affairs (MCA) and the ministry of finance.
At present, private placements by unlisted firms are regulated by the MCA, while Sebi regulates fundraising activities by listed firms.Private placement means raising funds from less than 200 investors in a financial year. Funds raised from more than 200 investors automatically becomes a public offering and the issuer has to list these securities.
Following a meeting in Delhi earlier this month, MCA, Sebi and the ministry of finance are planning to relax a few key norms in the Companies Act and allow the capital markets regulator more powers over private placements so that there is no conflict with the proposed crowdfunding rules.
Emails sent to Sebi, MCA and the ministry of finance remained unanswered.On 20 November, Mint had reported that the government may exempt crowdfunding activities from provisions of the Companies Act as it seeks to bring such fundraising under the regulatory ambit of Sebi and allow start-ups to raise funds easily.
Under the new norms being planned, start-ups will be allowed to make a fund-raising offer to more than 200 investors—without breaching Companies Act norms—through their prospectus and advertisements on digital platforms, which will be licensed and regulated by Sebi.

Crowdfunding is defined as raising of money from a large number of individuals, typically through the internet or social media, to finance a new business venture. Currently, Sebi is in the process of framing a dedicated set of rules for crowdfunding.

“For any start-up, if the number of investors actually investing exceeds 200, it should be brought under crowdfunding norms and if the number is less than 200, it should be brought under private placement guidelines,” said one of the two people cited earlier on condition of anonymity.

“It is not fair to make early-stage companies adhere to all the stringent public issue norms just because more than 200 people happened to view the fundraising advertisement. But before bringing norms for crowdfunding, it is necessary to put in place appropriate private placement norms,” added this person.

Under current norms, it is difficult to distinguish a private placement platform from a crowdfunding platform, the second person said, also on condition of anonymity.
According to Shanti Mohan, chief executive officer of LetsVenture Online Pte. Ltd, a start-up funding platform, the collective approach by Sebi and MCA to ease the way start-up funding is regulated is encouraging.Start-ups should be allowed to pitch to investors with no limit on the number, Mohan said.
“However, the start-up should know who is being pitched (to). I believe the audience should still be curated and not public at large.This will allow investors to understand entrepreneurship better and will foster innovation,” she added.Sebi has been looking to regulate crowdfunding for quite some time now and has cautioned investors at least twice over the last two years.
In October, the regulator wrote to at least a dozen start-up fundraising platforms in India seeking details of the detailed fund-flow process on these platforms, the process of registering investors and companies on them, the minimum subscription amounts and the platforms’ compliance with private placement norms under the Companies Act. Additionally, Sebi asked how order matching of the shares offered in private placements was done by the company or the platform, and the form of settlement mechanism, among other things.
The Mint, New Delhi, 26th December 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …