Skip to main content

Complications in GST anti profiteering rules

Complications in GST anti profiteering rules
The official form for making complaints under the antiprofiteering mechanism in the goods and services tax (GST) regime defeats the purpose —to help consumers get the full benefit of tax cuts and input tax credits.The form, APAF1, requires a consumer to file in detail the cost structure of the company against which a complaint is made for profiteering
Also, details on sale price, taxes, both preGST and postGST, benefits of input tax credits, etc.Rajeev Dimri, partner with consultancy Deloitte India, asked how consumers could be expected to know all these details, particularly of cost structures, when even many insiders in such a company wouldn´t be aware of these
Abhishek Jain, tax partner with EY India, said it also appeared that a separate application might be needed for each good or service in reference to which antiprofiteering is alleged.Pratik Jain of consultancy PwC India agreed the level of information asked for in the antiprofiteering form seemed too detailed for a common citizen
"It might be more realistic for consumers to reach out to the GST commissioners, who could make enquiries and get the relevant information and then file a profiteering complaint on behalf of consumers.The government might want to consider a simpler form for consumers," he added.Another expert said the government probably wanted to avoid frivolous complaints and hence such a tedious mechanism.
The government is also yet to issue guidelines on what constitutes profiteering.It recently set upa National AntiProfiteering Authority, amid reports that some companies, particularly restaurants, were not passing on the benefit of GST rate cuts to consumers.BN Sharma, additional secretary in the department of revenue, is chairman of the Authority.In its latest meeting in November, the GST Council had cut rates onalittle over 200 items.
As many as 176 items saw a cut from 28 per cent to 18 per cent.This leaves only 50 items which attract the highest GST rate of 28 per cent.Also, the tax rate on restaurants, barring those in starhotels, was cut to five per cent from 18 per cent, although their input tax credit was removed
In addition to the Authority, the institutional mechanism for effective implementation of the antiprofiteering measures enshrined in the GST rules consists of a standing committee, state level screening committees and the Directorate General of Safeguards in the Central Board of Excise &Customs (CBEC).
Consumers who say there has been no commensurate reduction in prices may apply for relief to the screening committee in the state concerned.After forming a prima facie view on the substance of the application, the matter would be referred to the standing committee at the Centre
The latter will, in turn, ask the Director General of Safeguards for a detailed investigation, the findings to go to the Authority.The screening committee is expected to look into complaints of local nature; the standing committee would ordinarily enquire into cases of mass impact, with all India ramifications
Most complaints so far on profiteering with screening committees and the standing committee relate to restaurants and the real estate sector.Once the Authority confirms there is a justification to apply antiprofiteering measures, it has the power to order the business concerned to reduce its prices or return the undue benefit availed of, with interest atarate of 18 per cent, to the consumers of the goods or services.
If the undue benefit cannot be passed on to consumers, it can be ordered to be deposited in the Consumer Welfare Fund.The Authority also has the power to impose a penalty on the defaulting business or even cancellation of its GST registration
The form, APAF1, requires consumers to file in detail the cost structure of firms against which a complaint is made for profiteering Details on sale price, taxes, both preGST and postGST,benefits of input tax credits, among others, also have to be produced.Govt is yet to issue guidelines on what constitutes profiteering  Most complaints on profiteering relate to restaurants, real estate sector
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 8th November 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI deputy governor cautions fintech platform lenders on privacy concerns during loan recovery

  India's digital lending infrastructure has made the loan sanctioning system online. Yet, loan recovery still needs a “feet on the street” approach, Swaminathan J, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at a media event on Tuesday, September 2, according to news agency ANI.According to the ANI report, the deputy governor flagged that fintech operators in the digital lending segment are giving out loans to customers with poor credit profiles and later using aggressive recovery tactics.“While loan sanctioning and disbursement have become increasingly digital, effective collection and recovery still require a 'feet on the street' and empathetic approach. Many fintech platforms operate on a business model that involves extending small-value loans to customers often with poor credit profiles,” Swaminathan J said.   Fintech platforms' business models The central bank deputy governor highlighted that many fintech platforms' business models involve providing sm

Credit card spending growth declines on RBI gaze, stress build-up

  Credit card spends have further slowed down to 16.6 per cent in the current financial year (FY25), following the Reserve Bank of India’s tightening of unsecured lending norms and rising delinquencies, and increased stress in the portfolio.Typically, during the festival season (September–December), credit card spends peak as several credit card-issuing banks offer discounts and cashbacks on e-commerce and other platforms. This is a reversal of trend in the past three financial years stretching to FY21 due to RBI’s restrictions.In the previous financial year (FY24), credit card spends rose by 27.8 per cent, but were low compared to FY23 which surged by 47.5 per cent. In FY22, the spending increased 54.1 per cent, according to data compiled by Macquarie Research.ICICI Bank recorded 4.4 per cent gross credit losses in its FY24 credit card portfolio as against 3.2 per cent year-on-year. SBI Cards’ credit losses in the segment stood at 7.4 per cent in FY24 and 6.2 per cent in FY23, the rep

India can't rely on wealthy to drive growth: Ex-RBI Dy Guv Viral Acharya

  India can’t rely on wealthy individuals to drive growth and expect the overall economy to improve, Viral Acharya, former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Monday.Acharya, who is the C V Starr Professor of Economics in the Department of Finance at New York University’s Stern School of Business (NYU-Stern), said after the Covid-19 pandemic, rural consumption and investments have weakened.We can’t be pumping our growth through the rich and expect that the economy as a whole will do better,” he said while speaking at an event organised by Elara Capital here.f there has to be a trickle-down, it should have actually happened by now,” Acharya said, adding that when the rich keep getting wealthier and wealthier, they have a savings problem.   “The bank account keeps getting bigger, hence they look for financial assets to invest in. India is closed, so our money can't go outside India that easily. So, it has to chase the limited financial assets in the country and