Skip to main content

Complications in GST anti profiteering rules

Complications in GST anti profiteering rules
The official form for making complaints under the antiprofiteering mechanism in the goods and services tax (GST) regime defeats the purpose —to help consumers get the full benefit of tax cuts and input tax credits.The form, APAF1, requires a consumer to file in detail the cost structure of the company against which a complaint is made for profiteering
Also, details on sale price, taxes, both preGST and postGST, benefits of input tax credits, etc.Rajeev Dimri, partner with consultancy Deloitte India, asked how consumers could be expected to know all these details, particularly of cost structures, when even many insiders in such a company wouldn´t be aware of these
Abhishek Jain, tax partner with EY India, said it also appeared that a separate application might be needed for each good or service in reference to which antiprofiteering is alleged.Pratik Jain of consultancy PwC India agreed the level of information asked for in the antiprofiteering form seemed too detailed for a common citizen
"It might be more realistic for consumers to reach out to the GST commissioners, who could make enquiries and get the relevant information and then file a profiteering complaint on behalf of consumers.The government might want to consider a simpler form for consumers," he added.Another expert said the government probably wanted to avoid frivolous complaints and hence such a tedious mechanism.
The government is also yet to issue guidelines on what constitutes profiteering.It recently set upa National AntiProfiteering Authority, amid reports that some companies, particularly restaurants, were not passing on the benefit of GST rate cuts to consumers.BN Sharma, additional secretary in the department of revenue, is chairman of the Authority.In its latest meeting in November, the GST Council had cut rates onalittle over 200 items.
As many as 176 items saw a cut from 28 per cent to 18 per cent.This leaves only 50 items which attract the highest GST rate of 28 per cent.Also, the tax rate on restaurants, barring those in starhotels, was cut to five per cent from 18 per cent, although their input tax credit was removed
In addition to the Authority, the institutional mechanism for effective implementation of the antiprofiteering measures enshrined in the GST rules consists of a standing committee, state level screening committees and the Directorate General of Safeguards in the Central Board of Excise &Customs (CBEC).
Consumers who say there has been no commensurate reduction in prices may apply for relief to the screening committee in the state concerned.After forming a prima facie view on the substance of the application, the matter would be referred to the standing committee at the Centre
The latter will, in turn, ask the Director General of Safeguards for a detailed investigation, the findings to go to the Authority.The screening committee is expected to look into complaints of local nature; the standing committee would ordinarily enquire into cases of mass impact, with all India ramifications
Most complaints so far on profiteering with screening committees and the standing committee relate to restaurants and the real estate sector.Once the Authority confirms there is a justification to apply antiprofiteering measures, it has the power to order the business concerned to reduce its prices or return the undue benefit availed of, with interest atarate of 18 per cent, to the consumers of the goods or services.
If the undue benefit cannot be passed on to consumers, it can be ordered to be deposited in the Consumer Welfare Fund.The Authority also has the power to impose a penalty on the defaulting business or even cancellation of its GST registration
The form, APAF1, requires consumers to file in detail the cost structure of firms against which a complaint is made for profiteering Details on sale price, taxes, both preGST and postGST,benefits of input tax credits, among others, also have to be produced.Govt is yet to issue guidelines on what constitutes profiteering  Most complaints on profiteering relate to restaurants, real estate sector
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 8th November 2017


Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Firms with sales below Rs.50 crore out of ambit

The tax department has reiterated that the PoEM rules, which require foreign firms to pay taxes in India if the effective control is here, will not apply to companies withaturnover of Rs.50 crore or less inafinancial year. Last month, the tax department had come out with the longawaited Place of Effective Management (PoEM) rules, which require foreign companies in India and Indian firms with overseas subsidiaries to pay local taxes if their businesses are effectively controlled by Indians. Then the rules did not setathreshold above which they were to apply. However, the accompanying press release states that the rules will not apply to companies withaturnover of up to Rs.50 crore inayear. That created confusion whether the threshold will be adhered to. Inacircular to clarify things, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) said the provision "shall not apply toacompany havingaturnover or gross receipts of ~50 crore or less inafinancial year".

PoEM rules essentially target shell …