Skip to main content

Sebi speeds up adjudicating proceedings to clear backlog of cases

Sebi speeds up adjudicating proceedings to clear backlog of cases
Cases expedited after finance bill, 2017 cleasr air over its discretionary powers
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has begun hastening the passing of adjudicating orders to clear the backlog of cases that had piled up over the past couple of years, following uncertainty over its powers to impose discretionary penalties.The market watchdog has also expanded its team of adjudicating officers (AOs) to 11, from five less than a year ago, said a person familiar with the matter
“More AOs will help clear the backlog created on account of the Roofit matter. Additional AOs may also expedite the process of passing orders. But, to provide impetus to the whole process of disposal, the regulator needs to lay stress on settlement of proceedings as well," said R S Loona, managing partner, Alliance Law.The Supreme Court (SC), in the matter of Roofit Industries in November 2015, had said Sebi had no discretionary power under Section 15J of the Sebi Act, 1992, to reduce penalties imposed on companies.
Following the judgment, penalties worth crores of rupees were levied by Sebi in various cases. This led to the Securities Appellate Tribunal remanding several matters back to the market regulator and quite a few appeals being withdrawn by appellants fearing higher penalties.Last year, Sebi itself had filed for a review before the apex court on the Roofit judgment. During its pendency, a two-member Bench of the SC had differed with Roofit judgment in the matter of Siddharth Chaturvedi versus Sebi. In its order of March 2016 in this case, the Bench had referred the matter to a three-member SC Bench, creating further ambiguity regarding imposition of penalties.
Earlier this year, the Finance Bill, 2017 inserted an explanation that did away with ambiguity regarding Sebi’s discretionary powers in deciding the amount of penalty on companies.The backlog of cases is mostly for offences committed between October 2002 and September 2014, as the penal provisions of the Sebi Act were amended with effect from September 2014.
According to experts, Sebi should look at further increasing the number of AOs. They could also disclose the date of showcause notice, in addition to the hearing dates on their website, so as to ascertain time taken in adjudication proceedings.“There are times when parties drag the proceedings using dilatory tactics, while there are also instances when AOs themselves take time, due to inertia or involvement of high-profile people. In addition to augmenting its administrative infrastructure, there should be an internal mechanism to track the time taken to issue a showcause notice and thereafter pass an order," said Sumit Agrawal, partner, Suvan Law Advisors.
Experts also said Sebi should try to focus on serious violations, particularly the ones having market-wide ramifications, rather than minor infractions.“Non-compliance of certain non-critical disclosures could be dealt with by levying standard penalties, instead of going for full-fledged adjudicating proceedings or levying heavy penalties. Some of this work could be delegated to the exchanges as well," said Alliance Law’s Loona.
The Roofit Episode
In the matter of Roofit Industries in Nov 2015, SC ruled that Sebi had no discretionary powers to decide on penalties Following judgment, Sebi started levying flat/maximum penalties Sebi asked for a review of SC’s decision after being criticised for levying high penaltiesIn another case, in March 2015, a division Bench of SC differed with Roofit judgmentMatter referred to a larger SC BenchSAT started sending several matters back to Sebi, reportedly because of maximum penalties in all casesAn explanation in the Finance Bill, 2017 has given back Sebi its discretionary powers in terms of amount of penalty to be imposed  This will provide relief for alleged offences committed between Oct 2002 and Sep 2014
The Business Standard, New Delhi, Ist November 2017


Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …