Skip to main content

Realty contractors move court over discrepancy in GST rates

Realty contractors move court over discrepancy in GST rates
If a real estate developer or an infrastructure contractor is incurring more cost due to the goods and services tax, should the consumer pay him for that? Why not, ask developers.In what is exactly opposite of anti-profiteering, real estate contractors have dragged the government of India and the GST Council to Delhi High Court, demanding that their losses due to GST be made good.
The problem is due to what they call a discrepancy in GST rates for contractors and subcontractors.While the government has fixed 18% GST for under-construction properties, it has allowed deduction of land value by the developer, making his effective tax rate 12%. But the subcontractor has to pay full 18%.
Now, this difference in tax rate cannot be passed on to the developer and thereby to the final consumer, the contractors said in a writ petition filed in the Delhi High Court on Wednesday.So they want the government and GST Council to fix the anomaly and bring parity in GST rates charged from contractors and subcontractors, or provide a mechanism to make good their losses
If there is an anti-profiteering mechanism to ensure tax benefits are passed on to consumers, then why not the opposite, they ask.“There is a clear case of discrepancy, unintended perhaps, in the GST rate for contractors and sub-contractors and this would lead to additional cost for the sub-contractors of infrastructure and real estate projects when the prices are fixed,” said Abhishek A Rastogi, partner at law firm Khaitan & Co.
Sub-contractors now want the additional 6% GST they pay to be reimbursed.“There should be a mechanism, in line with anti-profiteering, where if loss is incurred due to GST rates it has be made good,” said Rastogi who is an advocate on record for subcontractors. He hoped that the anti-profiteering authority formed by the government will address a “reverse anti-profiteering” situation when a business-to-business supplier is at a loss due to GST.
Industry experts pointed out that almost all the infrastructure projects and many real estate projects are partly or fully constructed by sub-contractors.Nayan Shah, president-elect at realty developers body CREDAI-MCHI, called for bringing down goods and services tax on consumer contract to single digit, between 6-8%, which would ensure that there is no revenue loss to the exchequer.

The Economic Times, New Delhi, 30th november 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Firms with sales below Rs.50 crore out of ambit

The tax department has reiterated that the PoEM rules, which require foreign firms to pay taxes in India if the effective control is here, will not apply to companies withaturnover of Rs.50 crore or less inafinancial year. Last month, the tax department had come out with the longawaited Place of Effective Management (PoEM) rules, which require foreign companies in India and Indian firms with overseas subsidiaries to pay local taxes if their businesses are effectively controlled by Indians. Then the rules did not setathreshold above which they were to apply. However, the accompanying press release states that the rules will not apply to companies withaturnover of up to Rs.50 crore inayear. That created confusion whether the threshold will be adhered to. Inacircular to clarify things, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) said the provision "shall not apply toacompany havingaturnover or gross receipts of ~50 crore or less inafinancial year".

PoEM rules essentially target shell …