Skip to main content

Promoters loss is PEs gain

Promoters  loss is PEs  gain
Private equity (PE) players are getting ready to bid for stressed assets, which they expect to bag at attractive valuations after an ordinance amended the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The ordinance has practically barred most promoters of the defaulting companies from bidding for their assets in the bankruptcy auction.

PE players have raised distressed assets funds totalling over Rs 4 billion in the past two years, sensing an opportunity in the increasing number of bad assets in the banking system.

These include a Rs 1.04 billion fund raised by Brook field and SBI in July 2016 anda Rs 1 billion fund raised by Piramal Group and Bain Capital in August 2016.

The change in the IBC comes at a time when 11 of the 12 cases mandated by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) for early bankruptcy proceedings are in an advanced stage of auctioning assets.

"One can expect that prices that would be realised through these auctions may be on the lower side now," said Sharad Bhatia, managing director, Multiples Alternate Asset Management,a home grown PE fund headed by Renuka Ramnath.Other PE industry executives agreed with him.

“PE players are enthused as assets would be priced more attractively now,” said the head of a foreign fund, which had raised money to bid for some of these assets.

“Promoters are in the best position to price an asset as others with limited information would have to factor in unknown risks into their bids," Bhatia said, giving the rationale for softening in asset prices.

The ordinance prohibits promoters or sister concerns of companies with non-performing assets (NPAs) of more than a year from bidding for these companies.In order to bid, promoters will have to make the NPAs standard assets by paying the principal and interest.This would bring down competition for these assets when these are auctioned.

The 12 cases currently under the process include Bhushan Steel, Lanco Infratech, Essar Steel, Alok Industries, and Amtek Auto.Bhatia said, “It would not be surprising if some of the promoters of these 12 companies move court.Also, some promoters can get hostile to the process and delay information sharing with IRPs (insolvency resolution professionals)." Distressed assets funds have almost been non starters in India.

This despite banks having Rs 10 lakh crore in stressed assets — Rs 7.8 lakh crore of bad loans and Rs 2.2 lakh crore of restructured ones.The IBC, which took effect last year, has given hope ofafair resolution in a time bound manner, as the assets go for liquidation if a resolution is not found in 270 days.

These funds held back from investing because of the lack of a regulatory framework to protect their interests and to provide them with control over the assets.They first got enthused with the RBI introducing strategic debt restructuring two and a half years ago. This allowed conversion of debt into equity, to provide lenders control over these assets.

Global funds such as Brookfield, Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB), and International Finance Corporation (IFC) tied up with domestic players State Bank of India, Piramal group, and Kotak Mahindra Bank, respectively, rolling out their distressed assets funds last year. However, they have not made any major investments yet.

Banks were unwilling to take haircuts for providing an appropriate capital structure to the new buyer.Some of these PE funds are also looking to jointly bid for these assets with a strategic player having industry experience to overcome operational challenges.
“PEs would also prefer to partner with players having a track record in running a similar business,” said India head of another foreign private equity fund.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 25th November 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …