Skip to main content

Profiteering check now picking up

Profiteering check now picking up
Kerala panel seeks action against 335 merchants
The antiprofiteering mechanism under the goods and services tax (GST) has picked up, with Kerala proposing action against 335 traders for not passing on to consumers a reduction in price under the new set of levies.The screening committee of the state has written to the standing committee at the Centre, providing a list of these merchants and evidence, demanding action.
Uttar Pradesh (UP) and Bihar, among others, say they´ve started with awareness campaigns, price information collection and investigation.“We collected information and found some were collecting GST while not being registered.Some others were additionally collecting value added tax (VAT) from consumers.
Some were charging GST above the MRP (printed Maximum Retail Price).We have demanded strict action against these entities, to discourage others from these malpractices,” said a Kerala official, on condition of anonymity.Kerala´s screening committee collected price information for a little over 600 items in the preGST and post GST periods in all districts, and suspected over charging in 430 items, according to the official.
GST law provides for an antiprofiteering mechanism to ensure the full benefits of a reduction in tax on supply of goods or services go to consumers.The full benefit of input tax credit must be passed, with commensurate reduction in prices, according to the law.UP says it is collecting information on suspected GST evasion and profiteering, including secret surveys and investigation.
“We are collecting data for businesses that are under invoicing transactions.We are also looking at entities that are doing wrong billing by charging GST over MRP. We will soon formulate a strategy against the offenders,” said an official.Most antiprofiteering cases relate to restaurants and non-brands. “Our officers are discreetly carrying out surveys and investigation.
We will take action,” he added.For local complaints, statel evel screening committee looks into it, and passes it to the central standing committee.The latter may refer cases to the Director General of Safeguards for detailed enquiry, which will in turn recommend to the National AntiProfiteering Authority, for action against offenders.
The latter body is empowered to order a reduction in prices, returning the profiteered amount with 18 per cent interest, imposition of penalty or cancellation of registration of a supplier.A Maharashtra official said awareness campaigns by the government had ensured that merchants do not profiteer.
“We have been disseminating information about how to fix prices,” he said.Adding that restaurants were initially found to be not passing on the tax benefit but doing so on being told by the authorities.“No complaint has come yet,” he said. Officials from Bihar said cases were yet to come and the state government was doing publicity campaigns to make consumers aware.
“With these being carried out, we will very shortly see cases coming in,” said the official.Officials in Assam said detailed instructions would be issued to field formations on antiprofiteering and to report on any malpractice.“We will soon start receiving complaints,” one added.The Punjab government says it will go slow on investigation for the next five or six months, till GST stabilises.
“With the antiprofiteering mechanism picking up pace, it is important for businesses to ensure compliance, to avoid trouble,” said Rajat Mohan of chartered accountants AMRG &Associates.
New facility for exporters to claim refunds
The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) on Sunday said it has introduced a utility Table 6A in Form GSTR1 for exporters to claim refunds.
An exporter can claim refund of Integrated GST tax paid at the time of export by filling the details of shipping bill and tax paid GST invoice in his Form GSTR1 in the relevant month.
The shipping bill filed by an exporter with customs authorities is considered to be an application for refund of integrated tax paid on the goods exported out of India.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 06th November 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …