Skip to main content

HC upholds ICDS validity but strikes down key provisions

HC upholds ICDS validity but strikes down key provisions
The Delhi High Court has upheld the constitutional validity of the Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS), but only to the extent that they do not go against judicial pronouncements and the provisions of the IncomeTax (IT) Act.These standards played a key role in improving India´s position in the World Bank´s ease of doing business rankings, released recently.
“The ICDS is not meant to overrule the provisions of the (Income Tax) Act, the rules thereunder, and the judicial precedents applicable thereto as they stand,” said the court on Wednesday, striking down the ICDS provisions that went against judicial pronouncements and the ITAct.Hearing the petitions filed by the Chamber of Tax Consultants and others, the court also said wherever the ICDS amends the judicial pronouncements and ITprovisions, it should be brought by the legislature and not the executive.
For instance, the court struck down ICDS I, which does away with the concept of prudence,akey accounting principle to ensure assets and income are not overstated and liabilities and expenses not understated.According to this principle,acompany might provide for bad and doubtful debts based on prudence, due to a doubt regarding non-realisation of sales booked in earlier years
This is not allowed, as deduced by the ICDS.The court said, “ICDS I, which does away with the concept of ´prudence´, is contrary to the (IT) Act and binding judicial precedents and is, therefore, unsustainable in law.” Under ICDS I, expected and mark to market losses are not allowed as a deduction, even though standard accounting principles generally allow it.The court also held ICDS II ultra vires.
This standard pertains to the valuation of inventories and eliminates the distinction between a continuing partnership business and the one after a partner quits.This is contrary to the decision of the Supreme Court in Shakti Trading Co. case, said the court.
“ICDS II is held to be ultra vires the Act and struck down as such,” it said.Ajay Singh, president of the Chamber, said the court was fair enough to restrict the powers of the Centre to notify the ICDS so far as those were contrary to judicial pronouncements and the provisions of the ITAct.
When asked whether the Chamber,a not for profit organisation with its mandate to disseminate knowledge in the field of taxation and other fields, would appeal against the court upholding the constitutional validity of the standards, he said it was still studying the finer points of the judgment.
The court also ordered against a provision in ICDS IV which requires an assessee to recognise income from export incentive in the year of making of the claim if there is “reasonable certainty” of its ultimate collection.“The ITAct provides enabling provisions to simplify computation of taxable income, thereby making the ICDS a delegated legislation.
Hence, the ICDS cannot provide for taxation which is not within the ambit of the provisions of the ITAct or accounting principles,” said Pranay Bhatia, partner, tax and regulatory services, BDO India.Amit Maheshwari of Ashok Maheswary &Associates said, “The court verdict would make the life of taxpayers simpler, and the fear that the established tax positions would be undermined is somewhat reduced.” The ICDS have 10 standards, which basically advance some income and postpone some expenses to arrive at the profitability of companies.
Earlier, tax accounting was done on a conservative basis to recognise income as and when it arose.“This is a big relief as the combination of IndAS, ICDS, and IFRS have led toalot of confusion within the industry.To my mind, ICDS should ideally be deferred till IndAS settles in,” said Girish Vanvari, partner and head –tax, KPMG India.IndAS, or Indian Accounting Standards, are adopted by Indian companies and issued by the country´s Accounting Standards Board
IFRS, or International Financial Reporting Standards, are global accounting standards issued by the IFRS Foundation and the International Accounting Standards Board.
ICDS EXPLAINE
Helped India improve on World Bank´s ease of doing business ranking
Court strikes down provisions that go against judicial pronouncements in the ITAct
Changes to judicial pronouncements and ITprovisions should come via the legislature and not the executive
ICDS comes into effect from the current assessment year –201718
ICDS advances some revenues and postpones some expenditure for taxation
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 09th November 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector Dealers with turnover of Rs 2 crore and above covered; industry says threshold too low The central government has notified the money laundering rules for the gems and jewellery sector with immediate effect. Now, any entity deals in precious metals, precious stones, or other high-value goods and has a turnover of Rs 2 crore or more in a financial year will be covered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, 2002). The limit of Rs 2 crore would be calculated on the basis of the previous year’s turnover, said the notification. The directorate general of goods and service tax intelligence has been appointed under the Act. Sources said the government’s move to apply the PMLA to the jewellery sector was a fallout of income-tax raids on jewellers soon after demonetisation last November, when it was found that they sold gold and jewellery at a huge premium and accepted old currency notes as payment. The notification, issued on Augus…

Confusion over branded food GST

Confusion over branded food GST The GST Council's statement over the weekend on applying tax on branded food items has left most of the trade confused.

Even though the Council has not changed the rates on food -0 per cent on unbranded stuff and 5 per cent on brands -many small traders who didn't levy GST earlier said they could come under the 5 per cent slab after the clarification.

While they predicted some increase in consumer prices, large players said they can absorb GST in many ways and keep prices steady.

"Trade is confused and hence on behalf of our chamber, we have asked our members to go ahead and charge 5 per cent GST," said Sushil Sureka, general secretary of the Ahilya Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Indore.

The statement clarifying the application of GST came after some businesses were found deregistering their brands and selling under corporate brand name without paying tax, after the Council exempted unbranded food from the new all-encompassing indirec…