Skip to main content

GST rules changed on refund claims

GST rules changed on refund claims
The Finance Minister has decided  thet applications/documents/forms pertaining to refund claims on account of certain Zero reated supplies shall be fileld and processed manually till further orders. Last Wednesday, notification  no 55/2017-central tax was issued, amending teh central goods and services tax (CGST)Rules and precribing new refund  application form  RFD-01A. Simultaneously, the Central Board of Excise and Customs(CBSE) presribed the procedure through Circular 17/17/17/2017-GST.
For refund of Integrated GST (IGST) paid on export of goods,the present  procedure for disbursement through custom remians unchanged.For refund of IGST paid on export of services or supplies to Special Economic Zone (SEZ) developers or units, RFD-01A must be filed by the supplier on the common portal. Then, a print out of the form should be given to the jurisdictional tax officer, with the necessary documentary evidence.
For refund of unutilised input tax credit on account of zero-rated supplies under bond or letter of undertaking without payment of IGST, RFD-01A must be filed by the supplier on the common portal. First, the amount claimed as refund will get debited from the amount in the electronic credit ledger to the extent of the claim and an acknowledgement receipt number (ARN) generated. The claimant should then incorporate the ARN in the hard copy of the RFD-01A and send the application to the jurisdictional tax officer, with all prescribed documents.
Within seven days of the receipt of a completed application, the officer must grant provisional refund of 90 per cent of the claim. The balance amount should be disbursed within 60 days of the claim, after due processing. All the communications in regard to the claims, such as acknowledgement, deficiency memo, provisional refund order, payment advice, refund sanction or rejection order, order for complete adjustment or with holding of sanctioned refund, notice of rejection of claim, reply to show cause notice, etc, should be done manually. Within the timelines as specified in the relevant Rules, till the refund module is operational on the common portal. If any claim is rejected fully or partially, the amount debited, to the extent of rejection, should be re-credited to the electronic credit ledger of the claimant.
Where a tax payer has not been assigned to any tax authority, the refund application may be filed either before the central or state tax authority, till the administrative mechanism for assigning of taxpayers to the respective authority is implemented. In which case, an undertaking is to be given that the claim for sanction of refund has been made to only one of these.
Any central or state authority may process the application and sanction the refund but the payment is to be made only by the respective one. That is, CGST can be disbursed only by a central tax authority and State GST only by a state one. The refund order issued by either is to be communicated to the counterpart concerned within three days for the purpose of payment of the relevant sanctioned refund amount, says CBEC. This means the exporter must wait longer and follow up with central and state authorities. We now have to wait and see how this new system works.
The Business Standard,New Delhi, 20th November 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …