Skip to main content

GST advisory panel receives 700 representations on industry woes

GST advisory panel receives 700 representations on industry woes
The six member advisory panel formed by the government for simplifying and rationalising the goods and services tax (GST) has received more than 700 representations on problems faced by industry over return filing, the eway bill, input tax credit, and exports.The committee will now meet for the first time on Wednesday to take up these issues, ahead of the crucial GST Council meeting on Thursday in Guwahati.
Some of its recommendations may be taken up by the Council.The panel includes representations from trade and industry.“The government is open to taking feedback from industry and rectifying the anomalies in the law. We are putting in efforts to make the GST industry friendly and will be open to incorporating suggestions by the advisory panel,” said a government official.
The final report of the group will be submitted on November 30 and discussed in the subsequent meeting of the Council.“If the panel comes toaconclusion on certain issues, we may like to meet the finance minister and give interim suggestions that may be taken up in the Council meeting on Friday,” said Praveen Khandelwal, secretary general of the Confederation of All India Traders and a member of the advisory committee
Prime Minister Narendera modi had said on Saturday that for the GST, the government was accepting issues raised by traders and  businesses and the council would make the neccessary changes in the next  council meeting,including a broader and simplified composition scheme and easier compliance for tax assessees.
The advisory panel will discusss the electronic way bill and may take a view that it should  only apply to inter-state supplies and not movements of goods within the state. The Panel will also adddress an irriant arising out norms on e-way bill is vaild for 100 km in 24 hours."Giving a specified time to cover a particular distance is a bit absurd.
We will discuss that as well said another members of the  panel on condition of anonymity.Ajay sahai , director general of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations and a member of the advisory panel, said that the integrated GST (IGST)should be extended to exports under export promotion schemes on a post export basis
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 08th November 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit