Skip to main content

Govt owned enterprises may soon face the IBC heat

Govt owned enterprises may soon face the IBC heat
For first time, 9 PSBs have taken a state owned enterprise to task
Till now, private corporate debtors have been at the receiving end of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.That may soon change with the first state owned enterprise going through the insolvency process.This may set the ball rolling for similar instances of defaulting government owned enterprises being taken to task by financial and operational creditors, said experts.
In a case testing the statutory powers vested with creditors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), insolvency resolution proceedings were initiated against West Bengal Essential Commodities Supply Corporation (WBECSC),a state government undertaking that is in the business of procuring and distributing food grains and essential commodities, in May this year.This case is close to getting resolved, with the state enterprise settling its dues with the consortium of creditors (nine public sector banks).
The court appointed insolvency resolution professional (IRP) is now in the process of filing a closing report with the Kolkata bench of the National Company Law Board that had initiated the insolvency proceedings.The creditors had put forward claims to the tune of ~359 crore before the IRP during the resolution process.Following negotiations, the WBECSC and the creditors agreed to a one time settlement of Rs 185 crore.
The public sector banks took a haircut, forgoing the interest accruing to them.The state enterprise had taken a loan from a consortium of banks in 200405, but only made part payment of the dues.A questionnaire sent to the managing director of the WBECSC in this regard remained unanswered.“The case would be seen as an opening of a remedy with various operational creditors as well as financial creditor who are dealing with any state owned companies,” said Anil Goel, the court appointed IRP and chairman, AAA Insolvency Professionals.
Suppliers to government owned discoms in the wind and hydro power sectors, who have notched up huge dues, are said to be keenly following this case, say experts.There were several peculiar challenges in dealing with a state owned enterprise while arriving at a resolution between the corporate debtor and the consortium of creditors.The IRP found it difficult to arrive at a liquidation value of the corporate debtor as the financial accounts were not audited for last four years.
“The value of current assets, including stock and receivable, was not available.There was no other option of resolution other than onetime settlement with the banks,” says Goel.When the IRP, under IBC, decided to freeze and take control of the bank accounts of the enterprise, this lead to a payment crisis, affecting paddy procurement from farmers.
As a way out, the IRP had to delegate his power to operate the bank accounts to the officers of the WBECSC as its authorised signatories.“We took this decision because this was a state government owned company and the system of monitoring of funds was in existence,” said Goel.A key take away, say insolvency professionals, while dealing with government owned enterprises is to work as per the procedures followed by these companies.
“In practice it is going to be challenging to complete resolution process within the time frame provided as government companies would require approvals at multiple levels,” says Sumant Batra, managing partner and head, insolvency and corporate law practice, Kesar DassB &Associates. As per the Code, any insolvency resolution proceedings have to be completed within 180 days that is extendable to 270 days.
Further, there is lack of clarity on how the Code would operate in case a company has been identified for disinvestment.“The central government can exclude such companies from the preview of IBC,” suggests Batra.Some experts feel as debt laden state owned companies start facing the heat of the new insolvency resolution proceedings, governments would have to support these businesses and arrange for funds to avoid liquidation.
IBC does not make distinction between public and private sector enterprises. As long as PSUs are limited liability or limitedl iability partnership, it would be eligible for IBC
Why is itdifficult to execute the Code in case of govt owned enterprises?
Challenging to complete resolution process within the time frame as government companies require approval sat multiple levels Lack of clarity on how the Code would operate in case a company has been identified ford is investment Departments of government that under take economica ctivities are excluded from the IBC

The Business Standard, New Delhi, 2nd November 2017


Popular posts from this blog

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector Dealers with turnover of Rs 2 crore and above covered; industry says threshold too low The central government has notified the money laundering rules for the gems and jewellery sector with immediate effect. Now, any entity deals in precious metals, precious stones, or other high-value goods and has a turnover of Rs 2 crore or more in a financial year will be covered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, 2002). The limit of Rs 2 crore would be calculated on the basis of the previous year’s turnover, said the notification. The directorate general of goods and service tax intelligence has been appointed under the Act. Sources said the government’s move to apply the PMLA to the jewellery sector was a fallout of income-tax raids on jewellers soon after demonetisation last November, when it was found that they sold gold and jewellery at a huge premium and accepted old currency notes as payment. The notification, issued on Augus…

Confusion over branded food GST

Confusion over branded food GST The GST Council's statement over the weekend on applying tax on branded food items has left most of the trade confused.

Even though the Council has not changed the rates on food -0 per cent on unbranded stuff and 5 per cent on brands -many small traders who didn't levy GST earlier said they could come under the 5 per cent slab after the clarification.

While they predicted some increase in consumer prices, large players said they can absorb GST in many ways and keep prices steady.

"Trade is confused and hence on behalf of our chamber, we have asked our members to go ahead and charge 5 per cent GST," said Sushil Sureka, general secretary of the Ahilya Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Indore.

The statement clarifying the application of GST came after some businesses were found deregistering their brands and selling under corporate brand name without paying tax, after the Council exempted unbranded food from the new all-encompassing indirec…