Skip to main content

Govt owned enterprises may soon face the IBC heat

Govt owned enterprises may soon face the IBC heat
For first time, 9 PSBs have taken a state owned enterprise to task
Till now, private corporate debtors have been at the receiving end of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.That may soon change with the first state owned enterprise going through the insolvency process.This may set the ball rolling for similar instances of defaulting government owned enterprises being taken to task by financial and operational creditors, said experts.
In a case testing the statutory powers vested with creditors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), insolvency resolution proceedings were initiated against West Bengal Essential Commodities Supply Corporation (WBECSC),a state government undertaking that is in the business of procuring and distributing food grains and essential commodities, in May this year.This case is close to getting resolved, with the state enterprise settling its dues with the consortium of creditors (nine public sector banks).
The court appointed insolvency resolution professional (IRP) is now in the process of filing a closing report with the Kolkata bench of the National Company Law Board that had initiated the insolvency proceedings.The creditors had put forward claims to the tune of ~359 crore before the IRP during the resolution process.Following negotiations, the WBECSC and the creditors agreed to a one time settlement of Rs 185 crore.
The public sector banks took a haircut, forgoing the interest accruing to them.The state enterprise had taken a loan from a consortium of banks in 200405, but only made part payment of the dues.A questionnaire sent to the managing director of the WBECSC in this regard remained unanswered.“The case would be seen as an opening of a remedy with various operational creditors as well as financial creditor who are dealing with any state owned companies,” said Anil Goel, the court appointed IRP and chairman, AAA Insolvency Professionals.
Suppliers to government owned discoms in the wind and hydro power sectors, who have notched up huge dues, are said to be keenly following this case, say experts.There were several peculiar challenges in dealing with a state owned enterprise while arriving at a resolution between the corporate debtor and the consortium of creditors.The IRP found it difficult to arrive at a liquidation value of the corporate debtor as the financial accounts were not audited for last four years.
“The value of current assets, including stock and receivable, was not available.There was no other option of resolution other than onetime settlement with the banks,” says Goel.When the IRP, under IBC, decided to freeze and take control of the bank accounts of the enterprise, this lead to a payment crisis, affecting paddy procurement from farmers.
As a way out, the IRP had to delegate his power to operate the bank accounts to the officers of the WBECSC as its authorised signatories.“We took this decision because this was a state government owned company and the system of monitoring of funds was in existence,” said Goel.A key take away, say insolvency professionals, while dealing with government owned enterprises is to work as per the procedures followed by these companies.
“In practice it is going to be challenging to complete resolution process within the time frame provided as government companies would require approvals at multiple levels,” says Sumant Batra, managing partner and head, insolvency and corporate law practice, Kesar DassB &Associates. As per the Code, any insolvency resolution proceedings have to be completed within 180 days that is extendable to 270 days.
Further, there is lack of clarity on how the Code would operate in case a company has been identified for disinvestment.“The central government can exclude such companies from the preview of IBC,” suggests Batra.Some experts feel as debt laden state owned companies start facing the heat of the new insolvency resolution proceedings, governments would have to support these businesses and arrange for funds to avoid liquidation.
IBC does not make distinction between public and private sector enterprises. As long as PSUs are limited liability or limitedl iability partnership, it would be eligible for IBC
Why is itdifficult to execute the Code in case of govt owned enterprises?
Challenging to complete resolution process within the time frame as government companies require approval sat multiple levels Lack of clarity on how the Code would operate in case a company has been identified ford is investment Departments of government that under take economica ctivities are excluded from the IBC

The Business Standard, New Delhi, 2nd November 2017


Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Firms with sales below Rs.50 crore out of ambit

The tax department has reiterated that the PoEM rules, which require foreign firms to pay taxes in India if the effective control is here, will not apply to companies withaturnover of Rs.50 crore or less inafinancial year. Last month, the tax department had come out with the longawaited Place of Effective Management (PoEM) rules, which require foreign companies in India and Indian firms with overseas subsidiaries to pay local taxes if their businesses are effectively controlled by Indians. Then the rules did not setathreshold above which they were to apply. However, the accompanying press release states that the rules will not apply to companies withaturnover of up to Rs.50 crore inayear. That created confusion whether the threshold will be adhered to. Inacircular to clarify things, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) said the provision "shall not apply toacompany havingaturnover or gross receipts of ~50 crore or less inafinancial year".

PoEM rules essentially target shell …