Skip to main content

Defaulting promoters set to lose their companies

Defaulting promoters set to lose their companies
Wilful defaulters and borrowers with NPAs for a year or more cannot bid NOT ELIGIBLE FOR BIDDING
An ordinance amending the and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) barred promoters of undergoing the resolution process for their own companies when auctioned as part of bankruptcy proceedings.Besides, sister concerns and corporate will also not be eligible to these companies.
The ordinance, promulgated Thursday, added Section 29A to “Aperson shall not be eligible to resolution plan if such person, or person acting jointly with such any person who isapromoter or control of such person, insolvent.” This prohibits promoters or sister of companies with non performing more than a year from bidding for these companies
In order to bid, promoters will have to make the NPAs standard assets by paying the principal and interest.However, even this is not allowed once the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has accepted an insolvency petition.
None of the promoters or their associates can buy the stressed assets of the 12 large debt accounts suggested for insolvency proceedings by the Reserve Bank of India. Wilful defaulters also have been banned from buying stressed assets.
Officials said wilful defaulters were fly by night operators and were anyway unlikely to bid for companies.They added promoters were not debarred from bidding unless a case was admitted in the NCLT, but merely discouraged If a company paid, say, Rs 10,000 crore out of its total NPAs of Rs 50,000crore to convert the loan into a standard asset, the insolvency process would benefit, they said.
Insolvency professionals were divided on the Ordinance.Nilesh Sharma, senior partner at Dhir and Dhir Associates, said the government should remove the clause that prohibits any account with NPAs of over one year from bidding.The big concern among resolution professionals is the amendments will disrupt nearly all pending insolvency proceedings.
Besides, the eligibility of all bidders will have to be ascertained before examining their bids. “Earlier, the resolution plan had to qualify for consideration, now the bidder must also qualify.In cases where only the promoter has submitted a plan, and such promoter is found to be in eligible, fresh bids will need to be invited," said Sumant Batra, managing partner of Kesar DassB &Associates.
Companies are allowed180 days to find a resolution plan after a case is admitted by theNCLT.This period can be extended by 90 days. If 270 days elapse or no bidder comes forward, the debtor will be pushed into liquidation.Identification of wilful defaulters has been left to banks, which experts said might lend arbitrariness to the exercise even though it followed RBI guidelines.
"A provision that is punitive or takes away a right must been shrinedin the statute as a substantive provision and not left to be determined by an interested party (lender)," an expert said.The risk is thatapromoter can challenge such determination byalender in court and seekastay on insolvency proceedings till the challenge is decided.
A court might not stay the insolvency process and the promoter could lose his company, but later if the bank´s decision were found to be illegal by court, the promoter would become entitled to claim damages, expertsadded.The amendments also place foreign bidders in an advantageous position as the concept of wilful defaulter may not exist in other countries and the disqualification criteria in corresponding situations may be different.
There are others who support these amendments.“This will reassure new investors about the credibility of the process.Steps taken to provide clarity and reduction of transaction costs associated with resolution would be welcome and will provide for greater participation by investors and more innovative resolution processes,” said Manish Aggarwal of KPMG in India.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 24th November 2017


Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …