Skip to main content

Cabinet clears setting up of GST anti profiteering body

Cabinet clears setting up of GST anti profiteering body
The Cabinet on Thursday set the ball rolling for establishment ofanational antiprofiteering authority amid reports that restaurants were not passing on the benefits of reduced goods and services tax (GST) rates to consumers.
The Cabinet cleared the creation of the posts of chairman and members of the authority, which will ensure consumers receive the benefits of reduced prices in the new indirect tax regime.
“This paves the way for immediate establishment of this apex body,” said Union law minister Ravi Shankar Prasad.
“The National AntiProfiteering Authority is an assurance to consumers.
If any consumer feels the benefit of tax rate cuts is not being passed on, he can complain to the authority,” the minister added.
The GST Council had last week decided to lower rates on about 200 items.
It had also reduced the rate on restaurants to five per cent.
There have been complaints that some restaurants are not passing on the benefits because input tax credit is not available to them now.
The Council had earlier approved the setting up ofafivemember authority for consumers to file complaints if price reductions were not passed on.Afivemember panel headed by Cabinet SecretaryPKSinha and comprising Revenue Secretary Hasmukh Adhia, CBEC Chairman Vanaja Sarna and chief secretaries from two states has been entrusted with the task of selecting the chairman and members of the authority.
“It is now expected that the government will soon notify the methodology to be used to determine whether profiteering has occurred,” said MS Mani, senior director -indirect tax, Deloitte.
“We are hopeful the body will take constructive measures, so that there is no return of the dreaded ´inspector raj´,”said Archit Gupta, chief executive officer, ClearTax.
The authority will haveasunset date of two years from the date the chairman assumes charge.
Complaints of a local nature will be sent to a state level screening committee.
Those at the national level will be marked toastanding committee.
These committees will refer cases for investigation to the Directorate General of Safeguards, which will send its report to the authority.
If the authority finds a company has not passed on GST benefits, it will either direct the company to refund consumers or transfer the amount toaconsumer welfare fund.
The authority can ask for returning undue profits to consumers along with 18 per cent interest.
It can also impose a penalty.
The authority will have the power to cancel GST registration of any business, but that will be the final step against any violator.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 17th November 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …