Skip to main content

Cabinet clears setting up of GST anti profiteering body

Cabinet clears setting up of GST anti profiteering body
The Cabinet on Thursday set the ball rolling for establishment ofanational antiprofiteering authority amid reports that restaurants were not passing on the benefits of reduced goods and services tax (GST) rates to consumers.
The Cabinet cleared the creation of the posts of chairman and members of the authority, which will ensure consumers receive the benefits of reduced prices in the new indirect tax regime.
“This paves the way for immediate establishment of this apex body,” said Union law minister Ravi Shankar Prasad.
“The National AntiProfiteering Authority is an assurance to consumers.
If any consumer feels the benefit of tax rate cuts is not being passed on, he can complain to the authority,” the minister added.
The GST Council had last week decided to lower rates on about 200 items.
It had also reduced the rate on restaurants to five per cent.
There have been complaints that some restaurants are not passing on the benefits because input tax credit is not available to them now.
The Council had earlier approved the setting up ofafivemember authority for consumers to file complaints if price reductions were not passed on.Afivemember panel headed by Cabinet SecretaryPKSinha and comprising Revenue Secretary Hasmukh Adhia, CBEC Chairman Vanaja Sarna and chief secretaries from two states has been entrusted with the task of selecting the chairman and members of the authority.
“It is now expected that the government will soon notify the methodology to be used to determine whether profiteering has occurred,” said MS Mani, senior director -indirect tax, Deloitte.
“We are hopeful the body will take constructive measures, so that there is no return of the dreaded ´inspector raj´,”said Archit Gupta, chief executive officer, ClearTax.
The authority will haveasunset date of two years from the date the chairman assumes charge.
Complaints of a local nature will be sent to a state level screening committee.
Those at the national level will be marked toastanding committee.
These committees will refer cases for investigation to the Directorate General of Safeguards, which will send its report to the authority.
If the authority finds a company has not passed on GST benefits, it will either direct the company to refund consumers or transfer the amount toaconsumer welfare fund.
The authority can ask for returning undue profits to consumers along with 18 per cent interest.
It can also impose a penalty.
The authority will have the power to cancel GST registration of any business, but that will be the final step against any violator.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 17th November 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit