Skip to main content

Cabinet clears changes to plug loopholes in insolvency code

Cabinet clears changes to plug loopholes in insolvency code
Govt to amend insolvency and bankruptcy rules via ordinance, will block promoters deemed wilful defaulters from regaining control of firmsThe Union cabinet on Wednesday approved amendments to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to plug potential loopholes in the new corporate turn around regime and to ensure rescued companies remain in reliable hands.
Finance minister Arun Jaitley said changes to the IBC have been proposed through an ordinance that’s awaiting presidential assent.One of the changes proposed is to ensure that promoters deemed wilful defaulters do not eventually end up taking control of the company again. The exact nature of the amendment and its scope will be known only after the text of the ordinance is available after the president gives his assent, a person familiar with the development said on condition of anonymity.
“Some changes have been proposed in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Since this is being done by way of an ordinance, till it is approved, as a matter of propriety, we shall not give details,” Jaitley told reporters.
The government put in place a new bankruptcy resolution regime and empowered the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to nudge banks to take defaulting firms to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in a decisive attempt to deal with the Rs10 trillion of toxic assets (bad loans and restructured loans) choking the banking system. The bad loans have also impaired lenders’ ability to finance new projects to boost economic growth, which slumped to 5.7% in the quarter to June, the slowest pace in three years.
The administration has been quick in responding to implementation challenges of the new bankruptcy code, one of which is the possibility of wilful defaulters subverting the legal process to remain in control of the company by proposing revival schemes. The code, as it stood prior to the amendments approved on Wednesday, does not prevent promoters of a failed company from proposing a turnaround plan. There have been concerns that promoters could reacquire their companies at a discount once the creditors decide to sacrifice a part of the money they are owed as part of a debt resolution plan.
In recent weeks, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India made it compulsory for the revival plans to take recognizance of the credentials of those who propose revival schemes, including original promoters, and to specify how the interests of employees, vendors and customers of the failed entity will be taken care of. The regulator also clarified that if the NCLT approves a turnaround scheme, the promoter will be deemed to have consented to it.
In June, RBI referred 12 large defaulters to creditors for the start of bankruptcy proceedings at the NCLT. The 12 entities made up a quarter of gross bad loans, which reached Rs7.79 trillion at the end of June.
The proposed amendments are expected to make the insolvency resolution process more robust, said Kalpesh Mehta, a partner at Deloitte India. “The implementation of this amendment would block failed promoters from regaining control of the companies facing insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,” he said.
One banker red-flagged a potential challenge.
“There is a risk that a few bidders may collude with banks to declare some of the competing bidders as wilful defaulters in order to eliminate competition. In such a scenario, the amendment could lead to a fall in realization of value for the creditors,” said the banker, a deputy general manager at a public sector bank who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Sumant Batra, managing partner at law firm Kesar Dass B and Associates, said that if the bankruptcy code does not define who a wilful defaulter is, a bank’s decision to declare a promoter as a wilful defaulter may be subject to a challenge in court and will complicate the resolution process.
The Economic Times, New Delhi, 23th November 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …