Skip to main content

Anti-Profiteering Guidelines Under GST Likely by Next Mth

Anti-Profiteering Guidelines Under GST Likely by Next Mth
Methodology to ascertain if rate cut benefits are passed on to consumers
Days after tax rates of about 178 products under goods & services Tax (GST) were changed, the government could be looking to come out with detailed anti-profiteering guidelines, according to three people close to the development.The broad idea is to prescribe a methodology to ascertain whether companies are passing on the tax reduction under GST and benefits derived from input tax credits to consumers. The guidelines could come by December first week, according to the people in the know.
Several experts — in the government and tax advisors — have been raising several hypothetical questions around the anti-profiteering clause of the GST. Can a company pass benefits of the recent GST rate reduction on one brand of bodywash to another brand of bodywash? Can the company cross subsidise reduction in GST rates in bodywash to something else it sells, say hair oil?
The government’s reference point for arriving at the anti-profiteering rules is two countries, Australia and Malaysia. The anti-profiteering methodology prescribed by Malaysia focused on product-wise pre- and post-GST net profits of companies. The Australian method focussed on pre-GST and post-GST price changes among other things.
“There are several learnings from the manner in which other countries have dealt with the issue of profiteering. The key being that it is difficult to monitor all sectors and businesses. There is an urgent need for the government to notify the methodology, which would be used to determine cases of profiteering, as businesses will need clarity and certainty in order to plan compliance with the antiprofiteering rules,” said MS Mani, partner, Deloitte India.
In the last few days, most companies have also rushed to tax experts to know how they can pass on the benefits to consumers. Some of the doubts are around whether cross subsidising one product with another will be permitted and the duration in which the benefits have to be passed on to the consumers.
“While the guidelines are not yet out, cross subsidy across product categories may not be permitted. However, companies can possibly pass on the benefits within the product mix, like passing on benefits of one soap brand to another,” said Pratik Jain, national leader, indirect tax, PwC India.
Tax experts say in its current form antiprofiteering norms could be challenged in court if any demand is made. They add that compliance cost of companies should be taken into account while determining anti-profiteering. In Australia and Malaysia, compliance cost is deducted from total benefits to be passed on to customers. “Complying with regulations would also entail significant activities in the context of the product cost records maintained by businesses as the compliance could be required at product level and not only at entity level,” said Mani.
Legal experts say a company’s net profits have to also be taken into account while calculating anti-profiteering. “Businesses should have their own set of guidelines and workings to show they have made efforts to reduce prices after factoring their costs and regular profit margins. These workings should be based on scientific assumptions,” said Abhishek A Rastogi, partner at Khaitan & Co.
People in the know said the government has formed a five-member National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAPA) which is required to scrutinise businesses and determine where companies are not passing on benefits to customers. The government is also seeking NAPA officials’ inputs to arrive at a methodology for anti-profiteering.
Widen Tax Base
The government must allow the competition of india to probe case where manufactures and service providers fail pass on the benefit  of a lower tax burden on their suppliers to consumer.Malaysia's experience was not a happy one. The ant-profiteering rule led to ligitation and administration challenges and indai should not borrow from this practice.Widening the tax base will check undue profiteering and competition.
Nation Can Ask FM to Resign: Sinha
Former finance minister yashwnt sinha has termed demonetisation and GSt as "failures"for which the country could demand resignation of FM arun jaitely as the two measures had led to "slowdown of the economy".On a 3 day visit to poll-bound Gujarat, Sinha said he was not part of BJP's Margdarshak Mandal.He claimed that one of the biggest flaws in GST was that 40% of revenue stream comprising alcohol, petro products and some aspects related to constuction sector have been kept out of GSt.Sinha said if these are brought under the GST, people of the country willm get relief.
The Economic Times, New Delhi, 15th November 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Firms with sales below Rs.50 crore out of ambit

The tax department has reiterated that the PoEM rules, which require foreign firms to pay taxes in India if the effective control is here, will not apply to companies withaturnover of Rs.50 crore or less inafinancial year. Last month, the tax department had come out with the longawaited Place of Effective Management (PoEM) rules, which require foreign companies in India and Indian firms with overseas subsidiaries to pay local taxes if their businesses are effectively controlled by Indians. Then the rules did not setathreshold above which they were to apply. However, the accompanying press release states that the rules will not apply to companies withaturnover of up to Rs.50 crore inayear. That created confusion whether the threshold will be adhered to. Inacircular to clarify things, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) said the provision "shall not apply toacompany havingaturnover or gross receipts of ~50 crore or less inafinancial year".

PoEM rules essentially target shell …