Skip to main content

Anti-Profiteering Guidelines Under GST Likely by Next Mth

Anti-Profiteering Guidelines Under GST Likely by Next Mth
Methodology to ascertain if rate cut benefits are passed on to consumers
Days after tax rates of about 178 products under goods & services Tax (GST) were changed, the government could be looking to come out with detailed anti-profiteering guidelines, according to three people close to the development.The broad idea is to prescribe a methodology to ascertain whether companies are passing on the tax reduction under GST and benefits derived from input tax credits to consumers. The guidelines could come by December first week, according to the people in the know.
Several experts — in the government and tax advisors — have been raising several hypothetical questions around the anti-profiteering clause of the GST. Can a company pass benefits of the recent GST rate reduction on one brand of bodywash to another brand of bodywash? Can the company cross subsidise reduction in GST rates in bodywash to something else it sells, say hair oil?
The government’s reference point for arriving at the anti-profiteering rules is two countries, Australia and Malaysia. The anti-profiteering methodology prescribed by Malaysia focused on product-wise pre- and post-GST net profits of companies. The Australian method focussed on pre-GST and post-GST price changes among other things.
“There are several learnings from the manner in which other countries have dealt with the issue of profiteering. The key being that it is difficult to monitor all sectors and businesses. There is an urgent need for the government to notify the methodology, which would be used to determine cases of profiteering, as businesses will need clarity and certainty in order to plan compliance with the antiprofiteering rules,” said MS Mani, partner, Deloitte India.
In the last few days, most companies have also rushed to tax experts to know how they can pass on the benefits to consumers. Some of the doubts are around whether cross subsidising one product with another will be permitted and the duration in which the benefits have to be passed on to the consumers.
“While the guidelines are not yet out, cross subsidy across product categories may not be permitted. However, companies can possibly pass on the benefits within the product mix, like passing on benefits of one soap brand to another,” said Pratik Jain, national leader, indirect tax, PwC India.
Tax experts say in its current form antiprofiteering norms could be challenged in court if any demand is made. They add that compliance cost of companies should be taken into account while determining anti-profiteering. In Australia and Malaysia, compliance cost is deducted from total benefits to be passed on to customers. “Complying with regulations would also entail significant activities in the context of the product cost records maintained by businesses as the compliance could be required at product level and not only at entity level,” said Mani.
Legal experts say a company’s net profits have to also be taken into account while calculating anti-profiteering. “Businesses should have their own set of guidelines and workings to show they have made efforts to reduce prices after factoring their costs and regular profit margins. These workings should be based on scientific assumptions,” said Abhishek A Rastogi, partner at Khaitan & Co.
People in the know said the government has formed a five-member National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAPA) which is required to scrutinise businesses and determine where companies are not passing on benefits to customers. The government is also seeking NAPA officials’ inputs to arrive at a methodology for anti-profiteering.
Widen Tax Base
The government must allow the competition of india to probe case where manufactures and service providers fail pass on the benefit  of a lower tax burden on their suppliers to consumer.Malaysia's experience was not a happy one. The ant-profiteering rule led to ligitation and administration challenges and indai should not borrow from this practice.Widening the tax base will check undue profiteering and competition.
Nation Can Ask FM to Resign: Sinha
Former finance minister yashwnt sinha has termed demonetisation and GSt as "failures"for which the country could demand resignation of FM arun jaitely as the two measures had led to "slowdown of the economy".On a 3 day visit to poll-bound Gujarat, Sinha said he was not part of BJP's Margdarshak Mandal.He claimed that one of the biggest flaws in GST was that 40% of revenue stream comprising alcohol, petro products and some aspects related to constuction sector have been kept out of GSt.Sinha said if these are brought under the GST, people of the country willm get relief.
The Economic Times, New Delhi, 15th November 2017


Popular posts from this blog

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector Dealers with turnover of Rs 2 crore and above covered; industry says threshold too low The central government has notified the money laundering rules for the gems and jewellery sector with immediate effect. Now, any entity deals in precious metals, precious stones, or other high-value goods and has a turnover of Rs 2 crore or more in a financial year will be covered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, 2002). The limit of Rs 2 crore would be calculated on the basis of the previous year’s turnover, said the notification. The directorate general of goods and service tax intelligence has been appointed under the Act. Sources said the government’s move to apply the PMLA to the jewellery sector was a fallout of income-tax raids on jewellers soon after demonetisation last November, when it was found that they sold gold and jewellery at a huge premium and accepted old currency notes as payment. The notification, issued on Augus…

Confusion over branded food GST

Confusion over branded food GST The GST Council's statement over the weekend on applying tax on branded food items has left most of the trade confused.

Even though the Council has not changed the rates on food -0 per cent on unbranded stuff and 5 per cent on brands -many small traders who didn't levy GST earlier said they could come under the 5 per cent slab after the clarification.

While they predicted some increase in consumer prices, large players said they can absorb GST in many ways and keep prices steady.

"Trade is confused and hence on behalf of our chamber, we have asked our members to go ahead and charge 5 per cent GST," said Sushil Sureka, general secretary of the Ahilya Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Indore.

The statement clarifying the application of GST came after some businesses were found deregistering their brands and selling under corporate brand name without paying tax, after the Council exempted unbranded food from the new all-encompassing indirec…